Skip to main content

The UK and Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The EU after Brexit

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics ((PSEUP))

  • 1376 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reviews the positive and negative aspects of the UK’s legacy for the European Union (EU). One of the key conclusions is that, whilst the UK has typically portrayed itself as a victim of the EU, in practice it has exercised a very real influence within the EU system. It is, however, an influence that it has consistently tended to underplay. The chapter then looks at the UK’s role during the Brexit process. This is followed by an examination of EU institutional jobs in the UK and UK institutional jobs in the EU. The chapter concludes with some thoughts on the continuing links between the UK and the EU after Brexit has occurred, and at the policy choices the UK has to make as regards its future relationship with the EU.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Figures cited in Hix, S., Hagemann, S., and Frantescu, D. (2016). Votewatch Special Report: “Would Brexit Matter? The UK’s Voting Record in the Council and European Parliament”.

  2. 2.

    Jonathan Hill resigned after the UK referendum and was replaced by Julian King.

  3. 3.

    Ironically a number of other Conservative MEPs were at the Conservative Party conference, and did not take part in the vote at all.

  4. 4.

    EP resolution of 7 February 2018 on the composition of the European Parliament, op. cit. in Chapter 5.

  5. 5.

    Contained in EP resolution of 7 February 2018 on the revision of the framework agreement between the European Parliament and the European Commission, also op. cit. in Chapter 5.

  6. 6.

    European Commissioner Oettinger, for example, is reported in Politico of 30 January 2018 as having promised to make a statement in March that UK permanent staff will not be asked to leave post-Brexit and that even other staff, such as contractual and temporary staff, will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

  7. 7.

    For example Matthew Baldwin in July 2016 in the area of mobility and transport and later Simon Mordue in November 2016 in the sensitive area of migration and home affairs, both posts within the European Commission.

  8. 8.

    This whole issue is the subject of a detailed set of slides from the EU Taskforce on negotiations with the UK, “Internal EU 27 Preparatory Discussions on the Framework for the Future Relationship, Level Playing Field”, published on 31 January 2018 and looking at the situation as regards taxation, state aids and environmental and labour standards.

  9. 9.

    The EU negotiating team document on a “Level Playing Field” (op. cit.) calculates, for example, that UK industry could make huge direct savings by reducing EU emission standards.

  10. 10.

    Possible regulatory divergence is going to be one of the key issues in such negotiations, where the EU is likely to push for the inclusion of a “non-regression clause” on regulatory standards on the lines of that included in the EU–Japan Trade Agreement.

Bibliography

UK Voting Record

  • Hix, S., Hagemann, S., and Frantescu, D. (2016). “Would Brexit Matter? The UK’s Voting Record in the Council and European Parliament”, Votewatch Special Report.

    Google Scholar 

UK Attitudes in the Run-Up to Brexit Referendum

  • Hannan, D. (2016). Why Vote Leave. London, Head of Zeus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle, R. (2015). The Risk of Brexit: Britain and Europe. Lanham, MD, Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • McShane, D. (2015). Why Britain Will Leave Europe. London, I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Sir 1. (24 November 2017). Speech on Brexit at Hertford College Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

UK Positions After Brexit Referendum

  • Clegg, N. (October 2017). How to Stop Brexit (and Make Britain Great Again). London, Bodley Head.

    Google Scholar 

  • McShane, D. (2016). How Britain Left Europe. London, I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • McShane, D. (2017). Brexit No Exit: Why (in the End) Britain Won’t Leave Europe. London, I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

UK Government Positions Since Brexit Referendum

Other Material

  • Duff, A. (2018). “Brexit: What If Britain Changes Its Mind?” European Policy Centre (EPC) Discussion Paper, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francis B Jacobs .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jacobs, F.B. (2018). The UK and Europe. In: The EU after Brexit . Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77279-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics