Abstract
The practice of judicial rights in Nigeria leaves much to be desired. Judicial rights feature prominently in Nigeria’s Constitution since the country’s independence from colonial rule in 1960. But these constitutional provisions have not always been respected. Most notable infractions in this regard were recorded in the era of the military regimes, as a result of which the nation was treated internationally as a pariah State and put on the human rights agenda of the United Nations commission. Thanks to the support of the human rights groups that the country returned to the path of constitutionalism in 1999. However, the return to a democratic dispensation has had very minimal impact on the country’s human rights record: illegal arrests and pre-trial detentions, torture and inhuman treatment of suspects, and extrajudicial killings have continued on a large-scale. Due process is still not respected. The accidents of Nigeria’s history characterized chiefly by military rule left their ‘scars’ on the ‘Nigerian psyche’, without doubts and these appear to influence the ‘national culture.’ In this study, we want to find out whether these physical and or psychological injuries also account for the judicial rights’ attitudes of Nigeria’s citizens, especially the youth. The sample includes 1191 students of 18 secondary schools in Nigeria. The objective is to determine the students’ judicial rights attitudes. Whereas it was assumed that the perception of State influences their attitudes the most, the findings rather show the perception of religion as the main predictor of their generally negative evaluation of the said rights.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
According to Dada (2013, 2), chapter II contains mostly the economic, social and cultural rights which are not justiciable in Nigeria.
- 2.
The expression “a reasonable time” means – (a) in the case of an arrest or detention in any place where there is a court of competent jurisdiction within a radius of 40 km, a period of 1 day; and (b) in any other case, a period of 2 days or such longer period as in the circumstances may be considered by the court to be reasonable.
- 3.
According to Ani (2011, 52) this Act came into being as Ordinance No. 42 of 1945, and was re-enacted as ordinance No. 43 of 1948. It was incorporated as Cap 80 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria (hereafter LFN) 1990 and later as Cap. C 41 LFN 2004. The enactment govern criminal procedure in the Southern States of Nigeria.
- 4.
Like the CPA, the CPC was enacted by the Northern Region of Nigeria in 1960, and applied only to the Northern States. See Ani (52).
- 5.
This Act was derived from the Police Ordinance of 1943. After series of amendments, it is now Police Act Cap. P19 LFN 2004 (Ani, 53).
- 6.
Cap. E 14 LFN 2004.
- 7.
The need to improve the delivery of justice in Nigeria led to the fusion of the CPA and CPC into one principal federal Act, which is known as the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015. The Act was recently passed into law. However, the existing criminal procedures are substantially preserved. See Akinseye 2016.
- 8.
We made extensive use of the International Justice Resource Center’s post on the topic ‘torture’. See http://www.ijrcenter.org/thematic-researchguides/torture/#Defining_Cruel_Treatment_and_Torture. Accessed on 01.10.2015.
- 9.
These include, among others: African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, art. 5; American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man, art. 27; Arab Charter on Human Rights, arts 8; Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam, arts. 19–20; Convention on the Rights of the Child, art. 37; European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment; European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, art. 3; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, arts. 4, 7 & 10; United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners, art. 31; Universal Declaration of Human Rights, art. 5.
- 10.
1999 Constitution FRN section 34(1)(a).
- 11.
Article 15 CAT.
- 12.
(1993) 178 CLR 217, 245 per Gaudron and McHugh J.J. In: Hocking & Manville (69).
- 13.
Section 236 (1) (c) CPC.
- 14.
1999 Constitution FRN section 36 (11).
- 15.
The three sister rights, namely: right to counsel, right to remain silent, and protection against self-incrimination.
- 16.
Section 6 (a) (b) (c) ACJA 2015.
- 17.
See section 6 (1) CPA, section 28 Police Act, sections 44 (3), 78, 79 and 127 CPC and section 150 (1) CEMA. We got very useful information on this topic from Oghenesivbe (2014).
- 18.
Section 28 Police Act, section 1 CPA and section 44 CPC.
- 19.
Section 6 (2) CPA, section 44 (3) CPC, section 32 NDLEA and section 150 (1) CEMA.
- 20.
Section 82 CPC.
- 21.
Sections 4 Police Act.
- 22.
Section 147 (1) CEMA, section 32 NDLEA.
- 23.
See section 107 CPA, sections 74, 75 and 76 CPC.
- 24.
Section 109 (2) CPA.
- 25.
Section 111 (1) CPA.
- 26.
See also Sections 7, 8 and 112 (2) CPA and Sections 34 (3) and 84 CPC (Oghenesivbe 2014).
- 27.
Section 78 CPC (Oghenesivbe 2014).
- 28.
Section 15 Evidence Act 2011.
- 29.
Legal Aid Council of Nigeria, Third Edition 2008, p. 42.
- 30.
Legal Aids Council of Nigeria, Fifth Edition 2009, p. 6.
- 31.
Cap 205 LFN 1990.
- 32.
Cap L9 LFN 2004.
- 33.
[1988] 3 NWLR. (Pt. 4) 533 (Nigeria). In: Adeyemi (2007, 118, at footnotes).
- 34.
See Principle 17 of the UN Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment; Article 14 (30) (d) ICCPR.
- 35.
1999 Constitution FRN section 214 (1): Establishment of Nigeria Police Force.
- 36.
Sections 24 Police Act 1990. Also in Tawakalitu versus FRN (2011) 9 WRN, the court repeated emphasized “the power of the police to conduct all prosecution before any court of law in Nigeria.” In: Babalola (2014, 132, at footnotes). But this provision has been amended in the ACJA 2015.
- 37.
1999 Constitution FRN section 33 (2) (b).
- 38.
Article 13 CAT.
- 39.
See Principles 13 & 14 of the UN Basic Principles on the Use of Force and Firearms by Law Enforcement Officials.
- 40.
Section 341 Police Act Cap 359 LFN 1990.
- 41.
See Principle 20 of the UN Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extrajudicial, Arbitrary and Summary Executions.
- 42.
This statement is credited to the US-based International Coordinator, Ekiti Global Project, Mr. Adegboyega Omoeyeluajire Dahunsi. In: Igbonwelunduon (2015).
- 43.
1999 Constitution FRN sections 230–283.
- 44.
Alford (2012, 1256 at footnotes) used the expression in his work – A Broken Windows Theory of International Corruption. However, he noted that there has been no sustained analysis of the same theory as applied to corruption.
- 45.
Transparency International is a nonprofit, non-governmental, civil society organization that is dedicated to fighting corruption in international development.
- 46.
In the survey, residents of 107 countries were sampled based on active corruption indices. 85% of those sampled in Nigeria claimed that corruption had increased in the country in the last 2 years. Seventy-five percent of the residents state that the government was ineffective in the fight against corruption and 92% considered the police to be corrupt. See website for more information – https://www.transparency.org/gcb2013/country/?country=nigeria. Accessed on 01.12.2015; see also Ayobami (2015).
- 47.
The Danish Immigration Service (2005).
Abbreviations
- CAP:
-
Chapter
- CLR:
-
Commonwealth Law Reports
- FWLR:
-
Federal Weekly Law Report
- LFN:
-
Law of the Federation of Nigeria
- NCLR:
-
Nigerian Constitutional Law Reports
- NLR:
-
Nigeria Law Reports
- NMLR:
-
Nigeria Monthly Law Report
- NWLR:
-
Nigeria Weekly Law Report
- SC:
-
Supreme Court
References
Adedeji, L. (2015). Searches: The law and practice in Nigeria. Available at: http://thelawyerschronicle.com/searches-the-law-and-practice-in-nigeria/. Accessed 20 Dec 2017.
Adeyemi, A. A. (2007). A demand-side perspective on legal aid: What services do people need? The Nigerian situation. In K. Shaw & E. Walter (Eds.), Access to justice in Africa and beyond: Making the rule of law a reality. Illinois: Penal Reform International & Bluhm Legal Clinic of the Northwestern University School of Law.
Akinseye, G. Y. (2016). An Overview of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act 2015. Workshop Paper. Available at: http://nji.gov.ng/images/Workshop_Papers/2016/Refresher_Judicial_Officers/s02.pdf. Accessed on 1 Apr 2016.
Alford, R. P. (2012). A broken windows theory of international corruption. Ohio State Law Journal, 73(5), 1254–1282.
Amnesty International, Nigeria – security forces: serving to protect and respect human rights? (2002, December). AI Index: AFR 44/023/2002.
Amnesty International, Annual Report: Nigeria. (2013). Available at: http://www.amnestyusa.org/research/reports/annual-report-nigeria-2013?page=2.
Ani, C. C. (2011). Reforms in the Nigerian criminal procedure laws. NIALS Journal on Criminal Law and Justice, 1, 52–90.
Ayobami, A. (2014). You have the right to remain silent. Available at: http://theunilaglss.com.ng/author/unilaglss/. Accessed 2 Nov 2017.
Ayobami, L. (2015). Nigeria rated 8th most corrupt nation. Available at: http://porscheclassy.com.ng/. Accessed 2 Nov 2015.
Babalola, A. (2014). Power of police to prosecute criminal cases: Nigeria and international perspectives. European Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 2(11), 127–138.
Dada, J. A. (2012). Human rights under the Nigerian constitution: Issues and problems. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(12), 33–43.
Dada, J. A. (2013). Judicial remedies for human rights violations in Nigeria: A critical appraisal. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 10, 1–17.
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy. Evidence for a multidimensional approach. In Ziebertz, H. G., Döhnert, S., & Unser, A. (2017). Predictors of attitudes towards human dignity: An empirical analysis among youth in Germany. Religion and Human Rights, 2, 17–60.
Greene, J. R., et al. (Eds.). (2007). The encyclopedia of police science (3rd ed., 1 (A – I Index)). New York: Routledge.
Gwangndi, M. I. (2016). The socio-legal context of the Nigerian legal system and the Shariah controversy: An analysis of its impact on some aspects of Nigerian women’s rights. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 45, 60–66.
Harcourt, B. E. (2007). Broken-windows policing. In J. R. Greene, et al. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of police science (3rd ed., 1 (A – I Index)). New York: Routledge.
Hoffmann, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development. Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge: University Press.
Human Rights Watch. (1995). The Ogoni Crisis, A case study of military repression in Southeastern Nigeria. Available at: https://www.hrw.org/reports/1995/Nigeria.htm. Accessed 2 June 2015.
Human Rights Watch. (2004). “Political Shari’a”? Human Rights and Islamic Law in Northern Nigeria, 16(9A). Available at: https://www.hrw.org/reports/2004/nigeria0904/index.htm. Accessed 2 June 2015.
Hung-En, S. (2003). Fairer sex or fairer system? Gender and corruption revisited, 82. In R. P. Alford (2012). A broken windows theory of international corruption. Ohio State Law Journal, 73(5), 1254–1282.
Hunt, L. (2007). Inventing human rights. In J. A Van der Ven & H. G. Ziebertz (Eds.). (2013). Human rights and the impact of religion (p. 178). Leiden: Brill.
Igbonwelunduon, P. (2015). Independent judiciary will end corruption. The Nation Newspapers, May 18. Available at: http://thenationonlineng.net/. Accessed 1 June 2017.
Kelling, G. L., & Wilson, J. Q. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. Atlantic Monthly, 249(3), 29–38.
Maduewesi, E. (2010). Introduction to Legal Literacy in Nigeria 16. In Pro Bono Practices and Opportunities in Nigeria. Excerpt from: A Survey of Pro Bono Practices and Opportunities in Selected Jurisdictions. Prepared by Latham & Watkins LLP for the Pro Bono Institute.
Mohammed, M. (2015). Judicial corruption: Over 64 judges punished between 2009 and 2014. Vanguard Newspapers, October 24. Available at: http://www.vanguardngr.com/.
Nigeria. (1999). The constitution of the federal republic of Nigeria. Abuja: Federal Government of Nigeria.
Nigeria. (2015). Administration of criminal justice act. Abuja: Laws of the Federation.
Obi, N. I. E. (2010). World Factbook of Criminal Justice Systems – Nigeria. In Pro Bono Practices and Opportunities in Nigeria. Excerpt from: A Survey of Pro Bono Practices and Opportunities in Selected Jurisdictions. Prepared by Latham & Watkins LLP for the Pro Bono Institute.
Obilade, A. O. (1979). The Nigerian legal system. Ibadan: Sweet & Maxwell.
Odoeme, P. C. (2011). Human rights and the mission of the church in Nigeria. Tübingen: Lit-verlag.
Oghenesivbe, F. L. (2014). Criminal litigation: Legal execution of search warrants and admissibility of illegally or wrongfully obtained material evidence during searches. Available at: http://reformeronline.com/. Accessed on 6 Aug 2017.
Okeke, G. N. (2013). The ambivalence of the 1999 Nigerian constitution in matters relating to secularism: A case for a constitutional review. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 2(3), 65–69.
Okoronkwo, I. (2015). Legal Aid in Nigeria. Available at: http://thelawyerschronicle.com/legal-aid-in-nigeria/. Accessed 20 Dec 2015.
Osaghae, E., & Suberu, T. (2005). A history of identities, violence, and stability in Nigeria (Working Paper 6). Oxford: Centre for Research on Inequality, Human Security and Ethnicity (CRISE).
Palmer, A. (1995). Silence in court – The evidential significance of an accused person’s failure to testify. In B. A. Hocking & L. L. Manville (2001). What of the right to silence: Still supporting the presumption of innocence, or a growing legal fiction? Macquarie Law Journal, 1(1), 63–92.
Palmer, A. (1998). Principles of evidence. In B. A. Hocking & L. L. Manville (2001). What of the right to silence: Still supporting the presumption of innocence, or a growing legal fiction? Macquarie Law Journal, 1(1), 63–92.
Peters, R., & Barends, M. (2001). The reintroduction of Islamic criminal law in Northern Nigeria. Lagos: A Study Conducted on Behalf of the European Commission.
Randall, G., & Sheldon, R. G. (2005). Assessing ‘Broken Windows’: A brief critique. Center for Juvenile and Criminal Justice. Available at: http://www.cjcj.org/files/broken.pdf. Accessed on 2 June 2015.
Rothstein, B. (2011). The quality of Government: Corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective, 187. In R. P Alford (Ed.). (2012). A broken windows theory of international corruption. Ohio State Law Journal, 73(5), 1254–1282.
Shelden, R.G. (2005). Assessing ‘Broken Windows’: A Brief Critique. Center for Juvenile and criminal justice, pp. 1 – 17.
The Danish Immigration Service. (2005). Report on human rights issues in Nigeria. Joint British-Danish fact-finding mission to Abuja and Lagos, Nigeria: 19 October to 2 November 2004. Available at: http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/425ce4ba1.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2015.
United States Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor. Nigeria 2012 Human Rights Report. Available at: https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/204365.pdf. Accessed on 01.05.2015.
Ziebertz, H. G., & Reindl, M. (2013). Religion and attitudes towards euthanasia and abortion. In J. A. Van der Ven & H. G. Ziebertz (Eds.), Human rights and the impact of religion. Leiden: Brill.
Ziebertz, H. G., et al. (2012). Human rights among Muslims and Christians in Palestine and Germany. In J. A. Van der Ven & H. G. Ziebertz (Eds.), Tensions within and between religions and human rights. Leiden: Brill.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adimekwe, M., Ziebertz, HG. (2018). Predictors of Judicial Human Rights’ Attitudes of Adolescents in Nigeria. In: Sterkens, C., Ziebertz, HG. (eds) Political and Judicial Rights through the Prism of Religious Belief. Religion and Human Rights, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77353-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77353-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77352-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77353-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)