Advertisement

Green Building as Urban Sustainability Transitions

  • Julia Affolderbach
  • Christian Schulz
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

Over the past decade, the term transitions has been adopted widely in policy and academic circles, and notions of green transitions, sustainability transitions and low-carbon transitions now frequently replace the common Leitbild of sustainable development in local, regional and national visions and analyses. Transition studies present one particular approach to analysing and understanding fundamental changes in societies. While transition studies originally comprised historic and technocentric innovation studies that considered sociocultural dimensions as enabling context for change, the multi-level framework developed in transition studies has been recently adopted and adapted by economic and urban geographers resulting in a focus on urban transitions. The multi-level perspective in particular provides a compelling heuristic for the assessment of sustainability transitions. This chapter introduces work in transition studies and discusses the strengths and limitations of the multi-level perspective in analysing shifts in green building as urban climate change mitigation strategy. It develops a transition perspective for the green building sector that focuses on the urban in these transition processes.

Keywords

Transition studies Multi-level perspective Local contexts Trajectories of transformation Innovation 

References

  1. Avelino F, Wittmayer JM (2015) Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: a multi-actor perspective. J Environ Policy Plann 18(5):628–649.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2015.1112259 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey I, Hopkins R, Wilson G (2010) Some things old, some things new: the spatial representations and politics of change of the peak oil relocalisation movement. Geoforum 41(4):595–605.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binz C, Truffer B, Coenen L (2014) Why space matters in technological innovation systems—mapping global knowledge dynamics of membrane bioreactor technology. Res Policy 43(1):138–155.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bridge G, Bouzarovski S, Bradshaw M, Eyre N (2013) Geographies of energy transition: space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy 53:331–340.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bulkeley H, Betsill M (2005) Rethinking sustainable cities: multilevel governance and the ‘urban’ politics of climate change. Environ Polit 14(1):42–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bulkeley H, Castán Broto V, Hodson M, Marvin S (eds) (2011) Cities and low carbon transitions. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Bulkeley H, Castán Broto V, Maassen A (2014) Low-carbon transitions and the reconfiguration of urban infrastructure. Urban Stud 51(7):1471–1486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coenen L, Truffer B (2012) Places and spaces of sustainability transitions: geographical contributions to an emerging research and policy field. Eur Plann Stud 20(3):367–374.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.651802 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coenen L, Raven R, Verbong G (2010) Local niche experimentation in energy transitions: a theoretical and empirical exploration of proximity advantages and disadvantages. Technol Soc 32(4):295–302.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2010.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coenen L, Benneworth P, Truffer B (2012) Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Res Policy 41(6):968–979.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooke P (2011) Transition regions: regional–national eco-innovation systems and strategies. Prog Plann 76(3):105–146.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2011.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coutard O, Rutherford J (2011) Post-networked cities : recombining infrastructural ecological and urban transitions. In: Bulkeley H, Castán Broto V, Hodson M, Marvin S (eds) Cities and low carbon transitions, vol 107-125. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Davies AR (2013) Cleantech clusters: transformational assemblages for a just, green economy or just business as usual? Glob Environ Chang 23(5):1285–1295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dewald U, Fromhold-Eisebith M (2015) Trajectories of sustainability transitions in scale-transcending innovation systems: the case of photovoltaics. Environ Innov Soc Trans 17:110–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Elzen B, Geels FW, Green K (2004) System innovation and the transition to sustainability: theory, evidence and policy. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evans J (2011) Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. Trans Inst Br Geogr 36(2):223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Evers A (2008) Hybrid organisations. Background, concept, challenges. In: Osborne SP (ed) The third sector in Europe. Prospects and challenges. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 279–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fuenfschilling L, Truffer B (2014) The structuration of socio-technical regimes—conceptual foundations from institutional theory. Res Policy 43(4):772–791.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31:1257–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geels FW (2011) The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environ Innov Soc Trans 1(1):24–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geels F, Sovacool BK, Schwanen T, Sorrell S (2017) Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. Science 357(6357):1242–1244.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao3760 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gibbs D, O’Neill K (2014) The green economy, sustainability transitions and transition regions: a case study of Boston. Geogr Ann Ser B 96(3):201–216.  https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hansen T, Coenen L (2015) The geography of sustainability transitions: review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environ Innov Soc Trans 17:92–109.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Healy A, Morgan K (2012) Spaces of innovation: learning, proximity and the ecological turn. Reg Stud 46(8):1041–1053.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.672725 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hodson M, Marvin S (2010) World cities and climate change. Open University Press, MaidenheadGoogle Scholar
  26. Hodson M, Marvin S (2011) Making low carbon Britain: everyday or elite transition? Paper presented at the International workshop on everyday infrastructures, Durham, 5 May 2011Google Scholar
  27. Hodson M, Marvin S (2012) Mediating low-carbon urban transitions? Forms of organization, knowledge and action. Eur Plann Stud 20(3):421–439.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.651804 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hodson M, Geels F, McMeekin A (2017) Reconfiguring urban sustainability transitions, analysing multiplicity. Sustainability 9(2).  https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoffman J, Loeber A (2015) Exploring the micro-politics in transitions from a practice perspective: the case of greenhouse innovation in the Netherlands. J Environ Policy Plann 18(5):692–711.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2015.1113514 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kenis A, Bono F, Mathijs E (2016) Unravelling the (post-)political in transition management: interrogating pathways towards sustainable change. J Environ Policy Plann 18(5):568–584.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2016.1141672 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. König A (ed) (2013) regenerative sustainable development of universities and cities: the role of living laboratories. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  32. Lawhon M, Murphy JT (2012) Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: insights from political ecology. Prog Hum Geogr 36(3):354–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Longhurst N (2013) The emergence of an alternative milieu: conceptualising the nature of alternative places. Environ Plann A 45(9):2100–2119.  https://doi.org/10.1068/a45487 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Longhurst N (2015) Towards an ‘alternative’ geography of innovation: alternative milieu, socio-cognitive protection and sustainability experimentation. Environ Innov Soc Trans 17:183–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCauley SM, Stephens JC (2012) Green energy clusters and socio-technical transitions: analysis of a sustainable energy cluster for regional economic development in Central Massachusetts, USA. Sustain Sci 7(2):213–225.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-012-0164-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meadowcroft J (2011) Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environ Innov Soc Trans 1(1):70–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moore T, Horne R, Morrissey J (2014) Zero emission housing: policy development in Australia and comparisons with the EU, UK, USA and California. Environ Innov Soc Trans 11:25–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2013.12.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Murphy JT (2015) Human geography and socio-technical transition studies: promising intersections. Environ Innov Soc Trans 17:73–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pestoff V (2014) Collective action and the sustainability of co-production. Public Manage Rev 16(3):383–401.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841460 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Raven R, Schot J, Berkhout F (2012) Space and scale in socio-technical transitions. Environ Innov Soc Trans 4:63–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2012.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Raven R, Kern F, Verhees B, Smith A (2016) Niche construction and empowerment through socio-political work. A meta-analysis of six low-carbon technology cases. Environ Innov Soc Trans 18:164–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.02.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roberts P, Ravetz J, Clive G (2014) Environment and the city. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  43. Rohracher H, Späth P (2014) The interplay of urban energy policy and socio-technical transitions: the eco-cities of Graz and Freiburg in retrospect. Urban Stud 51(7):1415–1431.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013500360 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schepelmann P, Kemp R, Schneidewind U (2016) The eco-restructuring of the Ruhr District as an example of a managed transition. In: Brauch HG, Oswald Spring U, Grin J, Scheffran J (eds) Handbook on sustainability transition and sustainable peace. Springer, Cham,Google Scholar
  45. Schot J, Geels FW (2008) Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technol Anal Strateg Manage 20(5):537–554.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292651 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schot J, Hoogma R, Elzen B (1994) Strategies for shifting technological systems. The case of the automobile system. Futures 26(10):1060–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schulz C, Preller B (2016) Keeping up with the pace of green building: service provision in a highly dynamic sector. In: Jones A, Ström P, Hermelin B, Rusten G (eds) Services and the green economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 269–296.  https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52710-3_12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schwanen T (2017) Thinking complex interconnections: transition, nexus and Geography. Trans Inst Br Geogr.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12223 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shove E, Walker G (2007) CAUTION! Transitions ahead: politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environ Plann A 39(4):763–770.  https://doi.org/10.1068/a39310 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shove E, Walker G (2010) Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Res Policy 39(4):471–476.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith A, Stirling A, Berkhout F (2005) The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Res Policy 34(10):1491–1510.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Späth P, Rohracher H (2015) Conflicting strategies towards sustainable heating at an urban junction of heat infrastructure and building standards. Energy Policy 78:273–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Transition Network (2017) Principles. https://transitionnetwork.org/about-the-movement/what-is-transition/principles-2/. Accessed 21 Dec 2017
  54. Truffer B, Coenen L (2012) Environmental innovation and sustainability transitions in regional studies. Reg Stud 46(1):1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.646164 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Verbong GPJ, Geels FW (2010) Exploring sustainability transitions in the electricity sector with socio-technical pathways. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77(8):1214–1221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.04.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zademach H-M, Dichtl J (2016) greening finance and financing the green: considerations and observations on the role of finance in energy transitions. In: Jones A, Ström P, Hermelin B, Rusten G (eds) Services and the green economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 153–174Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julia Affolderbach
    • 1
  • Christian Schulz
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Geography, School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of HullHullUK
  2. 2.Institute of Geography and Spatial PlanningUniversity of LuxembourgEsch-sur-AlzetteLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations