Production Scheduling with Quantitative and Qualitative Selection of Human Resources

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 747)

Abstract

The paper presents a method of quantitative and qualitative selection of human resources in production planning based on assumed load of the production system. Human resources are treated as additional resources. Determining the required number of staff and their competences is implemented in three stages. First, the production schedule is determined with the assumption of unlimited availability of additional resources. The obtained solution is a point of reference for determining the minimum number of required resources and their competencies. In the second stage, the reference number of workers is sought. Depending on the way selected, in the last stage the process of merging or removing the competencies of individual workers is done for the optimisation of the number of workers and their individual competencies.

Keywords

Scheduling Additional resources Staff planning Human resources 

References

  1. 1.
    Nicholas, J.M., Steyn, H.: Project Management for Business Engineering and Technology. Taylor & Francis, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blazewicz, J., Ecker, K.H., Pesch, E., Schmidt, G., Weglarz, J.: Scheduling Computer and Manufacturing Processes. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pinedo, M.L.: Scheduling. Theory, Algorithms and Systems. Springer, New York (2012)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kalinowski, K., Grabowik, C., Paprocka, I., Kempa, W.: Production scheduling with discrete and renewable additional resources. Materials Sci. Eng. 95, 1–6 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Starzyńska, B., Hamrol, A.: Excellence toolbox: decision support system for quality tools and techniques selection and application. Total Qual. Manage. Bus. Excellence 24(5–6), 577–595 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blazewicz, J., Lenstra, J.K., RinnooyKan, A.H.G.: Scheduling subject to resource constraints: classification and complexity. Discrete Appl. Math. 5(1), 11–24 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fanjul-Peyro, L., Perea, F., Ruiz, R.: Models and matheuristics for the unrelated parallel machine scheduling problem with additional resources. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 260, 482–493 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Edi, E.B., Oguz, C., Ozkarahan, I.: Parallel machine scheduling with additional resources: notation, classification, models and solution methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 230, 449–463 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baron-Puda, M., Mleczko, J.: Simulation of human resources allocation in scheduling processes. Appl. Comput. Sci. 4(2), 1–16 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Starzynska, B., Szajkowska, K., Diering, M., Rocha, A., Reis, L.P.: A study of raters agreement in quality inspection with the participation of hearing disabled employees. In: Advances in Manufacturing. LNME, pp. 881–888. Springer, Cham (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Donyina, A., Heckel, R.: Modelling flexible human resource allocation by stochastic graph transformation. Electron. Commun. EASST 38, 1–17 (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dean, B.V., Denzler, D.R., Watkins, J.J.: Multiproject staff scheduling with variable resource constraints. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 39(1), 59–72 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blochliger, I.: Modeling staff scheduling problems. A tutorial. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 158, 533–542 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Armstrong, M.: A Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice, 11th edn. Kogan Page, London (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van den Bergh, J., Jeroen Beliën, J., De Bruecker, P., Demeulemeester, E., De Boeck, L.: Personnel scheduling: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 226, 367–385 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reddy, M.S., Ratnam, C., Agrawal, R., Varela, M.L.R., Sharma, I., Manupati, V.K.: Investigation of reconfiguration effect on makespan with social network method for flexible job shop scheduling problem. Comput. Ind. Eng. 110, 231–241 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Trojanowska, J., Dostatni, E.: Application of the theory of constraints for project management. Manage. Prod. Eng. Rev. 8(3), 87–95 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Engineering Processes Automation and Integrated Manufacturing SystemsSilesian University of TechnologyGliwicePoland

Personalised recommendations