Skip to main content

How Different Versions of Layout and Complexity of Web Forms Affect Users After They Start It? A Pilot Experience

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST'18 2018)

Abstract

This paper presents a research work that analyzes the effect of redirecting users between two different versions of a web form after they have started the questionnaire. In this case, we used a web form proposed by the Spanish Observatory for Employability and Employment (OEEU) that is designed to gather information from Spanish graduates. These two versions are different as follows: one of them is very simple and the other one includes several changes that appeared in the literature related to users’ trust, usability/user experience and layout design. To test the effect of redirecting users between both versions of the web form, we used a group of users that already have started the questionnaire and redirect them to the other version; this is, we changed the web form version they use to the other version and measure how this change affects them. This experiment has shown some promising results, which lead to enhance and extend the experience to bigger populations and other kind of changes in the user interfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dillman, D.A.: Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Wiley, New York (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Jarrett, C., Gaffney, G.: Forms That Work: Designing Web Forms for Usability. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seckler, M., Heinz, S., Forde, S., Tuch, A.N., Opwis, K.: Trust and distrust on the web: user experiences and website characteristics. Comput. Hum. Behav. 45, 39–50 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stieger, S., Reips, U.-D.: What are participants doing while filling in an online questionnaire: a paradata collection tool and an empirical study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 1488–1495 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kveton, P., Jelínek, M., Klimusová, H., Voboril, D.: Data collection on the internet: evaluation of web-based questionnaires. Studia Psychol. 49, 81 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Flavián, C., Gurrea, R., Orús, C.: The effect of product presentation mode on the perceived content and continent quality of web sites. Online Inf. Rev. 33, 1103–1128 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Seckler, M., Tuch, A.N., Opwis, K., Bargas-Avila, J.A.: User-friendly locations of error messages in web forms: put them on the right side of the erroneous input field. Interact. Comput. 24, 107–118 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bargas-Avila, J.A., Brenzikofer, O., Tuch, A.N., Roth, S.P., Opwis, K.: Working towards usable forms on the worldwide web: optimizing multiple selection interface elements. Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2011, 4 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bargas-Avila, J., Brenzikofer, O.: Simple but crucial user interfaces in the world wide web: introducing 20 guidelines for usable web form design (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson, S.P.: Seductive Interaction Design: Creating Playful, Fun, and Effective User Experiences, Portable Document. Pearson Education, Berkeley (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shneiderman, B.: Designing trust into online experiences. Commun. ACM 43, 57–59 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. ISO/DIS: Draft BS ENISO 9241-220 Ergonomics of human-computer interaction. Part 220: Processes for enabling, executing and assessing human-centred design within organizations (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. ISO/DIS: Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 125: Guidance on visual presentation of Information (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cruz-Benito, J., Therón, R., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Sánchez-Prieto, J.C., Vázquez-Ingelmo, A., Martín-González, M., Martínez, J.M.: Improving success/completion ratio in large surveys: a proposal based on usability and engagement. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Learning and Collaboration Technologies, LCT 2017, Technology in Education, Held as Part of HCI International 2017, 9–14 July 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Part II, pp. 352–370. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Cruz-Benito, J., Vázquez-Ingelmo, A., Sánchez-Prieto, J.C., Therón, R., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Martín-González, M.: Enabling adaptability in web forms based on user characteristics detection through A/B testing and machine learning. IEEE Access 5, 2251–2265 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Michavila, F., Martínez, J.M., Martín-González, M., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Cruz-Benito, J.: Barómetro de Empleabilidad y Empleo de los Universitarios en España, 2015 (Primer informe de resultados) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Recabarren, M., Nussbaum, M.: Exploring the feasibility of web form adaptation to users’ cultural dimension scores. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 20, 87–108 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huber, W., Vitouch, P.: Usability and accessibility on the internet: effects of accessible web design on usability. In: International Conference on Computers for Handicapped Persons, pp. 482–489. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pengnate, S.F., Sarathy, R.: An experimental investigation of the influence of website emotional design features on trust in unfamiliar online vendors. Comput. Hum. Behav. 67, 49–60 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from “la Caixa” Foundation. The author Juan Cruz-Benito would like to thank the European Social Fund and the Consejería de Educación of the Junta de Castilla y León (Spain) for funding his predoctoral fellow contract. This research has been cofounded by the University of Salamanca through the program of financial aid for the predoctoral contract of José Carlos Sánchez-Prieto (Programa III: Ayudas para contratos Predoctorales) cofounded by Banco Santander. This work has been partially funded by the Spanish Government Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness throughout the DEFINES project (Ref. TIN2016-80172-R).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Cruz-Benito .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cruz-Benito, J., Sánchez-Prieto, J.C., Vázquez-Ingelmo, A., Therón, R., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Martín-González, M. (2018). How Different Versions of Layout and Complexity of Web Forms Affect Users After They Start It? A Pilot Experience. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Costanzo, S. (eds) Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST'18 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 746. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77712-2_92

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77712-2_92

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77711-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77712-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics