In Favour of Machines (But Not Forgetting the Workers): Some Considerations on the Fourth Industrial Revolution

  • Sergio Paba
  • Giovanni SolinasEmail author


This chapter aims to guide the reader in the analysis of some of the main themes proposed by the debate related to the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). First, we discuss the impact of the 4IR on employment by reviewing the results of the relevant economic literature, drawing some suggestions for future research. Second, we review some of the policies developed by governments to support the digital revolution. We argue that while Industry 4.0-type policies are common to all advanced countries, policies in favour of digital technologies in the service sector are more fragmented, difficult to implement, and face a stronger resistance from workers. We finish the paper with a discussion of the main policy issues related to the workers and the labour market, with a focus on robot tax, shared robot ownership, and universal basic income. We conclude by emphasizing that while policies in favour of machines are widespread and supported by wide social consensus, effective polices in favour of workers are much weaker and still unable to mitigate the negative effects of the digital revolution.


Machinery Digital revolution Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) Robots 


  1. Abbott, Ryan and Bret N. Bogenschneider. 2018. Should Robots Pay Taxes? Tax Policy in the Age of Automation, Harvard Law & Policy Review, 12:1. Accessed 11 Feb 2018.
  2. Acemoglu, Daron, and David H. Autor. 2011. Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings. In Handbook of Labor Economics 4, part B:1043–1171. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  3. Acemoglu, Daron, and Pascual Restrepo. 2017. Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets. NBER Working Paper 23285.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, Chris. 2017. Tax Bill Favors Adding Robots Over Workers, Critics Say. National Public Radio Inc. (US), December 8, 2017, 5:01 PM ET. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
  5. Arntz, Melanie, Gregory, Terry and U. Zierahn. 2016. The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Paper 189.Google Scholar
  6. Autor, David H. 2015. Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Autor, David H., and David Dorn. 2013. The Growth of Low-skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of US Labor Market. American Economic Review 103 (5): 1553–1557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beckett, Andy. 2018. Post-work: The Radical Idea of a World Without Jobs, The Guardian, 19 Jan 2018.Google Scholar
  9. Berg, Andrew, Edward F. Buffie, and Luis-Felipe Zanna. 2016. Robots, Growth, and Inequality. IMF Finance & Development, September, 53:3.Google Scholar
  10. Berriman, Richard, and John Hawksworth. 2017. Will Robots Steal Our Jobs? The Potential Impact of Automation on the UK and Other Major Economies. UK Economic Outlook, March 2017.Google Scholar
  11. Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Andrew McAfee. 2011. Race Against the Machine. How the Digital Revolution Is Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and the Economy. Lexington: Digital Frontier Press.Google Scholar
  12. Colin, Nicolas, and Bruno Palier. 2015. The Next Safety Net. Social Policy for a Digital Age. Foreign Affairs 94: 4.Google Scholar
  13. Council of Europe. Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development. 2018. The Case for a Basic Citizenship Income. DOC 14462. 5 Jan 2018.Google Scholar
  14. Dauth, Wolfgang, Sebastian Findeisen, Jens Südekum, and Nicole Woessner. 2017. German Robots – The Impact of Industrial Robots on Workers. CEPR Discussion Paper 12306. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
  15. Delany, Kevin. 2017. The Robot That Takes Your Job Should Pay Taxes, Says Bill Gates Quartz, February 17. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
  16. European Commission. 2017. Digital Transformation Monitor, National Initiatives. Accessed 12 April 2018.
  17. The European House-Ambrosetti. 2017. Technology and Labour: Steering the Change. Milan: The European House-Ambrosetti. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
  18. European Parliament. Committee on Legal Affairs. 2017. Report with Recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103(INL)). Rapporteur: Mady Delvaux. 27 January 2017. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
  19. The Federal Government. 2014. Speech by the Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel to the OECD Conference, 19 February 2014. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
  20. Freeman, Richard B. 2015. Who Owns the Robots Rules the World. IZA World of Labor. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
  21. Frey, Carl B., and Michael A. Osborne, 2013. The Future of Employment: How Susceptible Are Jobs to Computerization? Oxford Martin Programme on The Impact of Future Technologies, University of Oxford. Revised in Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017. 114:254–280.Google Scholar
  22. Goodkind, Nicole. 2017. Trump Tax Plan Gives Jobs Away to Robots and Will Increase Unemployment. 15 November 2017. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
  23. Graetz, Georg, and Guy Michaels. 2015. Robots at Work. CEPR Discussion paper 10477. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
  24. Gregory, Terry, Anna Salomons, and Zierahn Ultich. 2016. Racing With or Against the Machine? Evidence from Europe. ZEW Discussion Paper 16-053. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
  25. Guerreiro, Joao, Sergio Rebelo, and Pedro Teles. 2017. Should Robots Be Taxed?. NBER Working Paper 23806, September 2017, Revised January 2018. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
  26. Intereconomics. 2017. Universal Basic Income: The Promise vs. the Practicalities 52, March/April, No 2.Google Scholar
  27. International Federation of Robotics. 2017. Executive Summary World Robotics 2017 Industrial Robots. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
  28. Kagermann, Henning, Wolfgang Wahlster, and Johannes Helbig. 2013. Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group, April 2013. Acatech, Deutsche Akademie der Technikswissenschaften. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
  29. Keynes, John M. 1963. Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren, Essays in Persuasion, 358–373 (I ed. 1930). New York: W.W Norton and Co.Google Scholar
  30. McAfee, Andrew, and Erik Brynjolfsson. 2016. Human Work in the Robotic Future. Policy for the Age of Automation. Foreign Affairs, 95:4, July/August.Google Scholar
  31. Meyer, Henning. 2016. Inequality in the Second Machine Age. The Need for a Social Democratic Digital Society. Juncture (IPPR Progressive Review) 23: 2.Google Scholar
  32. Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico – MISE. 2017. Piano Nazionale Industria 4.0, Roma.Google Scholar
  33. Mokyr, Joel, Chris Vickers, and Nicolas Ziebarth. 2015. The History of Technological Anxiety and the Future of Economic Growth: Is This Time Different? Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. OECD. 2016. Enabling the Next Production Revolution. The Future of Manufacturing and Services – Interim Report. Meeting of the OECD Council at Ministerial Level, Paris, 1–2 June 2016. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
  35. ———. 2017.The Next Production Revolution: Implications for Governments and Business. Paris: OECD Publishing. Accessed 4 Feb 2018.
  36. Rodrik, Dany. 2015. Economics Rules: The Rights and Wrongs of the Dismal Science. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  37. Schwab, Klaus. 2016. The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  38. Shiller, Robert J. 2017. Narrative Economics. American Economic Review 107 (4): 967–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Standing, Guy. 2017. Basic Income: And How We Can Make It Happen. London: Pelican.Google Scholar
  40. Summers, Lawrence. 2017. Robots Are Wealth Creators and Taxing Them Is Illogical. Financial Times, 5 March 2017. Accessed 5 Feb 2018.
  41. U.K. Government. Office for Science. 2013. The Future of Manufacturing: A new era of opportunity and challenge for the UK. Project Report. London: U.K. Government. Office for Science. Accessed 5 Feb 2018.
  42. UNIDO, University of Cambridge, IfM. 2017. Emerging Trends in Global Advanced Manufacturing: Challenges, Opportunities and Policy Responses. Cambridge: Institute for Manufacturing. Accessed 5 Feb 2018.
  43. Van Parijs, Philippe, and Yannick Vanderborght. 2017. Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. World Economic Forum. 2016. The Future of Jobs. Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum, January 2016. Accessed 5 Feb 2018.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Marco Biagi Department of EconomicsUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaModenaItaly

Personalised recommendations