Skip to main content

Primary Care

  • 941 Accesses

Abstract

Due to improved diagnostic and treatment options, many cancer patients will become long-term cancer survivors. The efficacy and desire to involve primary health care into cancer follow-up care has been discussed for decades. There is overwhelming anecdotal evidence that this is a valuable model that will be cost-effective, reduces the strain on the tertiary health-care system, and has a high degree of satisfaction among patients and clinicians. Thus primary health care is in an excellent position to provide optimal care to the “whole cancer patient” including patients with comorbid conditions. A number of challenges and barriers have been identified that hinder primary health-care involvement with cancer follow-up care. For example, there is a lack of clinical guidelines for primary health-care providers; communication between primary health-care providers and other clinicians remains problematic; and health-care systems vary greatly between countries, regions, and even cities impeding a uniform approach. To date, the evidence for cancer follow-up care models that involve primary health care is scant. Thus the overall theory that primary health care has an important role to play in cancer follow-up care needs to be supported by more solid empirical evidence, so that best practices can be identified and implemented.

Keywords

  • Primary health-care providers
  • Cancer follow-up care
  • Cancer survivors

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-77432-9_18
  • Chapter length: 13 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-77432-9
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 18.1
Fig. 18.2

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Health professionals associated with cancer care. 2017; Available from: https://www.cancer.org/treatment/finding-and-paying-for-treatment/choosing-your-treatment-team/health-professionals-associated-with-cancer-care.html.

  2. Boscoe FP, Henry KA, Sherman RL, Johnson CJ. The relationship between cancer incidence, stage and poverty in the United States. Int J Cancer. 2016;139(3):607–12.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jacobsen AA, Galvan A, Lachapelle CC, Wohl CB, Kirsner RS, Strasswimmer J. Defining the need for skin cancer prevention education in uninsured, minority, and immigrant communities. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(12):1342–7.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahmed Z, Kujtan L, Kennedy KF, Davis JR, Subramanian J. Disparities in the management of patients with stage I small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC): a surveillance, epidemiology and end results (SEER) analysis. Clin Lung Cancer. 2017;18:e315–25.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Fleisch Marcus A, Illescas AH, Hohl BC, Llanos AA. Relationships between social isolation, neighborhood poverty, and cancer mortality in a population-based study of US adults. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173370.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Yabroff KR, Dowling EC, Guy GP Jr, Banegas MP, Davidoff A, Han X, et al. Financial hardship associated with cancer in the United States: findings from a population-based sample of adult cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(3):259–67.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Charlton M, Schlichting J, Chioreso C, Ward M, Vikas P. Challenges of rural cancer care in the United States. Oncology (Williston Park). 2015;29(9):633–40.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Solet DJ, Norvell JM, Rutan GH, Frankel RM. Lost in translation: challenges and opportunities in physician-to-physician communication during patient handoffs. Acad Med. 2005;80(12):1094–9.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wood ML. Communication between cancer specialists and family doctors. Can Fam Physician. 1993;39:49–57.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Cancer Statistics [database on the Internet] 2017. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/understanding/statistics.

  12. Canadian Cancer Society’s Advisory Committee on Cancer Statistics. Special topic: predictions of the future burden of cancer in Canada. Toronto: Canadian Cancer Society; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klabunde CN, Lanier D, Nadel MR, McLeod C, Yuan G, Vernon SW. Colorectal cancer screening by primary care physicians: recommendations and practices, 2006-2007. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(1):8–16.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Easley J, Miedema B, Carroll JC, Manca DP, O’Brien MA, Webster F, et al. Coordination of cancer care between family physicians and cancer specialists: importance of communication. Can Fam Physician. 2016;62(10):e608–e15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Miedema B, Easley J, Robinson L. Do current cancer follow-up care practices meet the needs of young adult cancer survivors in Canada? A qualitative inquiry. Curr Oncol. 2013;20(1):14–22.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. World Health Organization. Declaration of Alma-Ata 1978. Available from: http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/declaration_almaata.pdf.

  17. Rao M, Pilot E. The missing link – the role of primary care in global health. Glob Health Action. 2014;7:23693.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2008 – Primary Health Care (Now More Than Ever). 2008. Available from: http://www.who.int/whr/2008/whr08_en.pdf.

  19. American Association of Nurse Practitioners. NP fact sheet 2017 [cited 2017 February 16]; Available from: https://www.aanp.org/all-about-nps/np-fact-sheet.

  20. Canadian Nurses Association. Nurse Practioners. 2017 [cited 2017 February 16]; Available from: https://cna-aiic.ca/en/professional-development/advanced-nursing-practice/nurse-practitioners.

  21. Dierick-van Daele AT, Spreeuwenberg C, Derckx EW, van Leeuwen Y, Toemen T, Legius M, et al. The value of nurse practitioners in Dutch general practices. Qual Prim Care. 2010;18(4):231–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Starfield B. Primary care and health. A cross-national comparison. JAMA. 1991;266(16):2268–71.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Miedema B. Primary care: a comparison across five nations (part 1-6). CMAJ Blogs: Can Med Assoc J. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  24. van Weel C. Primary care: a comparison across five nations (part 4-6). CMAJ Blogs: Can Med Assoc J. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goodyear-Smith F. Primary care: a comparison across five nations (part 2-6). CMAJ Blogs: Can Med Assoc J. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bates DW. Primary care and the US health care system: what needs to change? J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(10):998–9.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  27. Blumenthal D, Abrams M, Nuzum R. The affordable care act at 5 years. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(16):1580.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  28. Hogg W. Primary care: a comparison across five nations (part 6-6). CMAJ Blogs: Can Med Assoc J. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Canadian Institute for Health Information. How Canada Compares: Results From The Commonwealth Fund 2015 International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  30. The Commonwealth Fund. In: Mossialos E, Wenzl M, Osborn R, Sarnak D, editors. 2015 International Profiles of Health Care Systems. Common Wealth Fund 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brigden M, Lam W, Spadafora S, El-Maraghi R, Whitlock P, Champion P. Update on community oncology practice in Canada: a view from the trenches. Oncol Exch. 2015;14(1):12–6.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sisler JJ, DeCarolis M, Robinson D, Sivananthan G. Family physicians who have focused practices in oncology: results of a national survey. Can Fam Physician. 2013;59(6):e290–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Nelson R. Cancer clinics closing: community oncology “near crisis”. 2017. Available from: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/806981.

  34. Community Oncology Alliance. 2017. Available from: https://www.communityoncology.org/home/about-us/.

  35. Nekhlyudov L, O’Malley DM, Hudson SV. Integrating primary care providers in the care of cancer survivors: gaps in evidence and future opportunities. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(1):e30-e8.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  36. Nekhlyudov L. Integrating primary care in cancer survivorship programs: models of care for a growing patient population. Oncologist. 2014;19(6):579–82.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  37. Grunfeld E, Levine MN, Julian JA, Coyle D, Szechtman B, Mirsky D, et al. Randomized trial of long-term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(6):848–55.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  38. Maly RC, Liu Y, Diamant AL, Thind A. The impact of primary care physicians on follow-up care of underserved breast cancer survivors. J Am Board Fam Med. 2013;26(6):628–36.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  39. Sarfati D, Koczwara B, Jackson C. The impact of comorbidity on cancer and its treatment. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(4):337–50.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  40. Meiklejohn JA, Mimery A, Martin JH, Bailie R, Garvey G, Walpole ET, et al. The role of the GP in follow-up cancer care: a systematic literature review. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(6):990–1011.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  41. Sussman J, Baldwin LM. The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from diagnosis through primary treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(40):18–24.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  42. Weaver KE, Aziz NM, Arora NK, Forsythe LP, Hamilton AS, Oakley-Girvan I, et al. Follow-up care experiences and perceived quality of care among long-term survivors of breast, prostate, colorectal, and gynecologic cancers. J Oncol Pract. 2014;10(4):e231–9.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  43. American Academy of Family Physicians. Continuity of Care (AAFP), 2017. Policies: Definition of Continuity of Care. 1983 (2015 COD), https://www.aafp.org/about/policies/all/definition-care.html. Accessed 20 May 2018.

  44. Kendell C, Decke KM, Groome PA, McBride ML, Jiang L, Krzyzanowska MK, et al. Use of physician services during the survivorship phase: a multi-province study of women diagnosed with breast cancer. Curr Oncol. 2017;24(2):81–9.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Snyder CF, Frick KD, Herbert RJ, Blackford AL, Neville BA, Carducci MA, et al. Preventive care in prostate cancer patients: following diagnosis and for five-year survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2011;5(3):283–91.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  46. Pollack LA, Adamache W, Ryerson AB, Eheman CR, Richardson LC. Care of long-term cancer survivors: physicians seen by Medicare enrollees surviving longer than 5 years. Cancer. 2009;115(22):5284–95.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  47. Jabaaij L, van den Akker M, Schellevis FG. Excess of health care use in general practice and of comorbid chronic conditions in cancer patients compared to controls. BMC Fam Pract. 2012;13:60.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  48. Murray SA, Osman H. Primary palliative care: the potential of primary care physicians as providers of palliative care in the community in the eastern Mediterranean region. East Mediterr Health J. 2012;18(2):178–83.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Gott M, Frey R, Raphael D, O’Callaghan A, Robinson J, Boyd M. Palliative care need and management in the acute hospital setting: a census of one New Zealand Hospital. BMC Palliat Care. 2013;12:15.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  50. U.S. National Library of Medicine, Hospice Care: Also called end of Life Care. https://medlineplus.gov/hospicecare.html. Accessed 20 May 2018.

  51. Burge F, Lawson B, Johnston G, Asada Y, McIntyre PF, Flowerdew G. Preferred and actual location of death: what factors enable a preferred home death? J Palliat Med. 2015;18(12):1054–9.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  52. Arnold E, Finucane AM, Oxenham D. Preferred place of death for patients referred to a specialist palliative care service. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2015;5(3):294–6.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  53. Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association, Fact Sheet: Hospice Palliative Care in Canada 2016. http://www.chpca.net/media/481407/Fact_Sheet_HPC_in_Canada%20Fall%202016%20-%20EN.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2018.

  54. Bekelman JE, Halpern SD, Blankart CR, Bynum JP, Cohen J, Fowler R, et al. Comparison of site of death, health care utilization, and hospital expenditures for patients dying with cancer in 7 developed countries. JAMA. 2016;315(3):272–83.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Aubin M, Vezina L, Verreault R, Fillion L, Hudon E, Lehmann F, et al. Family physician involvement in cancer care follow-up: the experience of a cohort of patients with lung cancer. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(6):526–32.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  56. Selman LE, Brighton LJ, Robinson V, George R, Khan SA, Burman R, et al. Primary care physicians’ educational needs and learning preferences in end of life care: a focus group study in the UK. BMC Palliat Care. 2017;16(1):17.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  57. The Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association, Canadians want palliative and end-of-life care support – but they don’t know how or where to access it 2014. http://www.chpca.net/news-and-events/news-item-45.aspx. Accessed 20 May 2018.

  58. Pidgeon TM, Johnson CE, Lester L, Currow D, Yates P, Allingham SF, et al. Perceptions of the care received from Australian palliative care services: a caregiver perspective. Palliat Support Care. 2018 Apr;16(2):198–208.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  59. Brumley R, Enguidanos S, Jamison P, Seitz R, Morgenstern N, Saito S, et al. Increased satisfaction with care and lower costs: results of a randomized trial of in-home palliative care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55(7):993–1000.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  60. Emanuel EJ, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Urwin JW, Cohen J. Attitudes and practices of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the United States, Canada, and Europe. JAMA. 2016;316(1):79–90.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Snijdewind MC, Willems DL, Deliens L, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD, Chambaere K. A study of the first year of the end-of-life clinic for physician-assisted dying in the Netherlands. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(10):1633–40.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  62. Dying for Choice. Netherlands – 2015 euthanasia report card. Available from: http://www.dyingforchoice.com/resources/fact-files/netherlands-2015-euthanasia-report-card.

  63. Government of Canada. Interim update on medical assistance in dying in Canada, June 17 to December 31, 2016. Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/publications/health-system-services/medical-assistance-dying-interim-report-dec-2016.html.

  64. Hudson SV, Miller SM, Hemler J, Ferrante JM, Lyle J, Oeffinger KC, et al. Adult cancer survivors discuss follow-up in primary care: ‘not what I want, but maybe what I need’. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(5):418–27.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  65. Brandenbarg D, Roorda C, Stadlander M, de Bock GH, Berger MY, Berendsen AJ. Patients’ views on general practitioners’ role during treatment and follow-up of colorectal cancer: a qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2016;34:234–8.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  66. Lang V, Walter S, Fessler J, Koester MJ, Ruetters D, Huebner J. The role of the general practitioner in cancer care: a survey of the patients’ perspective. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017;143:895–904.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Miedema B. Survivorship research in Canada. Boston: Cancer and Primary Care Research International Network; April 26–28, 2017; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Easley J, Miedema B, Carroll JC, O'Brien MA, Manca DP, Grunfeld E. Patients experiences with continuity of cancer care in Canada: results from the CanIMPACT study. Can Fam Physician. 2016;62(10):821–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Hudson SV, Ohman-Strickland PA, Bator A, O'Malley D, Gundersen D, Lee HS, et al. Breast and prostate cancer survivors' experiences of patient-centered cancer follow-up care from primary care physicians and oncologists. J Cancer Surviv. 2016;10(5):906–14.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  70. Nyarko E, Metz JM, Nguyen GT, Hampshire MK, Jacobs LA, Mao JJ. Cancer survivors’ perspectives on delivery of survivorship care by primary care physicians: an internet-based survey. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16:143.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  71. Mao JJ, Bowman MA, Stricker CT, DeMichele A, Jacobs L, Chan D, et al. Delivery of survivorship care by primary care physicians: the perspective of breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(6):933–8.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  72. Anvik T, Holtedahl KA, Mikalsen H. “When patients have cancer, they stop seeing me” – the role of the general practitioner in early follow-up of patients with cancer – a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2006;7:19.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  73. Grunfeld E, Earle CC. The interface between primary and oncology specialty care: treatment through survivorship. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;2010(40):25–30.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  74. Miedema B, MacDonald I, Tatemichi S. Cancer follow-up care. Patients’ perspectives. Can Fam Physician. 2003;49:890–5.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. DesRoches J. Myth: Canada needs more doctors Accessed on 2012. Available from: http://www.aafp.org/news/practice-professional-issues/20150303aamcwkforce.html.

  76. American Academy of Family Physicians. Significant primary care, overall physician shortage predicted by 2025. AAFP; 2017 [cited 2017 February 15]; Available from: http://www.aafp.org/news/practice-professional-issues/20150303aamcwkforce.html.

  77. Australian Medical Association. No place for GP shortage. 2013 [cited 2017 February 15]; Available from: https://ama.com.au/ausmed/no-place-gp-shortage.

  78. Blanch-Hartigan D, Forsythe LP, Alfano CM, Smith T, Nekhlyudov L, Ganz PA, et al. Provision and discussion of survivorship care plans among cancer survivors: results of a nationally representative survey of oncologists and primary care physicians. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(15):1578–85.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  79. Rubin G, Berendsen A, Crawford SM, Dommett R, Earle C, Emery J, et al. The expanding role of primary care in cancer control. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(12):1231–72.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  80. Del Giudice ME, Grunfeld E, Harvey BJ, Piliotis E, Verma S. Primary care physicians’ views of routine follow-up care of cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(20):3338–45.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  81. Greenfield DM, Absolom K, Eiser C, Walters SJ, Michel G, Hancock BW, et al. Follow-up care for cancer survivors: the views of clinicians. Br J Cancer. 2009;101(4):568–74.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Brouwers MC, Vukmirovic M, Tomasone JR, Grunfeld E, Urquhart R, O'Brien MA, et al. Documenting coordination of cancer care between primary care providers and oncology specialists in Canada. Can Fam Physician. 2016;62(10):e616–e25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Maroun J. Shared cancer care: modeling collaboration between oncologist and family physicians. Oncology. Exchange. 2016;15(2):10–1.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Cancer Institute New South Wales. Shared care models: a high-level literature review. 2009; Available from: https://www.cancerinstitute.org.au/about-us/news/shared-care-models-a-high-level-literature-review.

  85. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Practice Guidelines: Models of Long-Term Follow-Up Care. 2017. https://www.asco.org/practice-guidelines/cancer-care-initiatives/prevention-survivorship/survivorship/survivorship-3. Accessed 20 May 2018

  86. Howell D, Hack TF, Oliver TK, Chulak T, Mayo S, Aubin M, et al. Models of care for post-treatment follow-up of adult cancer survivors: a systematic review and quality appraisal of the evidence. J Cancer Surviv. 2012;6(4):359–71.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Grant M, De Rossi S, Sussman J. Supporting models to transition breast cancer survivors to primary care: formative evaluation of a cancer care Ontario initiative. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11(3):e288–95.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  88. Oncology Nursing Society. Oncology nurse navigator core competencies. 2017. https://prod-www.ons.org/sites/default/files/2017-05/2017_Oncology_Nurse_Navigator_Competencies.pdf.

  89. Shockney LD. The evolution of breast cancer navigation and survivorship care. Breast J. 2015; 21(1):104–10.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  90. Halpern MT, Viswanathan M, Evans TS, Birken SA, Basch E, Mayer DK. Models of cancer survivorship care: overview and summary of current evidence. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11(1):e19–27.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  91. Baik SH, Gallo LC, Wells KJ. Patient navigation in breast cancer treatment and survivorship: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:3686–96.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  92. O'Malley D, Hudson SV, Nekhlyudov L, Howard J, Rubinstein E, Lee HS, et al. Learning the landscape: implementation challenges of primary care innovators around cancer survivorship care. J Cancer Surviv. 2017;11(1):13–23.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  93. Loblaw A, Souter LH, Canil C, Breau RH, Haider M, Jamnicky L, et al. Follow-up care for survivors of prostate cancer – clinical management: a program in evidence-based care systematic review and clinical practice guideline. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2017;29(11):711–7.

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Lam B, Lorham S, McIntosh A. Patient transition after active cancer treatment – how do we share care? a 2016 June 8, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Health Quality Ontatio. Patient engagement framework. 2018. http://www.hqontario.ca/Engaging-Patients/Patient-Engagement-Framework. Accessed 20 May 2018

  96. Walker S, Gibbins J, Paes P, Barclay S, Adams A, Chandratilake M, et al. Preparing future doctors for palliative care: views of course organisers. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2017. Epub ahead of print.

    Google Scholar 

  97. The Canadian Association of General Practioners in Oncology. Welcome to the CAGPO-ACMOQ. 2017. http://cagpo.ca/. Accessed 20 May 2018

  98. Klemp JR. Survivorship care planning: one size does not fit all. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2015;31(1):67–72.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  99. Mayer DK, Gerstel A, Leak AN, Smith SK. Patient and provider preferences for survivorship care plans. J Oncol Pract. 2012;8(4):e80–6.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  100. Mayer DK, Birken SA, Check DK, Chen RC. Summing it up: an integrative review of studies of cancer survivorship care plans (2006-2013). Cancer. 2015;121(7):978–96.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  101. Birken SA, Deal AM, Mayer DK, Weiner BJ. Determinants of survivorship care plan use in US cancer programs. J Cancer Educ. 2014;29(4):720–7.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Miedema, B. (2018). Primary Care. In: Feuerstein, M., Nekhlyudov, L. (eds) Handbook of Cancer Survivorship. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77432-9_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77432-9_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77430-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77432-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)