Leadership, Autonomy and Innovation on a High-Tech Organization

  • Ana VelosoEmail author
  • Ana Rita SilvaEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 747)


The purpose of the case study we are presenting was to explore the relationship between transformational leadership and innovative behaviour and the mediating or moderating role of team-level autonomy in the context of high-tech organizations oriented for innovation. A case study was developed in a High-Tech organization, from the north of Portugal. The study research design involved quantitative and qualitative methods. However, for the purpose of this paper, partial results of the quantitative study are being presented. From 143 employees who fulfil the conditions needed to participate in the study (members of a team and didn’t have any leadership position), seventy-six answered, which points out for a response tax of 53%. A questionnaire that included three scales was applied: Global Transformational Leadership (GTL); Team-Level Autonomy (TLA) and Innovative Behaviour (IB). It was found a positive relation between transformational leadership and innovative behaviour and another positive relation between transformational leadership and team level autonomy. Surprising, no relation was found between team level autonomy and innovative behaviour. As discussed, this result may be related to the need of maturing relations and work processes, as this firm is young (8 years since its inception).


Creativity Innovation Leadership Team High-tech organizations 


  1. 1.
    Jassawalla, A.R., Sashittal, H.C.: An examination of collaboration in high-technology new product development processes. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 15(3), 237–254 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rodrigues, F.C., Veloso, A.: A relevância da Gestão de Recursos Humanos para a inovação organizacional, Special number “Inovação, Criatividade e Empreendedorismo” of Revista Psicologia: Organizações e Trabalho 13(3), 41–56 (2013). ISSN 1984-6657Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jiménez-Jiménez, D., Sanz-Valle, R.: Could HRM support organizational innovation? Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manage. 19(7), 1208–1221 (2008). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferreira, J.C., Neves, J., Caetano, A.: Manual de Psicossociologia das Organizações. McGraw-Hill, Lisboa (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bedani, M.: O Impacto dos Valores Organizacionais na Percepção de Estímulos e Barreiras à Criatividade no Ambiente de Trabalho. Revista Administrativa Mackenzie 13(3), 150–176 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carless, S., Wearing, A., Mann, L.A.: Short Measure of Transformational Leadership. J. Bus. Psychol. 14(3), 389–405 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Leede, J., Looise, J.K.: Innovation and HRM: Towards an Integrated Framework. Creat. Innov. Manage. 14, 108–118 (2005). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Veloso, A., Keating, J.: Gestão de recursos humanos em pme’s de elevada tecnologia. Psicologia 22(1), 35–58 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., Herron, M.: Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity. Acad. Manag. J. 39(5), 1154–1184 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eisenbeiß, S.A., Boerner, S.: Transformational Leadership and R&D Innovation: Taking a Curvilinear Approach. Creat. Innov. Manage. 19(4), 364–372 (2010). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scott, S., Bruce, R.: Determinants of Innovation Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Workplace. Acad. Manag. J. 37(3), 580–607 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beveren, P.V.: Liderança Transformacional e Autonomia Grupal: Adaptação de Instrumentos de Medida (Dissertação de Mestrado) (2015). Retrieved from:
  13. 13.
    Langfred, C.W.: Autonomy and Performance in Teams: The Multilevel Moderating Effect of Task Interdependence. J. Manag. 31(4), 513–529 (2005). Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gomes, J.F.S., Veloso, A., Roque, H., Ferreira, A.T.: Adaptação e validação de um Questionário de Comportamento Inovador, working paper (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., Zhou, J.: Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. J. Manage. 40(5), 1297–1333 (2014). Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Piccolo, R.F., Colquitt, J.A.: Transformational leadership and job behaviours: the mediating role of core job characteristics. Acad. Manage. J. 49(2), 327–340 (2006). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Amabile, T.M.: A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. 10(1), 123–167 (1988)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gratton, L., Hope-Hailey, V., Stiles, P., Truss, C.: Linking individual performance to business strategy: the people process model. Hum. Resour. Manage. 38(1), 17–31 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baron, R., Kenny, D.: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 51, 1173–1182 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations