Abstract
In this chapter, I outline the research design and empirical methods applied for the work being presented here. The research design refers to how the research topic was empirically approached, whereas the methods are the procedures used for collecting and analysing my empirical data (Creswell and Plano Clark 2011, p. 53). The core research question that needs to be addressed is the following: How can we assess—in a systematic and holistic sense—the influence of energy cooperatives on Germany’s energy transition?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The actor network analysis was done in mid-2015, so all renewable energy production cooperatives registered through December 2015 could not yet be included. Hence, I decided to focus on all cooperatives registered until the end of 2014. Results from 2014 seem to be sufficient, since only 42 additional organisations were registered in 2015.
References
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor books (Vol. 589). Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Debor, S. (2014). The socio-economic power of renewable energy production cooperatives in Germany. Results of an empirical assessment. Wuppertal Papers No. 178. Wuppertal.
Flick, U. (2011). Triangulation: Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden.
Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study, Nr. 8/9. Research Policy, pp. 1257–1274.
Geels, F., & Deuten, J. J. (2006). Local and global dynamics in technological development: A socio-cognitive perspective on knowledge flows and lessons from reinforced concrete. Science and Public Policy, 33(4), 265–275.
Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research: Principles and practices. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Herriott, R. E., & Firestone, W. A. (1983). Multisite qualitative policy research: Optimizing description and generalizability. Educational Researcher, 12(2), 14–19.
Holstenkamp, L., & Müller, J. R. (2013). Zum Stand von Energiegenossenschaften in Deutschland – Eine Typologie, Paper Präsentation auf der AGI-Nachwuchswissenschaftler-Tagung 2013. Münster.
Jackson, M. O. (2011). Social and economic networks. Princeton, NJ, Woodstock: Princeton University Press.
Knoke, D., & Yang, S. (2008). Social network analysis. Quantitative applications in the social sciences (Vol. 154). Los Angeles: Sage.
Kruse, J. (2008). Reader “Einführung in die Qualitative Interviewforschung”. Freiburg.
Kühl, S., Strodtholz, P., & Taffertshofer, A. (2009). Qualitative und quantitative Methoden der Organisationsforschung – ein Überblick. In S. Kühl, P. Strodtholz, & A. Taffertshofer (Eds.), Handbuch Methoden der Organisationsforschung. Quantitative und qualitative Methoden (pp. 13–31). Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Maron, B., & Maron, H. (2012). Genossenschaftliche Unterstützungsstrukturen für eine sozialräumlich orientierte Energiewirtschaft. Machbarkeitsstudie. Köln. Retrieved 01.10.2016, from http://www.kni.de/media/pdf/Machbarkeitsstudie_Unterstuetzungsstrukturen_Geno.pdf
Mayntz, R. (2009). Sozialwissenschaftliches Erklären: Probleme der Theoriebildung und Methodologie. Schriften aus dem Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung (Vol. 63). Frankfurt/Main: Campus.
Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken, Beltz Pädagogik (11th ed.). Weinheim: Beltz.
Moss, T. (2009). Intermediaries and the governance of sociotechnical networks in transition. Environment and Planning A, 41(6), 1480–1495.
Orum, A. M., Feagin, J. R., & Sjoberg, G. (1991). The nature of the case study. In J. R. Feagin, A. M. Orum, & G. Sjoberg (Eds.), A case for the case study (pp. 1–26). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Scott, J. (2013). Social network analysis (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, DC: Sage.
Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stake, R. E. (2005). Multicase research methods: Step by step cross-case analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Structural analysis in the social sciences (Vol. 8). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods, Applied social research methods series (Vol. 5, 4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Debor, S. (2018). Research Design and Methods. In: Multiplying Mighty Davids?. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77628-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77628-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77627-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77628-6
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)