Skip to main content

The Planning Process Integration Influence on the Efficiency of Material Flow in Production Companies

  • Conference paper
Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies (WorldCIST'18 2018)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 745))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 8514 Accesses

Abstract

In the article, the authors present the results of the research on the planning process integration influence on the efficiency of material flow in production companies. In order to identify the influence the authors developed their own planning process integration model based on the Sales and Operations Planning (SOP) approach. Four planning process integration levels were qualitatively defined at the tactical level and were modelled in the simulation environment. The levels were applied to plan material flow in a production company. The flow efficiency was measured by means of the following indicators: customer service level and return on sales. The simulation study results made it possible to confirm that the planning process integration has a positive influence on material flow in production companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adamczak, M., Domański, R., Cyplik, P.: Use of sales and operations planning in small and medium-sized enterprises. LogForum 9, 11–19 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adamczak, M., Hadaś, L., Domański, R., Cyplik, P.: Modelling integration process planning in the supply chain using SOP approach. In: Golińska, P. (ed.) Logistics Operations, Supply Chain Management and Sustainability, pp. 157–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adamczak, M., Cyplik, P.: Influence of task environment on efficiency of material flow in companies with different level of integration of planning processes. In: 17th International Scientific Conference Business Logistics in Modern Management, October 12–13, Osijek, Croatia (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Affonso, R., Marcotte, F., Grabot, B.: Sales and operations planning: the supply chain pillar. Prod. Plan. Control 19(2), 132–141 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blackstone Jr., J.H. (ed.): APICS Dictionary, 13th edn. APICS The Association for Operations Management, Chicago (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cyplik, P., Hadas, L., Adamczak, M., Domański, R., Kupczyk, M., Pruska, Ż.: Measuring the level of integration in a sustainable supply chain. IFAC Proc. 47(3), 4465–4470 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Danese, P., Romano, P., Formentini, M.: the impact of supply chain integration on responsiveness: the moderating effect of using an international supplier network. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 49(1), 125–140 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Daviaud, S.: Why is S&OP still an issue and will on-demand bring to the process? Supply Chain Forum: Int. J. 7(2), 32–45 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farrell, M.J.: The measurement of productive efficiency. J. R. Stat. Soc. 120, 253–281 (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Feng, Y., D’Amours, S., Beauregard, R.: The value of sales and operations planning in oriented strand board industry with make-to-order manufacturing system: cross functional integration under deterministic demand and spot market recourse. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 115(1), 189–209 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hadaya, P., Cassivi, L.: The role of joint collaboration planning actions in a demand-driven supply chain. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 107(7), 954–978 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hadas, L., Cyplik, P., Adamczak, M.: Dimensions for developing supply chain integration scenarios. Bus. Logist. Mod. Manag. 2015, 225–239 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hahn, G.J., Kuhn, H.: Optimising a value-based performance indicator in mid-term sales and operations planning. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 62(3), 515–525 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kolinski, A., Sliwczynski, B.: Evaluation problem and assessment method of warehouse process efficiency. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Scientific Conference, Business Logistics in Modern Management, Osijek, Croatia, pp. 175–188 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mazel, J.: New Research Tells How To Put Muscle Into S&OP S&OP Process. Inventory Management Report, November, pp. 6–10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Muzumdar, M., Fontanella, J.: The secrets to S&OP success. Supply Chain Manag. Rev. 10(3), 4–12 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Olhager, J., Johansson, P.: Linking long-term capacity management for manufacturing and service operations. J. Eng. Technol. Manag. 29(1), 22–33 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Oliva, R., Watson, N.: Cross-functional alignment in supply chain planning: a case study of sales and operations planning. J. Oper. Manag. 29(5), 434–448 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pagell, M.: Understanding the factors that enable and inhibit the integration of operations, purchasing and logistics. J. Oper. Manag. 22(5), 459–487 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Romano, P.: Co-ordination and integration mechanisms to manage logistics processes across supply networks. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 9(3), 119–134 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Seo, Y.-J., Dinwoodie, J., Kwak, D.-W.: The impact of innovativeness on supply chain performance: is supply chain integration a missing link? Supply Chain Manag.: Int. J. 19(5/6), 733–746 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sodhi, M.S., Tang, C.S.: Determining supply requirement in the sales-and-operations-planning (S&OP) process under demand uncertainty: a stochastic programming formulation and a spreadsheet implementation. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 62(3), 526–536 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tuomikangas, N., Kaipia, R.: A.: coordination framework for sales and operations planning (S&OP): synthesis from the literature. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 154, 243–262 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper has been financed within the grant by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education entitled, “Integration of planning processes in supply chain” (project No. KSL 1/17) pursued at the Poznan School of Logistics in Poznań.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michal Adamczak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Cite this paper

Adamczak, M., Cyplik, P. (2018). The Planning Process Integration Influence on the Efficiency of Material Flow in Production Companies. In: Rocha, Á., Adeli, H., Reis, L.P., Costanzo, S. (eds) Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies. WorldCIST'18 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 745. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77703-0_107

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77703-0_107

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77702-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77703-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics