SOCIAL Platform

  • Manuel Sousa
  • Luísa Arieira
  • Alexandra Queirós
  • Ana Isabel Martins
  • Nelson Pacheco Rocha
  • Filipe Augusto
  • Filipa Duarte
  • Telmo Neves
  • António Damasceno
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 746)


This paper presents the project Social Cooperation for Integrated Assisted Living (SOCIAL), which aims at the development of a platform of ehealth applications to support the care networks of community-dwelling older adults. First the requirements of the SOCIAL platform are discussed, and then the high level system architecture is presented.


Older adults ehealth Residential care Integrated care 



This work was supported by Sistema de Incentivos à Investigação e Desenvolvimento Tecnológico (SI I&DT) of the Programa Portugal 2020, through Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalização and/or Programa Operacional do Centro do FEDER - Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional, under Social Cooperation for Integrated Assisted Living (SOCIAL), project number 017861.


  1. 1.
    Moorhead, S.A., Hazlett, D.E., Harrison, L., Carroll, J.K., Irwin, A., Hoving, C.: A new dimension of health care: systematic review of the uses, benefits, and limitations of social media for health communication. J. Med. Internet Res. 15, e85 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boggatz, T., Meinhart, C.M.: Health promotion among older adults in Austria: a qualitative study. J. Clin. Nurs. 26, 1106–1118 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shingleton, R.M., Palfai, T.P.: Technology-delivered adaptations of motivational interviewing for health-related behaviors: a systematic review of the current research. Patient Educ. Couns. 99, 17–35 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Conway, A., Inglis, S.C., Clark, R.A.: Effective technologies for non-invasive remote monitoring in heart failure. Telemed. e-Health 20(6), 531–538 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rashidi, P., Mihailidis, A.: A survey on ambient-assisted living tools for older adults. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 17(3), 579–590 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tildesley, H.D., Po, M.D., Ross, S.A.: Internet blood glucose monitoring systems provide lasting glycemic benefit in type 1 and 2 diabetes. Med. Clin. North Am. 99, 17–33 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arambepola, C., Ricci-Cabello, I., Manikavasagam, P., Roberts, N., French, D.P., Farmer, A.: The impact of automated brief messages promoting lifestyle changes delivered via mobile devices to people with type 2 diabetes: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. J. Med. Internet Res. 18, e86 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beishuizen, C.R., Stephan, B.C., Gool, W.A.V., Brayne, C., Peters, R.J., Andrieu, S., Kivipelto, M., Soininen, H., Busschers, W.B., Charante, E.P.M.V., Richard, E.: Web-based interventions targeting cardiovascular risk factors in middle-aged and older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 18, e55 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Richards, D., Richardson, T.: Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 32, 329–342 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Queirós, A., Carvalho, S., Pavão, J., Da Rocha, N.P.: AAL information based services and care integration. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Health Informatics - HEALTHINF 2013, pp. 403–406 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hawley-Hague, H., Boulton, E., Hall, A., Pfeiffer, K., Todd, C.: Older adults’ perceptions of technologies aimed at falls prevention, detection or monitoring: a systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform. 83, 416–426 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Awolusi, I., Marks, E., Hallowell, M.: Wearable technology for personalized construction safety monitoring and trending: Review of applicable devices. Autom. Constr. 85, 96–106 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blobel, B.: Co-production of health enabled by next generation personal health systems. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Wearable Micro and Nano Technologies for Personalized Health. IOS Press (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alvarelhao, J., Silva, A., Martins, A., Queirós, A., Amaro, A., Rocha, N., Lains, J.: Comparing the content of instruments assessing environmental factors using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J. Rehabil. Med. 44(1), 1–6 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cameron, A., Lart, R., Bostock, L., Coomber, C.: Factors that promote and hinder joint and integrated working between health and social care services: a review of research literature. Health Soc. Care Commun. 22(3), 225–233 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.KentratechMatosinhosPortugal
  2. 2.Universidade de AveiroAveiroPortugal
  3. 3.DigitalwindAveiroPortugal
  4. 4.Instituto Pedro NunesCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations