Defining a Collaborative Platform to Report Machine State

  • Diogo Martinho
  • João Carneiro
  • Asif Mohammed
  • Ana Vieira
  • Isabel Praça
  • Goreti Marreiros
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 746)

Abstract

Nowadays, we are seeing the evolution of Industry, and with it, the development of technological solutions that can assure sustainability and competitiveness in the manufacturing environment. Along this evolution, Cyber Physical Systems were developed with the goal to merge both physical and computational processes and to allow predictive, proactive and collaborative maintenance of industrial machines. The work here presented has been integrated in the Cyber Physical System based Proactive Collaborative Maintenance (MANTIS) project and has the main goal of proposing a collaborative platform to report current machine state. This way, it will be possible to facilitate and support the interaction between all stakeholders that will participate in the collaborative decision-making process. With this approach we believe to be possible to reduce machine down-time and the unnecessary waste of machine components and workhand while attempting to solve different machine problems.

Keywords

Industry Collaborative Decision-Making Human machine interfaces Multi-agent systems Cyber Physical Systems 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research work was partially supported by national funds via the FCT Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia and funds provided by the European Commission in the scope of ECSEL/H2020-662189 MANTIS RTD project (Project ID: 662189) and from FEDER Funds through COMPETE program and from National Funds through FCT under the project UID/EEA/00760/2013.

References

  1. 1.
    Feng, S.C., Joung, C.-B., Li, G.: Development overview of sustainable manufacturing metrics. In: Proceedings of the 17th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, vol. 6 (2010) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jin, X., Weiss, B.A., Siegel, D., Lee, J.: Present status and future growth of advanced maintenance technology and strategy in US manufacturing. Int. J. Prognostics Health Manage. 7, 12 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sipsas, K., Alexopoulos, K., Xanthakis, V., Chryssolouris, G.: Collaborative maintenance in flow-line manufacturing environments: an Industry 4.0 approach. Procedia CIRP 55, 236–241 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stock, T., Seliger, G.: Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP 40, 536–541 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Coble, J., Ramuhalli, P., Bond, L.J., Hines, J., Ipadhyaya, B.: A review of prognostics and health management applications in nuclear power plants. Int. J. Prognostics Health Manage. 6, 016 (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abu-Samah, A., Shahzad, M.K., Zamaı, E., Hubac, S.: Effective maintenance by reducing failure-cause misdiagnosis in semiconductor industry (SI). PHM J. 6, 1–18 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferreira, L.L., Albano, M., Silva, J., Martinho, D., Marreiros, G., di Orio, G., Maló, P., Ferreira, H.: A pilot for proactive maintenance in industry 4.0. In: 2017 IEEE 13th International Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS), pp. 1–9 (2017)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jazdi, N.: Cyber physical systems in the context of Industry 4.0. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on Automation, Quality and Testing, Robotics, pp. 1–4 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jantunen, E., Zurutuza, U., Albano, M., di Orio, G., Maló, P., Hegedus, C.: The way cyber physical systems will revolutionise maintenance. In: 30th Conference on Condition Monitoring and Diagnostic Engineering Management (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flipse, S.M., Van der Sanden, M.C., Osseweijer, P.: Setting up spaces for collaboration in industry between researchers from the natural and social sciences. Sci. Eng. Ethics 20, 7–22 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schätz, B., Törngreen, M., Bensalem, S., Cengarle, M., Pfeifer, H., McDermid, J., Passerone, R., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A.: Cyber-physical European roadmap and strategy: research agenda and recommendations for action. CyPhERS, Technical report (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Charalambous, G., Fletcher, S., Webb, P.: Identifying the key organisational human factors for introducing human-robot collaboration in industry: an exploratory study. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 81, 2143–2155 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fischer, M., Sciarini, P.: Drivers of collaboration in political decision making: a cross-sector perspective. J. Politics 78, 63–74 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ferber, J.: Multi-agent Systems: An Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leitão, P.: Agent-based distributed manufacturing control: a state-of-the-art survey. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intel. 22, 979–991 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paolucci, M., Sacile, R.: Agent-Based Manufacturing and Control Systems: New Agile Manufacturing Solutions for Achieving Peak Performance. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2016)MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang, S., Wan, J., Zhang, D., Li, D., Zhang, C.: Towards smart factory for Industry 4.0: a self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination. Comput. Netw. 101, 158–168 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Avci, M.G., Selim, H.: A multi-agent system model for supply chains with lateral preventive transshipments: application in a multi-national automotive supply chain. Comput. Indus. 82, 28–39 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hernández, J.E., Mula, J., Poler, R., Lyons, A.C.: Collaborative planning in multi-tier supply chains supported by a negotiation-based mechanism and multi-agent system. Group Decis. Negot. 23, 235–269 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jantunen, E., Zurutuza, U., Ferreira, L.L., Varga, P.: Optimising maintenance: what are the expectations for cyber physical systems. In: 3rd International Workshop on Emerging Ideas and Trends in Engineering of Cyber-Physical Systems (EITEC), pp. 53–58 (2016)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Starr, A., Al-Najjar, B., Holmberg, K., Jantunen, E., Bellew, J., Albarbar, A.: Maintenance today and future trends. In: E-maintenance, pp. 5–37 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GECAD, Institute of Engineering, Polytechnic of PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.ADIRA Metal-Forming SolutionsVila Nova de GaiaPortugal

Personalised recommendations