Abstract
In the current climate of setting professional standards for the teaching profession, the question arises as to whether schools have a duty of care to students with regard to educational outcomes. Thus, an issue of growing concern for lawyers, judges, and educators in the US, England and Australia is educational malpractice or negligence. But courts have been largely unresponsive when plaintiffs raise claims of this nature. As one American judge pithily noted, educational malpractice “is a tort beloved of commentators but not of courts.” Against this background, this chapter examines legal developments on educational malpractice in the US, England and Australia, and then discusses the impact of setting professional standards for teaching. It concludes with reflections on the future, if any, for claims of educational malpractice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abela v State of Victoria [2013] FCA 832.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). 1220.0 – ANZSCO – Australian and New Zealand standard classification of occupations, version 1.2. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/1220.0Chapter612013%20Version%201.2
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (AITSL). (2011). National professional standards for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/verve/_resources/AITSL_National_Professional_Standards_for_Teachers.pdf
B.M. v State, 649 P.2d 425 (Mont. 1982).
Babie, P., Russo, C. J., & Dickinson, G. M. (2004). Supervision of students: An exploratory comparative analysis. Australia & New Zealand Journal of Law and Education, 9(1), 41–70.
BBC. (2001, October 1). School sued over poor results. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/1573033.stm
Bell v Board of Educ. of the City of W.Haven, 739 A.2d 321(Conn. Ct. App. 1999).
Civil Liability Act 1936 (SA).
Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW).
Civil Liability Act 2002 (Tas).
Civil Liability Act 2002 (WA).
Civil Liability Act 2003 (Qld).
Commonwealth v Introvigne. (1982). 150 CLR 258.
Cox v. State of New South Wales (2007) NSWSC 471.
Cumming, J. J. (2009). Assessment challenges, the law and the future. In C. Wyatt-Smith & J. J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational assessment in the 21st century – Connecting theory and practice (pp. 157–179). London: Springer.
D.S.W. v Fairbanks North Star Borough Sch. Dist., 628 P.2d 554 (Alaska 1981).
Dale, A. (2011, June 1). Parents must pay up – Court rules Roseville college did enough to help daughters. The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.news.com.au/top-stories/parents-must-pay-up-court-rules-private-school-did-enough-to-help-daughters/story-e6frfkp9-1226066808945
DeMitchell, T. A., DeMitchell, T. A., & Gagnon, D. (2012). Teacher effectiveness and value-added modelling: Building a pathway to educational malpractice? Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal, 2, 257–301.
Department of Education. (2011). Teachers’ standards: Guidance for school leaders, school staff and governing bodies. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/301107/Teachers__Standards.pdf
Disability Discrimination Act. (1992). Retrieved from http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/dda1992264/
Donohue v. Copiague Union Free Sch. Dist., 418 N.Y.S.2d 375 (N.Y. 1979).
Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562.
Eckes, S. E., Decker, J. R., & Richardson, E. N. (2012). Trends in court opinions involving negligence in K-12 schools: Considerations for teachers and administrators. West’s Education Law Reporter, 275, 505.
Elson, J. (1978). A common law remedy for the educational harms caused by incompetent or careless teaching. Northwestern University Law Review, 73, 641–771.
Foster, W. F. (1985). Educational malpractice: A Tort for the untaught? University of British Columbia Law Review, 19, 161–244.
Funston, R. (1980–1981). Educational malpractice: A cause of action in search of a theory. San Diego Law Review, 18, 743–812.
Geyer v Downs. (1977). 138 CLR 90.
Grant Mears v Sydney Anglican Schools Corporation [2016] NSWCA 39.
Hannan, E. (2006, August 15). School payout for boy’s reading failure. The Australian, p. 1.
Hoffman v. Board of Educ., 424 N.Y.S.2d 376 (N.Y. 1979).
Hudson, F. (2008, March 16). Father wants refund on Brighton Grammar school fees. Sunday Herald Sun. Retrieved from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/sons-flunk-school-dad-demands-a-refund/storye6frg6n6-1111115809105
Hunter v. Board of Educ. of Montgomery Cnty., 439 A.2d 582 (Md.1982).
Hutt, E., & Tang, A. (2013). The new education malpractice litigation. Virginia Law Review, 99(3), 419–492.
Jamieson, L. S. (1991). Educational malpractice: A lesson in professional accountability. Boston College Law Review, 32(4), 899–965.
Keeton, W. P., Dobbs, D. B., Keeton, R. E., & Owen, D. G. (1984). Prosser and Keeton on the law of Torts (5th ed.). St Paul: West Publishing Co.
Maglan, C. (2016, October 27). Judge dismisses lawsuit challenging Minnesota teachers union protections. Duluth News Tribune (MN) at A 9, 2016 WLNR 32881528.
March v E & M H Stramare Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506.
Matos, A. (2016, April 14). Lawsuit accuses Minnesota of protecting bad teachers at expense of students. Minneapolis-St. Paul, Star Tribune. Retrieved from http://www.startribune.com/suit-says-minnesota-protects-bad-teachers-at-expense-of-students/375609941
Mawdsley, R. D., & Cumming, J. J. (2008a). Educational malpractice and setting damages for ineffective teaching: A comparison of legal principles in the USA, England and Australia. Education and the Law, 20(1), 25–46.
Mawdsley, R. D., & Cumming, J. J. (2008b). The origins and development of education law as a separate field of law in the United States and Australia. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Law & Education, 13(2), 7–20.
Mawdsley, R. D., & Mawdsley, J. L. (2012). Should educational malpractice be actionable? In C. J. Russo (Ed.), School law (pp. 213–227). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Mears v Sydney Anglican Schools Corporation [2013] NSWSC 535; Mears v Sydney Anglican schools corporation (No. 2)[2013] NSWSC 876.
Moore v Vanderloo, 386 N.W.2d 108 (Iowa 1986).
Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Miller Steamship Co Pty Ltd (Wagon Mound (No 2))[1967] AC 617.
Oyston v St Patrick’s College [2013] NSWCA 135.
Peter W v. San Francisco Unified Sch. Dist., 131 Cal. Rptr. 854 (Cal. Ct. App. 1976).
Phelps v Hillingdon London Borough Council [1999] 1 W.L.R. 500.
Phelps v London Borough of Hillingdon [2001] 2 AC 619.
Raethel, S. (1996, April 11). Pupils sue over missing lessons. Sydney Morning Herald, p. 3.
Ramsay, I. (1988). Educational negligence and the legalisation of education. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 11, 184–218.
Ramsay v Larsen. (1964). 111 CLR 16.
Roads and Traffic Authority v Royal [2008] HCA 19.
Sarre, R. (2008). Fairness in trading: Trade practices law and school governance. AISSA School Board Governance Journal, 11, 1–4.
Sisters of the Holy Child Jesus at Old Westbury v. Corwin, 29 N.Y.S.3d 736 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016).
Smith v. Alameda Cnty. Social Servs. Agency, 153 Cal.Rptr. 712 (Cal. Ct. App. 1979).
Tokic, S. (2014). Rethinking educational malpractice: Are educators rock stars? Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal, 3(1), 105–133.
Torres v Little Flower, 485 N.Y.S.2d 15 (N.Y.1984).
Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth).
Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Canberra and Goulburn v Hadba [2005] HCA 31.
Weir v Geelong Grammar School (Civil Claims) [2012] VCAT 1736.
Williams v. Eady. (1893). 10 TLR 41 CA.
Wrongs Act (Vic) 1958.
Wyong Shire Council v Shirt (1980) 146 CLR 40.
Yee Tak On v Dr Linda Hort (ANU College) [2012] FMCA 391.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Teh, M.K., Russo, C.J. (2018). Educational Negligence: Is It a Viable Form of Action?. In: Trimmer, K., Dixon, R., S. Findlay, Y. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Education Law for Schools. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77751-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77751-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77750-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77751-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)