Advertisement

Scientific Methods of Geological and Paleontological Collections and Trends in Paleontological Investigation and Research

  • Cathrin HühneEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Natural History Collections book series (NHC)

Abstract

This article describes several conventional and modern methods and techniques in paleontological preparation and investigation. The main topics are the nondestructive methods which have been developed in the last decades. These methods are not only used in research projects of universities but also have become more and more useful tools in commonplace work on museums. In particular, computer tomography (CT, μCT), 3D scans and 3D prints offer the nondestructive investigation of internal and external structures of fossil remains as well as the possibility to cast them for display them in exhibitions. Other methods, like X-ray synchrotron-radiation microtomography (SR-μCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are also noted as methods of data analyses.

Due to the new abundance of produced digital datasets, whether created by the digital imaging procedures or created by the analyses process, data storing and data management is another focus of this article.

Keywords

Methods of preparation Computer tomography 3D scans 3D prints Functional analysis Database 

References

  1. Cnudde V, Masschaele B, Dierick M, Vlassenbroeck J, Van Hoorebeke L, Jacobs P (2006) Recent progress in X-ray CT as a geosciences tool. Appl Geochem 21(5):826–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cunningham JA, Rahman IA, Lautenschlager S, Rayfield EJ, Donoghue PCJ (2014) A virtual world of paleontology. Trends Ecol Evol 29(6):347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fastnacht M, Hess N, Frey E, Weiser H-P (2002) Finite element analysis in vertebrate palaeontology. Senckenb Lethaea 82(1):194–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jeppsson L, Anehus R, Fredholm D (1999) The optimal acetate buffered acetic acid technique for extracting phosphatic fossils. J Paleontol 73:964–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kosma R, Ritter A (2009) 3 D-Scannen, rapid prototyping und Rekonstruktion des Dinosaurierskeletts. In: Joger U (ed) Projekt Dino. Die Entdeckungsgeschichte neuer Dinosaurier in Niger, Afrika. Cargo Verlag, Schwülper, p 175 SGoogle Scholar
  6. Marcé-Nogué J, Klodowski A, Sánchez M, Gil L (2015) Coupling finite element analysis and multibody system dynamics for biological research. Palaeontologia Electronica 18.2.5T:1–14Google Scholar
  7. Panciroli E (2016) Getting under a fossil’s skin: how CT scans have changed palaeontology. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/mar/30/getting-under-a-fossils-skin-how-ct-scans-have-changed-palaeontology-dinosaur-lizard
  8. Rahman IA (2017) Computational fluid dynamics as a tool for testing functional and ecological hypotheses in fossil taxa. Palaeontology. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Tafforeau P, Boistel R, Boller E, Bravin A, Brunet M, Chaimannee Y, Cloetens P, Feist M, Hoszowska J, Jaeger J-J, Kay RF, Lazzari V, Marivaux L, Nel A, Nemoz C, Thibault X, Vignaud P, Zabler S (2006) Applications of X-ray synchrotron microtomography for non-destructive 3D studies of palaeontological specimens. Appl Phys A 83:195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Museum of Natural HistoryBraunschweigGermany

Personalised recommendations