Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies

WorldCIST'18 2018: Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies pp 1188–1197Cite as

Towards a Conceptual Framework for the Evaluation of Telemedicine Satisfaction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 746))

Abstract

Satisfaction is a key factor in evaluating the success of telemedicine systems. The objective of this research is to develop a conceptual framework to aid research in telemedicine satisfaction. This research performs a developmental review of the telemedicine satisfaction literature obtained from PubMed and Google Scholar. Results are synthesized by reviewers using a concept matrix. Findings support a conceptual framework for telemedicine satisfaction that includes: satisfaction dimensions, stakeholders, type of care, type of system, context and methodologies. The framework can be used by future studies for examining and reporting on telemedicine satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sood, S., et al.: What is telemedicine? a collection of 104 peer-reviewed perspectives and theoretical underpinnings. Telemed. e-health 13(5), 573–590 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kidholm, K., et al.: A model for assessment of telemedicine applications: mast. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 28(1), 44–51 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Axelsson, K., Melin, U.: Contextual factors influencing health information systems implementation in public sector–investigating the explanatory power of critical success factors. In: International Conference on Electronic Government. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Templier, M., Paré, G.: A Framework for Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ekeland, A.G., Bowes, A., Flottorp, S.: Methodologies for assessing telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Int. J. Med. Inf. 81(1), 1–11 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maillet, É., Mathieu, L., Sicotte, C.: Modeling factors explaining the acceptance, actual use and satisfaction of nurses using an electronic patient record in acute care settings: an extension of the UTAUT. Int. J. Med. Inf. 84(1), 36–47 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Imenda, S.: Is there a conceptual difference between theoretical and conceptual frameworks? Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi J. Soc. Sci. 38(2), 185–195 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saliba, V., et al.: Telemedicine across borders: a systematic review of factors that hinder or support implementation. Int. J. Med. Inf. 81(12), 793–809 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wade, V.A., et al.: A systematic review of economic analyses of telehealth services using real time video communication. BMC health serv. Res. 10(1), 1 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu, P.J., et al.: Examining the technology acceptance model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 16(2), 91–112 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Chau, P.Y., Hu, P.J.H.: Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach. Decis. Sci. 32(4), 699–719 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jansen-Kosterink, S., Vollenbroek-Hutten, M., Hermens, H.: A renewed framework for the evaluation of telemedicine. In: 8th International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine: eTELEMED, Venice, Italy (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ekeland, A.G., Grøttland, A.: Assessment of MAST in European patient-centered telemedicine pilots. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 31(5), 304–311 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kidholm, K., et al.: The model for assessment of telemedicine (MAST): a scoping review of empirical studies. J. Telemed. Telecare 23(9), 803–813 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Whitten, P.S., Mackert, M.S.: Addressing telehealth’s foremost barrier: provider as initial gatekeeper. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 21(04), 517–521 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Linder-Pelz, S., Struening, E.L.: The multidimensionality of patient satisfaction with a clinic visit. J. Community Health 10(1), 42–54 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Menachemi, N., Burke, D.E., Ayers, D.J.: Factors affecting the adoption of telemedicine–a multiple adopter perspective. J. Med. Syst. 28(6), 617–632 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Williams, T.L., May, C.R., Esmail, A.: Limitations of patient satisfaction studies in telehealthcare: a systematic review of the literature. Telemed. J. e-Health 7(4), 293–316 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chou, C.-Y., Brauer, D.J.: Temperament and satisfaction with health status among persons with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Nurse Spec. 19(2), 94–100 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vaezi, R., et al.: User satisfaction research in information systems: historical roots and approaches. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 38(27), 501–532 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mair, F., Whitten, P.: Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ 320(7248), 1517–1520 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Masino, C., Lam, T.C.: Choice of rating scale labels: implication for minimizing patient satisfaction response ceiling effect in telemedicine surveys. Telemed. e-Health 20(12), 1150–1155 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Whitten, P., Love, B.: Patient and provider satisfaction with the use of telemedicine: overview and rationale for cautious enthusiasm. J. Postgrad. Med. 51(4), 294 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kifle, M., et al.: Transfer and adoption of advanced information technology solutions in resource-poor environments: the case of telemedicine systems adoption in Ethiopia. Telemed. e-health 16(3), 327–343 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Finkelstein, S.M., et al.: Telehomecare: quality, perception, satisfaction. Telemed. J. e-health 10(2), 122–128 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Weatherburn, G., et al.: An assessment of parental satisfaction with mode of delivery of specialist advice for paediatric cardiology: face-to-face versus videoconference. J. Telemed. Telecare 12(suppl 1), 57–59 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, S., et al.: Patient Satisfaction Evaluation of Telemedicine Applications Is Not Satisfactory. In: 13th Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2013. Springer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kraai, I.H., et al.: Heart failure patients monitored with telemedicine: patient satisfaction, a review of the literature. J. Cardiac Fail. 17(8), 684–690 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bakken, S., et al.: Development, validation, and use of English and Spanish versions of the telemedicine satisfaction and usefulness questionnaire. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 13(6), 660–667 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Van den Berg, M.H., Schoones, J.W., Vlieland, T.P.V.: Internet-based physical activity interventions: a systematic review of the literature. J. Med. Internet Res. 9(3), e26 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Webster, J., Watson, R.T.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Q. 26(2), 13–23 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kruse, C.S., et al.: Telehealth and patient satisfaction: a systematic review and narrative analysis. BMJ Open 7(8), e016242 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mounessa, J.S., et al.: A systematic review of satisfaction with teledermatology. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 1357633X17696587 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hubley, S., et al.: Review of key telepsychiatry outcomes. World J. Psychiatry 6(2), 269 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Harrison, S., et al.: Are patients with diabetes mellitus satisfied with technologies used to assist with diabetes management and coping?: a structured review. Diab. Technol. Ther. 16(11), 771–783 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Whitten, P.S., Mair, F.: Telemedicine and patient satisfaction: current status and future directions. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 6(4), 417–423 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Collins, K., Nicolson, P., Bowns, I.: Patient satisfaction in telemedicine. Health Inf. J. 6(2), 81–85 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Hasselberg, M., et al.: Image-based medical expert teleconsultation in acute care of injuries. A systematic review of effects on information accuracy, diagnostic validity, clinical outcome, and user satisfaction. PLoS One 9(6), e98539 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Piga, M., et al.: Telemedicine for patients with rheumatic diseases: Systematic review and proposal for research agenda. In: Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. Elsevier, Rockville (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Iseli, M.A., Kunz, R., Blozik, E.: Instruments to assess patient satisfaction after teleconsultation and triage: a systematic review. Patient Prefer. adherence 8, 893 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Leibowitz, R., Day, S., Dunt, D.: A systematic review of the effect of different models of after-hours primary medical care services on clinical outcome, medical workload, and patient and GP satisfaction. Fam. Pract. 20(3), 311–317 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, USA

    Robert Garcia & Olayele Adelakun

Authors
  1. Robert Garcia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Olayele Adelakun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olayele Adelakun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Engenharia Informática, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal

    Álvaro Rocha

  2. College of Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA

    Hojjat Adeli

  3. DSI/EEUM, Universidade do Minho, Guimarães, Portugal

    Luís Paulo Reis

  4. DIMES, Universita della Calabria, Arcavacata di Rende, Italy

    Sandra Costanzo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Garcia, R., Adelakun, O. (2018). Towards a Conceptual Framework for the Evaluation of Telemedicine Satisfaction. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L., Costanzo, S. (eds) Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST'18 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 746. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77712-2_114

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77712-2_114

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77711-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77712-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation