• Madeleine Martinek


[In progressive societies] social necessities and social opinion are always more or less in advance of Law. We may come indefinitely near to the closing of the gap between them, but it has a perpetual tendency to reopen.


  1. Basedow J, Kono T (eds) (2016) Special Economic Zones. Mohr Siebeck, TübingenGoogle Scholar
  2. Bell DA (2015) The China model: political meritocracy and the limits of democracy. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beutel FK (1957) Some potentialities of experimental jurisprudence as a new branch of social science. University of Nebraska Press, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  4. Bi Y (2015) Experimentalist approach of Chinese legislation model: from passive response to institutional design. The Theory and Practice of Legislation 3(2):141–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bu Y (2016) Rechtsdogmatik: vom Transfer des deutschen Rechts zum Transfer des deutschen Konzepts der Rechtswissenschaft. JZ:382–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter C, Harding A (2011) SEZs: policy incubators or catalysts for development? In: Carter C, Harding A (eds) Special Economic Zones in Asian market economies. Routledge, London, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  7. Cavers DF (1957) Science, research and the law: Beutel’s “experimental jurisprudence”. J. Legal Educ. 10(2):162–188Google Scholar
  8. Corcodel V (2014) The governance implications of comparative legal thinking: on Henry Maine’s and liberal imperialism. In: Watt HM, Fernández Arroyo DP (eds) Private international law and global governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 92–118Google Scholar
  9. De Sloovere FJ (1936) Contextual interpretation of statutes. Fordham Law Review 5(2):219–239Google Scholar
  10. Farh J-L, Cheng B-S (2000) A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In: Li J, Tsui AS, Weldon E (eds) Management and organizations in the Chinese context. Macmillan Press Ltd., London, pp 84–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feng Y (2017) Examining legislation in China’s Special Economic Zones: framework, practice and prospects. HKLJ 47:585–614Google Scholar
  12. Fenwick A (1984) Evaluating China’s Special Economic Zones. Int’l Tax & Bus. Law. 2(2):376–397Google Scholar
  13. Florini AM, Lai H, Tan Y (2012) China experiments: from local innovations to national reform. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  14. Graveson RH (1941) The movement from status to contract. M. L. R. 4(4):261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heilmann S (2008a) From local experiments to national policy: the origins of China’s distinctive policy process. The China Journal 59:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heilmann S (2008b) Policy experimentation in China’s economic rise. St Comp Int Dev 43(1):1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heilmann S (2009) Maximum tinkering under uncertainty: unorthodox lessons from China. Modern China 35(4):450–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heldeweg MA (2015) Experimental legislation concerning technological & governance innovation – an analytical approach. The Theory and Practice of Legislation 3(2):169–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoffmann-Riem W (1993) Experimentelle Gesetzgebung. In: Becker B, Bull HP, Seewald O (eds) Festschrift für Werner Thieme zum 70. Geburtstag. Heymann, Köln, pp 55–69Google Scholar
  20. Keller P (1994) Sources of order in Chinese law. Am. J. Comp. L. 42(4):711–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Larenz K (1979) Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft, 4th edn. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liebman BL (2011) A return to populist legality? Historical legacies and legal reform. In: Heilmann S, Perry EJ (eds) Mao’s invisible hand: the political foundations of adaptive governance in China. Harvard University Asia Center, Cambridge, pp 165–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lindner JF (2007) Experimentelle Rechtsetzung durch Rechtsverordnung - Am Beispiel des Hochschulrechts. DÖV (23):1003–1009Google Scholar
  24. Maaß V (2001) Experimentierklauseln für die Verwaltung und ihre verfassungsrechtlichen Grenzen: Zugleich ein Beitrag zu § 7a BerlHG. Duncker & Humblot, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  25. MacFarquhar R (1991) Chapter 4 – the succession to Mao and the end of Maoism. In: MacFarquhar R, Fairbank JK (eds) The Cambridge history of China, Vol. 15 - The People’s Republic, Part 2: revolutions within the Chinese Revolution, 1966–1982. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 303–401Google Scholar
  26. Mader L (1988) Experimentelle Gesetzgebung. In: Grimm D, Maihofer W (eds) Gesetzgebungstheorie und Rechtspolitik. Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen, pp 211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mah JS (2008) Foreign direct investment inflows and economic development: the case of Shenzhen Special Economic Zone in China. JWIT 9(4):319–331Google Scholar
  28. Maine SHS (1887) Ancient law: its connection with the early history of society and its relation to modern ideas, 11th edn. John Murray, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Merriam Webster (2015) Definition of “iteration”. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
  30. Moberg L (2017) The political economy of Special Economic Zones: concentrating economic development. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Nishitateno S (1983) China’s Special Economic Zones: experimental units for economic reform. Int’l & Comp. L. Q. 32(1):175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pow E, Moser MJ (1987) Law and investment in China’s special investment areas. In: Moser MJ (ed) Foreign trade, investment, and the law in the People’s Republic of China, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press China, Hong Kong, pp 199–303Google Scholar
  33. Raisch P (1995) Juristische Methoden: Vom antiken Rom bis zur Gegenwart. C.F. Müller, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  34. Ranchordás S (2013) The whys and woes of experimental legislation. The Theory and Practice of Legislation 1(3):415–440Google Scholar
  35. Ranchordás S (2014) Constitutional sunsets and experimental legislation: a comparative perspective. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ranchordás S (2015) Sunset clauses and experimental regulations: blessing or curse for legal certainty? Statute Law Review 36(1):28–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rodrik D (2009) The new development economics: we shall experiment, but how shall we learn. In: Cohen J, Easterly W (eds) What works in development? Thinking big and thinking small. Brookings Institution Press, Washington DC, pp 24–54Google Scholar
  38. Seppänen S (2014) Ideological renewal and Nostalgia in China’s “Avant-garde” legal scholarship. Washington University Global Studies Law Review 13(1):83–125Google Scholar
  39. Stettner R (1989) Verfassungsbindungen des experimentierenden Gesetzgebers. NVwZ:806–812Google Scholar
  40. Talaga T (2012) Is Shenzhen’s success starting to fade? Accessed 20 Dec 2017
  41. Teets JC, Hurst W (2015) Introduction: the politics and patterns of policy diffusion in China. In: Teets JC, Hurst W (eds) Local governance innovation in China: experimentation, diffusion and defiance. Routledge, London, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  42. The Economist (2017) Shenzhen is a hothouse of innovation. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
  43. Tsai W, Dean N (2014) Experimentation under hierarchy in local conditions: cases of political reform in Guangdong and Sichuan, China. The China Quarterly 218:339–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang S (王绍光) (2008) Learning and adapting: the case of rural healthcare financing in China (学习机制与适应能力: 中国农村合作医疗体制变迁的启示). Social Sciences in China (中国社会科学) (6):111–133Google Scholar
  45. Wang Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Chen Z, Lu M (2009) The costs and benefits of federalism, Chinese style. In: Sweetman A, Zhang J (eds) Economic transitions with Chinese characteristics: thirty years of reform and opening up. Montreal, Kingston, pp 141–159Google Scholar
  46. Yang L (杨龙芳) (2004) The legislative innovation in Shenzhen SEZ: its history, features and prospect (论深圳经济特区: 地方立法创新的历史,特色与前景). Journal of Shenzhen University (深圳大学学报) 21(2):5–9Google Scholar
  47. Yeung Y-M, Lee J, Kee G (2009) China’s Special Economic Zones at 30. Eurasian Geography and Economics 50(2):222–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. You M (由萌) (2016) Discussing the development of China on the basis of “from status to contract” (由“从身份到契约”谈中国发展). Broad History of the Communist Party (党史博采(理论)) (2):36–40Google Scholar
  49. Yuan Y, Guo H, Xu H, Li W, Luo S, Lin H, Yuan Y (2010) China’s First Special Economic Zone: the case of Shenzhen. In: Zeng DZ (ed) Building engines for growth and competitiveness in China: experience with Special Economic Zones and industrial clusters. World Bank Publications, Washington DC, pp 55–86Google Scholar
  50. Zhu J (1994) Changing land policy and its impact on local growth: the experience of Shenzhen Special Economic Zone, China, in the 1980s. Urban Studies 31(10):1611–1623CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Madeleine Martinek
    • 1
  1. 1.BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations