Bipolar Laddering Assessments Applied to Urban Acoustics Education

  • Josep Llorca
  • Héctor Zapata
  • Ernesto Redondo
  • Jesús Alba
  • David Fonseca
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 747)

Abstract

The role of acoustics in architectural planning processes is often neglected if the designer lacks necessary experience in acoustics. Moreover, few experiments till the date have brought audio design tools to the classrooms. A basic BLA (Bipolar Laddering Assessment) experiment is presented with architectural degree students showing that sound aspects of urban design are as important as visual ones. Additionally, this experiment indicates the basic guidelines for the improvement of a urban acoustic education tool which pretends to broaden architecture students insight into urban acoustic problems.

Keywords

Urban acoustics Architectural education BLA Virtual reality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the National Program of Research, Development and Innovation aimed to the Society Challenges with the references BIA2016-77464-C2-1-R & BIA2016-77464-C2-2-R, both of the National Plan for Scientific Research, Development and Technological Innovation 2013–2016, Government of Spain, titled “Gamificación para la enseñanza del diseño urbano y la integración en ella de la participación ciudadana (ArchGAME4CITY)”, & “Diseño Gamificado de visualización 3D con sistemas de realidad virtual para el estudio de la mejora de competencias motivacionales, sociales y espaciales del usuario (EduGAME4CITY)”. (AEI/FEDER, UE).

References

  1. 1.
    Shen, C.-X., Liu, R.-D., Wang, D.: Why are children attracted to the Internet? The role of need satisfaction perceived online and perceived in daily real life. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, 185–192 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pelzer, S., Aspöck, L., Schröder, D., Vorländer, M.: Integrating real-time room acoustics simulation into a CAD modeling software to enhance the architectural design process. Buildings 4, 113–138 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fonseca, D., Redondo, E., Villagrasa, S.: Mixed-methods research: a new approach to evaluating the motivation and satisfaction of university students using advanced visual technologies. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 14, 311–332 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Weinzierl, S., Vorländer, M., Zotter, F., Maempel, H.-J., Lindau, A.: A real-time auralization plugin for architectural design and education. In: Proceedings of the EAA Joint Symposium on Auralization and Ambisonics 2014. Universitätsbibliothek Technische Universität Berlin (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kowaltowski, D.C.C.K., Bianchi, G., de Paiva, V.T.: Methods that may stimulate creativity and their use in architectural design education. Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ. 20, 453–476 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stromquist, N.P.: The impact of information and communication technologies on university students: a tentative assessment. Cult. y Educ. 21, 215–226 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tondeur, J., De Bruyne, E., Van Den Driessche, M., McKenney, S., Zandvliet, D.: The physical placement of classroom technology and its influences on educational practices. Cambridge J. Educ. 45, 537–556 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mercier, E.M., Higgins, S.E., Joyce-Gibbons, A.: The effects of room design on computer-supported collaborative learning in a multi-touch classroom. Interact. Learn. Environ. 24, 504–522 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sipilä, K.: Educational use of information and communications technology: teachers’ perspective. Technol. Pedagogy Educ. 23, 225–241 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rawlins, P., Kehrwald, B.: Integrating educational technologies into teacher education: a case study. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 51, 207–217 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mumtaz, S.: Factors affecting teachers’ use of information and communications technology: a review of the literature. J. Inf. Technol. Teach. Educ. 9, 319–342 (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hodis, F.A., Hancock, G.R.: Introduction to the special issue: advances in quantitative methods to further research in education and educational psychology (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1208750
  13. 13.
    Grimm, K.J., Mazza, G.L., Mazzocco, M.M.M.: Advances in methods for assessing longitudinal change. Educ. Psychol. 51, 342–353 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Truax, B.: Handbook for Acoustic Ecology CD-ROM Edition Version 1.1 (CD) at Discogs. Cambridge Street Publishing, Burnaby (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brown, A.L.: Soundscapes and environmental noise management. Noise Control Eng. J. 58, 493 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cerwén, G.: Urban soundscapes: a quasi-experiment in landscape architecture. Landsc. Res. 41, 481–494 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yang, W., Kang, J.: Soundscape and sound preferences in urban squares: a case study in Sheffield. J. Urban Des. 10, 61–80 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fonseca, D., Navarro, I., de Renteria, I., Moreira, F., Ferrer, Á., de Reina, O.: Assessment of wearable virtual reality technology for visiting world heritage buildings: an educational approach. J. Educ. Comput. Res. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117733995
  19. 19.
    Simpson, P.: Street performance and the city. Space Cult. 14, 415–430 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McNamara, L., Quilter, J.: Street music and the law in Australia: busker perspectives on the impact of local council rules and regulations. J. Musicol. Res. 35, 113–127 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Los músicos callejeros de Barcelona denuncian el acoso que sufren por el ayuntamiento (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gehl, J.: Cities for People. Island Press, London (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gehl, J.: Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space. Island Press, London (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pifarré, M., Tomico, O.: Bipolar laddering (BLA): a participatory subjective exploration method on user experience. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing for User eXperiences - DUX 2007, p. 2. ACM Press, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Walliman, N.: Research Methods, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis, New York (2017)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pfeil, U., Zaphiris, P.: Applying qualitative content analysis to study online support communities. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 9, 1–16 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wiley, J., Griffin, T.D., Jaeger, A.J., Jarosz, A.F., Cushen, P.J., Thiede, K.W.: Improving metacomprehension accuracy in an undergraduate course context. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 22, 393–405 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee, M., Kim, H., Kim, M.: The effects of Socratic questioning on critical thinking in web-based collaborative learning. Educ. as Change 18, 285–302 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AR&M, Barcelona School of Architecture, Barcelona TechCatalonia Polithecnic UniversityBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Applied Physics Department, Physics Technologies CentreValencia Polithecnic UniversityGrao de GandiaSpain
  3. 3.GRETEL – Grup de Recerca en Technology Enhanced LearningLa Salle – Ramon Llull UniversityBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations