Leading the Green Transition?

  • Julia Affolderbach
  • Christian Schulz
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

Urban green building transitions are driven by experiments and innovations raising questions of drivers and barriers behind these processes. This chapter discusses spatial and temporal perspectives on green building innovations drawing on research on policy mobilities and innovation. It discusses green building in Freiburg, Vancouver, Brisbane and Luxembourg as places of transition where innovations and change are shaped by internal (local) and external (extra-local) factors. Further, it highlights how the nature and objectives of green building have changed over time based on experiments with green neighbourhoods and flagship buildings and describes how green building is increasingly used for competitive positioning, green marketing and city branding. Finally, the chapter discusses the mobility of green building innovations for the four case study regions differentiating between Freiburg and Vancouver that are predominantly characterised by local policies, models and knowledge and Brisbane and Luxembourg that largely draw on external green building innovations. Together, the chapter highlights the value of spatially sensitive analysis of green building transitions.

Keywords

Places of transition Green leadership Relational places Mobility of ideas and concepts 

References

  1. Acuto M (2012) Ain’t about politics? The wicked power-geometry of Sydney’s greening governance. Int J Urban Reg Res 36(2):381–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Affolderbach J (2008) ENGOs and environmental bargains: a comparative analysis of forest conflicts in Tasmania and British Columbia. Simon Fraser University, BurnabyGoogle Scholar
  3. Affolderbach J (2011) Environmental bargains: power struggles and decision making over British Columbia’s and Tasmania’s old-growth forests. Econ Geogr 87(2):181–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Affolderbach J, Schulz C (2017) Positioning Vancouver through urban sustainability strategies? The Greenest City 2020 Action Plan - ScienceDirect. J Clean Prod 164(15):676–685.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.234 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amin A, Cohendet P (2004) Architectures of knowledge: firms, capabilities and communities. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amin A, Thrift N (1995) Globalisation, institutional thickness and the local economy. In: Managing cities: The new urban context, vol 12. Wiley, CHichester, pp 91–108Google Scholar
  7. Anderberg S, Clark E (2013) Green sustainable Öresund region - or eco-branding Copenhagen and Malmö? In: Vojnovic I (ed) Sustainability: a global urban context. Michigan State University Press, Michigan, pp 591–610Google Scholar
  8. Andersson I (2016) ‘Green cities’ going greener? Local environmental policy-making and place branding in the ‘Greenest City in Europe’. Eur Plann Stud 24(6):1197–1215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P (2016) Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Prog Hum Geogr 28:31–56.  https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph469oa CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Béal V (2011) Urban governance, sustainability and environmental movements: post-democracy in French and British cities. Eur Urban Reg Stud 19(4):404–419.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776411428562 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Becattini G (1991) The industrial district as a creative milieu. In: Industrial change and regional development. Belhaven Press,. London, pp 102–116Google Scholar
  12. Boschma R (2005) Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Reg Stud 39(1):61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boschma R, Iammarino S, Steinmueller E (2013) Geography, skills and technological change. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  14. Camagni R, Capello R (2002) Milieux innovateurs and collective learning: from concepts to measurement. In: Acs ZJ, de Groot HLF, Nijkamp P (eds) The emergence of the knowledge economy. A regional perspective. Springer, Berlin, pp 15–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cidell J (2015) Performing leadership: municipal green building policies and the city as role model. Environ Plann C Gov Policy 33(3):566–579.  https://doi.org/10.1068/c12181 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Devine-Wright P (2013) Explaining “NIMBY” objections to a power line: the role of personal, place attachment and project-related factors. Environ Behav 45(6):761–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dooling S (2008) Ecological gentrification: re-negotiating justice in the city. Crit Plann 15:40–57Google Scholar
  18. Fastenrath S (2015) “Grünes” Bauen - innovative Ansätze in Freibug im Breisgau. Geographische Rundschau 67(5):16–23Google Scholar
  19. Fastenrath S, Braun B (2016) Sustainability transition pathways in the building sector: energy-efficient building in Freiburg (Germany). Appl Geogr.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.004
  20. Florida R (2005) Cities and the creative class. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  21. Freytag T, Gössling S, Mössner S (2014) Living the Green City: Freiburg’s Solarsiedlung between narratives and practices of sustainable urban development. Local Environ 19(6):644–659.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.868872 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. FWTM (2014) Freiburg Green City. Management und Marketing für die Stadt Freiburg, FreiburgGoogle Scholar
  23. Gibbs D, O’Neill K (2015) Building a green economy? Sustainability transitions in the UK building sector. Geoforum 59:133–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. González S (2011) Bilbao and Barcelona ‘in Motion’. How urban regeneration ‘models’ travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism. Urban Stud 48(7):1397–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holden M, Larsen MT (2015) Institutionalizing a policy by any other name: in the City of Vancouver’s Greenest City Action Plan, does climate change policy or sustainability policy smell as sweet? Urban Res Pract 8(3):354–370.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2015.1051382 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hopwood B, Mellor M, O’Brien G (2005) Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustain Dev 13(1):38–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lees L (1999) The Pacific Northwest: rural backwater to urban ecotopia. In: Boal FW, Royle SA (eds) North America: a geographical mosaic. Edward Arnold, London, pp 239–248Google Scholar
  28. Lombardi DR, Porter L, Barber A, Rogers CDF (2011) Conceptualising sustainability in UK urban regeneration: a discursive formation. Urban Stud 48(2):273–296.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009360690 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Long J (2016) Constructing the narrative of the sustainability fix: Sustainability, social justice and representation in Austin, TX. Urban Stud 53(1):149–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Longhurst N (2013) The emergence of an alternative milieu: conceptualising the nature of alternative places. Environ Plann A 45(9):2100–2119.  https://doi.org/10.1068/a45487 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marston SA (2003) Mobilizing geography: locating space in social movement theory. Mobilization 8(2):227–231Google Scholar
  32. McCann E (2011) Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: toward a research agenda. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 101(1):107–130.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2010.520219 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McCann E (2013) Policy boosterism, policy mobilities, and the extrospective city. Urban Geogr 34(1):5–29.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2013.778627 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McCann E, Ward K (2011) Mobile urbanism: cities and policymaking in the global age, vol 17. University of Minnesota Press, MinneapolisGoogle Scholar
  35. Morgan K (2004) The exaggerated death of geography: learning, proximity and territorial innovation systems. J Econ Geogr 4(1):3–21.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/4.1.3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mössner S (2015) Sustainable urban development as consensual practice: post-politics in Freiburg, Germany. Reg Stud:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2015.1102875
  37. Peck J, Theodore N (2010) Mobilizing policy: models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum 41(2):169–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pickerill J (2015) Cold comfort? Reconceiving the practices of bathing in British Self-Build Eco-Homes. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 105(5):1061–1077.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2015.1060880 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Waas T, Hugé J, Verbruggen A, Wright T (2011) Sustainable development: a bird’s eye view. Sustainability 3(10):1637–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Westerhoff L (2015) City stories: from narrative to practice in Vancouver’s Olympic Village. Doctoral dissertation, The University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  41. While A, Jonas AEG, Gibbs D (2004) The environment and the entrepreneurial city: searching for the urban ‘sustainability fix’ in Manchester and Leeds. Int J Urban Reg Res 28(3):549–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julia Affolderbach
    • 1
  • Christian Schulz
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Geography, School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of HullHullUK
  2. 2.Institute of Geography and Spatial Planning, University of LuxembourgEsch-sur-AlzetteLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations