Developing a Social Innovation Methodology in the Web 2.0 Era

  • Thomas Vilarinho
  • Jacqueline Floch
  • Manuel Oliveira
  • Inès Dinant
  • Ilias O. Pappas
  • Simone Mora
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10750)

Abstract

The world is facing a growing number of societal challenges such as inequality rise, political upheaval, ageing population, etc. Governments are struggling to keep up to theirs existing service offers, making it difficult for tackling overarching social challenges alone. The active involvement of citizens in partaking social innovations is seen as potential solution to those wider challenges. However, the majority of the population lacks an understanding of social innovation and on how to contribute. In this work, we present a social innovation methodology catering citizens without previous social innovation experience and accessible via an ICT platform. We describe the designing process of the methodology, the core aspects of the resulting methodology and its validation.

Keywords

Social innovation process Collective awareness platforms 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors of this paper, on behalf of the SOCRATIC consortium, acknowledge the European Union and the Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Framework Programme for funding the project (ref. 688228). Furthermore, we thank the participants to the validation, and the project partners for the collaboration during participant recruitment and discussion of the results.

References

  1. 1.
    Assembl. http://catalyst-fp7.eu/open-tools/assembl/. Accessed 06 Oct 2017
  2. 2.
    Be-novative. https://www.be-novative.com/. Accessed 06 Oct 2017
  3. 3.
    Debate Hub. http://catalyst-fp7.eu/open-tools/debatehub/. Accessed 06 Oct 2017
  4. 4.
    Extreme Factories project site. http://www.extremefactories.eu/. Accessed 06 Oct 2017
  5. 5.
    InnoCentive. https://www.innocentive.com/. Accessed 06 Oct 2017
  6. 6.
    LiteMap. http://catalyst-fp7.eu/open-tools/litemap/. Accessed 06 Oct 2017
  7. 7.
    MakeSense. https://www.makesense.org. Accessed 06 Oct 2017
  8. 8.
    Objective8 github page. https://github.com/d-cent/objective8. Accessed 06 Oct 2017
  9. 9.
    OpenIDEO. https://openideo.com/. Accessed 06 Oct 2017
  10. 10.
    Teem. https://app.teem.works/teems/featured. Accessed 06 Oct 2017
  11. 11.
    TEPSIE: “Doing Social Innovation: A Guide for Practitioners”. A deliverable of the project: “The theoretical, empirical and policy foundations for building social innovation in Europe” (TEPSIE). Technical report, European Commission 7th Framework Programme, European Commission, DG Research, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Botsman, R., Rogers, R.: What’s mine is yours: the rise of collaborative consumption (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Boudreau, K.J., Lakhani, K.R.: Using the crowd as an innovation partner. Harv. Buss. Rev. 91(4), 60–69 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Capati, M.: 10 indispensable open innovation platforms for global corporations. http://crowdsourcingweek.com/blog/10-indispensable-open-innovation-platforms-global-corporations/
  15. 15.
    Dinant, I., Floch, J., Oliveira, M., Vilarinho, T.: Socratic methodology workbook v. 01. Technical report (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dinant, I., Floch, J., Vilarinho, T., Oliveira, M.: Designing a digital social innovation platform: from case studies to concepts. In: Kompatsiaris, I., Cave, J., Satsiou, A., Carle, G., Passani, A., Kontopoulos, E., Diplaris, S., McMillan, D. (eds.) INSCI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10673, pp. 101–118. Springer, Cham (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70284-1_9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Franz, H.W., Hochgerner, J., Howaldt, J.: Challenge Social Innovation: Potentialsfor Business, Social Entrepreneurship, Welfare and Civil Society. Springer Science & Business Media, Heidelberg (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32879-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gabriel, M.: Making it big: strategies for scaling social innovations. Nesta, London (2014). http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/making-it-big-strategies-scaling-social-innovations
  19. 19.
    Harnish, V., Gazelles (firma): Scaling Up: How a Few Companies Make It... and Why the Rest Don’t. Gazelles Incorporated (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Howe, J.: The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired Mag. 14(6), 1–4 (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mollick, E.: The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study. J. Bus. Ventur. 29(1), 1–16 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., Mulgan, G.: The Open Book of Social Innovation. National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Art London (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oates, B.J.: Researching information systems and computing. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Romero, I., Rueda, Y., Fumero, A., Vilarinho, T., Floch, J., Oliveira, M., Dinant, I.: SOCRATIC, the place where social innovation ‘Happens’. In: Bagnoli, F., Satsiou, A., Stavrakakis, I., Nesi, P., Pacini, G., Welp, Y., Tiropanis, T., DiFranzo, D. (eds.) INSCI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9934, pp. 89–96. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45982-0_8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stokes, M., Baeck, P., Baker, T.: What next for digital social innovation? DSI4Europe report. Technical report (2017)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tschimmel, K.: Design thinking as an effective toolkit for innovation. In: ISPIM Conference Proceedings of the International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), p. 1 (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Manag. Inf. Syst. Q. 36(1), 157–178 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SINTEFTrondheimNorway
  2. 2.FarapiSan SebastianSpain
  3. 3.Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations