Abstract
This book poses and answers the question: What do emotions do for us? This question is centuries old, but only recently has behavioral and neurological study of emotion progressed to the point that we can start to answer. Scientific study of emotions has been a relatively recent development, in part because of the sentiment conveyed in the quote above from Camus. Emotions feel so deeply personal, and so related to our values and hopes, that it is almost impossible to convey their meaning to others in ways that can be understood. As soon as we apply a label to the emotion, it seems to lessen the experience itself. Yet the strength of the scientific study of emotion rests in the ability of researchers to approach the topic with methodological rigor – they must define what emotions are, what causes them, and how to elicit and measure them. Applying the scientific method to the study of emotion has allowed researchers who study human behavior to examine the consequences of emotions for people. The findings help us to understand emotions in daily life and in mental health disorders, as well as how to think about emotion to improve our lives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arnold, M. B. (1960). Emotion and personality. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Averill, J. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression: Implications for theories of emotion. American Psychologist, 38, 1145–1160.
Camus, A. (1991). The plague. New York, NY: Vintage Books. (Original work published 1947).
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34–43.
Eich, E., Kihlstrom, J. F., Bower, G. H., Forgas, J. P., & Niedenthal, P. M. (Eds.). (2000). Cognition and emotion. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Ekman, P. (1992). Are there basic emotions? Psychological Review, 99, 550–553.
Erber, R., & Erber, M. W. (2000). The self-regulation of moods: Second thoughts on the importance of happiness in everyday life. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 142–148.
Frijda, N. H. (1987). Emotion, cognitive structure, and action tendency. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 115–143.
Hofmann, W., Friese, M., & Strack, F. (2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 162–176.
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720.
Kaplan, R. L., Levine, L. J., Lench, H. C., & Safer, M. A. (2016). Forgetting feelings: Opposite biases in reports of the intensity of past emotion and mood. Emotion, 16, 309–319.
Lau, H. P. B., White, M. P., & Schnall, S. (2013). Quantifying the value of emotions using a willingness to pay approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1543–1561.
Lench, H. C., Bench, S. W., Darbor, K. E., & Moore, M. (2015). A functionalist manifesto: Goal-related emotions from an evolutionary perspective. Emotion Review, 7, 90–98.
Lench, H. C., Bench, S. W., & Perez, K. A. (2017). Building a house of sentiment on sand: Epistemologial issues with contempt. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 33–34.
Lench, H. C., Safer, M. A., & Levine, L. J. (2011). Focalism and the underestimation of future emotion: When it’s worse than imagined. Emotion, 11, 278–285.
Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 146–159.
Levine, L. J., Lench, H. C., Kaplan, R. L., & Safer, M. A. (2012). Accuracy and artifact: Reexamining the intensity bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 584–605.
Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272–292.
Mauss, I. B., Levenson, R. W., McCarter, L., Wilhelm, F. H., & Gross, J. J. (2005). The tie that binds? Coherence among emotion experience, behavior, and physiology. Emotion, 5, 175–190.
Oatley, K. (2004). Emotions: A brief history. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York, NY: Norton.
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172.
Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 67–85.
Tiedens, L. Z. (2001). Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: The effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 86–94.
Verduyn, P., Van Mechelen, I., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2011). The relation between event processing and the duration of emotional experience. Emotion, 11, 20–28.
Weisberg, R. W. (2004). On structure in the creative process: A quantitative case-study of the creation of Picasso’s Guernica. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 23–54.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lench, H.C., Carpenter, Z.K. (2018). What Do Emotions Do for Us?. In: Lench, H. (eds) The Function of Emotions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77619-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77619-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77618-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77619-4
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)