Advertisement

Mendeleev and Alpha Ridges

  • Victor V. Butsenko
  • Yury G. Firsov
  • Evgeny A. Gusev
  • Valery D. Kaminsky
  • Sergey P. Kashubin
  • Alexey L. Piskarev
  • Victor A. Poselov
Chapter

Abstract

The Mendeleev Ridge was formed on the continental crust with total thickness 27–32 km of which the upper crust takes 4–7 km. Continuous chain of progressively seaward deepening bathymetric terraces demonstrate the morphological connection of the Mendeleev Ridge with shallow water regions of the Siberian-Chukchi continental margin. Seismic data reveal that the structure and stratigraphy of the Mendeleev Ridge are affected by intensive normal faulting of acoustic basement creating complex system of grabens and half-grabens. It depicts the Mendeleev Ridge as an extensional structure of Cretaceous age illustrating tectonic evolution of the Central Arctic region. The Miocene-Pleistocene complex, with continuous undisturbed layers of hemipelagic sediments and regional erosional unconformity at its base, drapes the entire Mendeleev Ridge and marks the completion of contemporary morphological modern system of the Mendeleev-Alpha Ridge System.

Keywords

Mendeleev Ridge Alpha Ridge Sedimentary cover Extensional structure Continental crust Normal faults 

References

  1. Andronikov A, Mukasa S, Mayer LA et al (2008) First recovery of Submarine Basalts from the Chukchi Borderland and Alpha. Eos. Trans.AGU 89(53). Abstract V41D-2124Google Scholar
  2. Backman J, Moran K et al (2006) Sites M0001-M0004. Expedition 302 Scientists. Proceedings of the integrated ocean drilling program 302, p 169Google Scholar
  3. Backman J, Jakobsson M, Frank M et al (2008) Age model and core-seismic integration for the Cenozoic Arctic coring expedition sediments from the Lomonosov ridge. Paleoceanography J 23(1)Google Scholar
  4. Brumley K, Mayer LA, Miller EL et al (2008) Dredged rock samples from the alpha ridge, Arctic Ocean: implications for the tectonic history and origin of the Amerasian Basin. Eos Transactions American Geophysical Union, 15–19 December 2008Google Scholar
  5. Bruvoll V, Kristoffersen Y, Coakley B et al (2010) Hemipelagic deposits on the Mendeleev and northwestern alpha submarine ridges an the Arctic Ocean: acoustic stratigraphy, depositional environment and an inter-ridge correlation calibrated by ACEX results. Mar Geophys Res J 31:149–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bruvoll V, Kristoffersen Y, Coakley B et al (2012) The nature of the acoustic basement on Mendeleev and northwestern alpha ridges, Arctic Ocean. Tectonophysics J 514:123–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Franke D, Hinz K, Oncken O (2001) The Laptev Sea rift. Mar Pet Geol J 18:1083–1127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Funck T, Jackson HR, Dehler SA et al (2004) A refraction seismic transect from Greenland to Ellesmere Island, Canada: the crustal structure in Southern Nares Strait. Polarforschung J 74(1–3):97–112Google Scholar
  9. Glebovsky VY, Kovacs LC, Maschenkov SP et al (1998) Joint compilation of Russian and US navy aeromagnetic data in the Central Arctic Seas. Polarforshung J 68:35–40. (erschienen 2000)Google Scholar
  10. Grantz A, Scott RA, Drachev SS et al (2009) Map showing the sedimentary successions of the Arctic region (58°-64° to 90°N) that may be prospective for hydrocarbons. American Association of Petroleum Geologists GIS-UDRIL Open-File Spatial Library, TulsaGoogle Scholar
  11. Grantz A, Hart PE, Childers VA (2011) Geology and tectonic development of the Amerasia and Canada basins, Arctic Ocean. Geol Soc Lond Mem 35:771–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gurevich NI, Maschenkov SP (2000) The crustal types of geological structures in the deep-sea Arctic basin in: collected articles. Geology and geophysics of the Arctic region lithosphere, vol 3. VNIIOkeangeologia, Saint Petersburg, pp 9–32Google Scholar
  13. Jokat W, Ickrath M, O’Connor J (2013) Seismic transect across the Lomonosov and Mendeleev ridges: constraints on the geological evolution of the Amerasia Basin, Arctic Ocean. Geophys Res Lett 40(19):5047–5051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Karasik AM (1980) Strtucture and evolution of the of the Arctic Ocean floor in light of aeromangnetic data. Marine geology, sedimentology, petrography and ocean geology, pp 178–193. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  15. Kashubin SN, Petrov OV et al (2016) Deep structure of crust and the upper mantle of the Mendeleev rise on the Arktic-2012 DSS profile. Regionalnaya geologiya i metallogeniya J 65:16–36. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  16. Kazanin GS et al (2006) Some of the results of seismic exploration of the MCS survey in the Laptev sea. Abstracts of the international conference “Oil and gas of the Arctic shelf”. Murmansk. CD-RGoogle Scholar
  17. Kenyon S, Forsberg R (2001) Arctic gravity Projecta status. International Association of Geodesy Symposia 123:391–395Google Scholar
  18. Lebedeva-Ivanova NN, Zamansky YY (2006) Seismic profiling across the Mendeleev ridge at 82°N: evidence of continental crust. Geophys J Int 165(2):527–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Malyshev NA, Obmetko VV, Borodulin AA at al (2009) The Laptev Sea shelf sedimentary cover according to the newest information Geology of the Earth Polar Reigons: Proceedings of XLII Tectonic conference II:32–37Google Scholar
  20. Moran K, Backman J, Brinkhuis H et al (2006) The Cenozoic palaeoenvironment of the Arctic Ocean. Nature J 441:601–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morozov AF, Petrov OV, Shokalsky SP et al (2013) New geological data are confirming continental origin of the Central Arctic rises. Reg Geol Metallog J 52:2–25Google Scholar
  22. Piskarev AL (2004) The basement structure of the Eurasia Basin and central ridges in the Arctic Ocean. Geotektonics J 38(6):443–448Google Scholar
  23. Poselov VA, Avetisov GP, Butsenko VV et al (2012) The Lomonosov ridge as a natural extension of the Eurasian continental margin into the Arctic Basin. Geol Geophys J 53(12):1662–1680Google Scholar
  24. Poselov VA, Butsenko VV, Zholondz SM et al (2017) Seismic stratigraphy of sedimentary cover in the Podvodnikov Basin and North Chukchi trough. Dokl Earth Sci J 474(2):688–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Saltus RW, Miller EL, Gaina C (2011) Regional magnetic domains of the circum-Arctic: a framework for geodynamic interpretation. In: Spencer AM (ed) Arctic petroleum geology, vol 35. Geological Society of London, London, pp 49–60Google Scholar
  26. Verba VV, Fedorov VI (2006) Anomalous magnetic field over the Central Arctic uplifts the Amerasian Basin of the Arctic Ocean. Geophys J 28(5):95–103. (in Russian)Google Scholar
  27. Verhoef J, Roest WR, Macnab R et al (1996) Magnetic anomalies of the Arctic and North Atlantic oceans and adjacent land areas. Geol Surv Can., Open File 3125a:577Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor V. Butsenko
    • 1
  • Yury G. Firsov
    • 1
  • Evgeny A. Gusev
    • 1
  • Valery D. Kaminsky
    • 1
  • Sergey P. Kashubin
    • 2
  • Alexey L. Piskarev
    • 1
    • 3
  • Victor A. Poselov
    • 1
  1. 1.All-Russian Research Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources of the World Ocean (VNIIOkeangeologia)Saint PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.A.P. Karpinsky Russian Geological Research Institute (VSEGEI)Saint PetersburgRussia
  3. 3.Saint Petersburg UniversitySaint PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations