Advertisement

Ontological Support for Process-Oriented Competency Management

  • Ilona Pawełoszek
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 311)

Abstract

Over the last few decades process-oriented approach has become an essential standard for many companies. This situation requires a new outlook on competency management. The competencies of employees should be considered in the framework of tasks implemented within the business process. According to the author’s observations, the greatest challenge is the lack of a consistent view of the overall aspects of human resources in conjunction with business process flow. In particular there is a gap between the process models defined in BPM systems and the competency descriptions defined in HR systems. The aim of this paper is to propose a solution based on a on Software Competence Ontology designed by the author, which can be used to support process-oriented competency management in a software development company. The primary purpose of the solution is to facilitate finding the best contractors to perform the business process tasks. With this purpose in mind a method of comparing candidates’ skills and knowledge was developed. The presented approach can be useful in process-based and virtual organizations where the environment is dynamic and frequent changes are needed to preserve the company’s competitiveness and agility. An example proposal of practical implementation of ontology-enhanced business process model was presented and illustrated by the process of software configuration management.

Keywords

Competency management Ontology Process approach 

References

  1. 1.
    Różewski, P., Małachowski, B., Danczura, P.: Concept of competence management system for Polish National Qualification Framework in the Computer Science area. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek. L.A., Paprzycki, M. (eds.) FedCSIS, pp. 759–765 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vakola, M., Soderquist, K.E., Prastacos, G.P.: Competency management in support of organisational change. Int. J. Manpow. 28(3/4), 260–275 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Osa, J.O.: Managing the 21st century reference department: competencies. Ref. Libr. 39, 35–50 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lundqvist, K.O., Baker, K., Williams, S.: An ontological approach to competency management. In: Proceedings of the iLearn 2007, pp. 1–4 (2007). http://www.eife-l.org/publications/proceedings/ilf07/Contribution110.doc.pdf
  5. 5.
    Hammer, M.: The process audit. Harv. Bus. Rev. 85(4), 111–123 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harmon, P.: The state of business process management. A BPTrends Report. https://www.bptrends.com/bpt/wp-content/uploads/2015-BPT-Survey-Report.pdf
  7. 7.
    Wysłocka, E.: Implementation of enterprise processes to IT solution for company. WSEAS Trans. Bus. Econ. 14, 225–234 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kohlbacher, M., Gruenwald, S.: Process orientation: conceptualization and measurement. Bus. Proc. Manag. J. 17(2), 267–283 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151111122347 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kohlbacher, M.: The effects of process orientation: a literature review. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 16(1), 135–152 (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151011017985 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lorino, P.: A pragmatic and interpretive approach to competence-based management: the case of a telecommunications company. In: Sanchez, R. (ed.) A Focused Issue on Fundamental Issues in Competence Theory Development. Research in Competence-Based Management, vol. 4, pp. 219–257 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leyking, K., Angeli, R.: Model-based competency-oriented, business process analysis. Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Arch. J. 4(1), 14–25 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nolte, A., Sprafke, N., Wiechers, M., Herrmann, T.: Integration von Kompetenz- und Prozessmanagement – Eine Chance für Mitarbeiter und Organisationen. In: GfA (Hrsg.), Arbeit in komplexen Systemen. Digital, vernetzt, human?!, pp. 1–6. GfA Press, Dortmund (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Giorgini, F., Zimmermann, V., Faltin, N., Vervenne, L.: Time2Competence: the PROLIX project. In: Nejdl, W., Tochtermann, K. (eds.) EC-TEL 2006. LNCS, vol. 4227, pp. 597–602. Springer, Heidelberg (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/11876663_59 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    ISO 10303-203:1994: Information technology – object management group business process model and notation (1994)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rodríguez, A., Caro, A., Cappiello, C., Caballero, I.: A BPMN extension for including data quality requirements in business process modeling. In: Mendling, J., Weidlich, M. (eds.) BPMN 2012. LNBIP, vol. 125, pp. 116–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33155-8_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bocciarelli, P., D’Ambrogio, A.: A BPMN extension for modeling non functional properties of business processes. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Symposium on Theory of Modeling & Simulation: DEVS Integrative M & S Symposium, TMS-DEVS 2011, pp. 160–168. Society for Computer Simulation International, San Diego (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Altuhhova, O., Matulevicius, R., Ahmed, N.: An extension of business process model and notation for security risk management. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Model. Des. 4(4), 93–113 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Braun, R., Esswein, W.: Classification of domain-specific BPMN extensions. In: Frank, U., Loucopoulos, P., Pastor, Ó., Petrounias, I. (eds.) PoEM 2014. LNBIP, vol. 197, pp. 42–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-45501-2_4 Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stroppi, L.J.R., Chiotti, O., Villarreal, P.D.: Extending BPMN 2.0: method and tool support. In: Dijkman, R., Hofstetter, J., Koehler, J. (eds.) BPMN 2011. LNBIP, vol. 95, pp. 59–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25160-3_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sucre, F.S., Pernalete-Chirinos, D.: Ontological framework for the management of job profiles based on labor competencies. GECONTEC: Revista Internacional de Gestión del Conocimiento y la Tecnología 5(1), 17–41 (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kimble, C., de Vasconcelos, J.B., Rocha, Á.: Competence management in knowledge intensive organizations using consensual knowledge and ontologies. Inf. Syst. Front. 18(6), 1119–1130 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Toader, E.A.: Competency-based assessment of IT professionals as a software organization tool. In: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education, Bucharest, vol. 3, pp. 13–20 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.12753/2066-026x-17-181
  23. 23.
    Ortega-Gonzalez, Y., Carli, G., Grandi, A., Delgado-Fernández M.: The specification of competency questions: an ontological support to match business processes, it and competences of professionals. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, pp. 531–539. University of Insubria, Italy (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Janev, V., Vranes, S.: Ontology-based competency management: the case study of the Mihajlo Pupin Institute. J. Univers. Comput. Sci. 17(7), 1089–1108 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    IMS Global Learning Consortium: IMS Reusable Definition of Competency or Educational Objective Specification (2017). https://www.imsglobal.org/competencies/
  26. 26.
    HR-XML Consortium: Competencies (Measurable Characteristics) Recommendation (2004). http://www.ec.tuwien.ac.at/~dorn/Courses/KM/Resources/hrxml/HR-XML-2_3/CPO/Competencies.html
  27. 27.
    InLOC: Integrating Learning Outcomes and Competences (2017). http://www.cetis.org.uk/inloc/Home
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    European e-Competence Framework: A common European framework for ICT Professionals in all industry sectors (2016). http://www.ecompetences.eu
  30. 30.
    SFIA Version 7 (2017). https://www.sfia-online.org/en
  31. 31.
    ITCM: The Information Technology Competency Model (2018). www.careeronestop.org/competencymodel
  32. 32.
    Hawthorne, E., Campbell, R., Tang, C., Tucker, C., Nichols, J.: ITC ACM. Competency Model of Core Learning Outcomes and Assessment for Associate-Degree Curriculum (2014)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    UNESCO ICT-CFT: UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers, version 2 (2011)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Masseroli, M., Tagliasacchi, M.: Web resources for gene list analysis in biomedicine. In: Lazakidou, A. (ed.) Web-Based Applications in Health Care and Biomedicine. Annals of Information Systems Series, vol. 7, pp. 117–141. Springer, Heidelberg (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1274-9_8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Aussenac-Gilles, N., Biébow, B., Szulman, S.: Corpus analysis for conceptual modeling. In: Proceedings of the EKAW 2000 Workshop on Ontologies and Texts, Juan-les-Pins, French Riviera, vol. 51 (2000)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gomez Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R.: Overview of knowledge sharing and reuse components: ontologies and problem-solving methods. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontologies and Problem-Solving Methods KRR5 IJCAI 1999, Stockholm, Sweden (1999)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kassel, G.: OntoSpec: une méthode de spécification semi-informelle d’ontologies. In: Proceedings of IC2002, Rouen, France, pp. 75–87 (2002)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Uschold, M., Gruninger, M.: Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. J. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 112, 93–155 (1996).  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888900007797 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dudycz, H., Korczak, J.: Process of ontology design for business intelligence system. In: Ziemba, E. (ed.) Information Technology for Management. LNBIP, vol. 243, pp. 17–28. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30528-8_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    White, S., Miers, D.: BPMN Modeling and Reference Guide: Understanding and Using BPMN. Future Strategies Inc., Lighthouse Point (2008)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rekik, M., Boukadi, K., Ben-Abdallah, H.: Specifying business process outsourcing requirements. In: Lorenz, P., Cardoso, J., Maciaszek, Leszek A., van Sinderen, M. (eds.) ICSOFT 2015. CCIS, vol. 586, pp. 175–190. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30142-6_10 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
  43. 43.
  44. 44.
    Pawełoszek, I.: Process-oriented approach to competency management using ontologies. In: Ganzha, M., Maciaszek, L., Paprzycki M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems. ACSIS, vol. 11, pp. 1005–1013 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.15439/2017f441
  45. 45.
    Princeton University: About WordNet (2010). http://wordnet.princeton.edu
  46. 46.
    Pedersen, T., Patwardhan, S., Michelizzi, J.: WordNet: similarity - measuring the relatedness of concepts. In: AAAI 2004, pp. 1024–1025, San Jose, CA (2004)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
  48. 48.
  49. 49.
    Leon, A.: Software Configuration Management Handbook, 3rd edn. Artech House, Boston/London (2015)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Farah, J.: Defining a Software Configuration Management Process to Improve Quality (2012). https://www.cmcrossroads.com/article/next-generation-process-and-quality-0
  51. 51.
    Muszyńska, K.: Patterns of communication management in project teams. In: Ziemba, E. (ed.) AITM/ISM 2016. LNBIP, vol. 277, pp. 202–221. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53076-5_11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Częstochowa University of TechnologyCzęstochowaPoland

Personalised recommendations