Skip to main content

Abstract

Motivated by the scientific desire to align observations with quantities of physical interest, we survey how scalar importance functions depend on vertically resolved water vapor. Definitions of importance begin from familiar examples of water mass Im and TOA clear-sky outgoing longwave flux IOLR, in order to establish notation and illustrate graphically how the sensitivity profile or ‘‘kernel’’ depends on whether specific humidity S, relative humidity R, or ln(R) are used as measures of vapor. Then, new results on the sensitivity of convective activity Icon to vapor (with implied knock-on effects such as weather prediction skill) are presented. In radiative-convective equilibrium, organized (line-like) convection is much more sensitive to moisture than scattered isotropic convection, but it exists in a drier mean state. The lesson for natural convection may be that organized convection is less susceptible to dryness and can survive and propagate into regions unfavorable for disorganized convection. This counterintuitive interpretive conclusion, with respect to the narrow numerical result behind it, highlights the importance of clarity about what is held constant at what values in sensitivity or susceptibility kernels. Finally, the sensitivities of observable radiance signals Isig for passive remote sensing are considered. While the accuracy of R in the lower free troposphere is crucial for the physical importance scalars, this layer is unfortunately the most difficult to isolate with passive remote sensing: In high emissivity channels, water vapor signals come from too high in the atmosphere (for satellites) or too low (for surface radiometers), while low emissivity channels have poor altitude discrimination and (in the case of satellites) are contaminated by surface emissions. For these reasons, active ranging (LiDAR) is the preferred observing strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adebiyi AA, Zuidema P, Abel SJ (2015) The convolution of dynamics and moisture with the presence of shortwave absorbing aerosols over the southeast Atlantic. J Clim 28:1997–2024. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-14-00352.1

  • Allan RP (2012) The role of water vapour in Earth’s energy flows. Surv Geophys 33(3–4):557–564

    Google Scholar 

  • Arakawa A (2004) The cumulus parameterization problem: past, present, and future. J Clim 17:2493–2525

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton CS, Peters ME, Back L (2004) Relationships between water vapor path and precipitation over the tropical oceans. J Clim 17:1517–1528

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogniez H, Fallourd R, Mallet C, Sivira R, Dufour C (2016) Estimating confidence intervals around relative humidity profiles from satellite observations: application to the SAPHIR sounder. J Atmos Ocean Technol 33:1005–1022. https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-15-0237.1

  • DeAngelis AM et al (2015) An observational radiative constraint on hydrologic cycle intensification. Nature 528:249–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Derbyshire S, Beau I, Bechtold P, Grandpeix J-Y, Piriou J-M, Redelsperger J-L, Soares P (2004) Sensitivity of moist convection to environmental humidity. Q J R Meteorol Soc 130:3055–3079. https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.130

  • Held IM, Shell KM (2012) Using relative humidity as a state variable in climate feedback analysis. J Clim 25(8):2578–2582

    Google Scholar 

  • Held IM, Soden BJ (2000) Water vapor feedback and global warming. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25:441–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway CE, Wing AA, Bony S, Muller C, Masunaga H, L’Ecuyer TS, Turner DD, Zuidema P (2017) Observing convective aggregation. Surv Geophy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-017-9419-1

  • Houze RAJ (1997) Stratiform precipitation in regions of convection: a meteorological paradox? Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78:2179–2196

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuang Z (2010) Linear response functions of a cumulus ensemble to temperature and moisture perturbations and implications for the dynamics of convectively coupled waves. J Atmos Sci 67:941–962

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuang Z (2012) Weakly forced mock-Walker cells. J Atmos Sci 69:2759–2786

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapes BE (2016) Gregarious convection and radiative feedbacks in idealized worlds. J Adv Model Earth Syst. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016ms00065

  • Mapes BE (2017) Toward form-function relationships for mesoscale structure in convection: a review. J Meteorol Soc Jpn (submitted)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapes BE, Chandra A, Kuang Z, Song S, Zuidema P (2017) Estimating convection’s moisture sensitivity: a model-observation synthesis using DYNAMO data. J Atmos Sci (in preparation)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mech M, Orlandi E, Crewell S, Ament F, Hirsch L, Hagen M, Peters G, Stevens B (2014) HAMP the microwave package on the high altitude and long range research aircraft HALO. Atmos Meas Tech 7:4539–4553. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4539-2014

  • Muller CJ, Back LE, O’Gorman PA, Emanuel KA (2009) A model for the relationship between tropical precipitation and column water vapor. Geophys Res Lett 36:L16804. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gl039667

  • Neelin JD, Peters O, Hales K (2009) The transition to strong convection. J Atmos Sci 66:2367–2384. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jas2962.1

  • Nehrir AR et al (2017) Emerging technologies and synergies for airborne and space-borne measurements of water vapor profiles. Surv Geophy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-017-9436-0 (this volume)

  • Nicholls ME, Johnson RH, Cotton WR (1988) The sensitivity of two-dimensional simulations of tropical squall lines to environmental profiles. J Atmos Sci 45:3625–3649. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1988)045<3625:TSOTDS>2.0.CO;2

  • Nicholson SE (2013) The West African Sahel: a review of recent studies on the rainfall regime and its interannual variability. ISRN Meteorol, vol. 2013, Article ID 453521. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/453521

  • Nolan DS, Tulich SN, Blanco JE (2016) ITCZ structure as determined by parameterized versus explicit convection in aquachannel and aquapatch simulations. J Adv Model Earth Syst 8:425–452. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015ms000560

  • Nolte DD (2010) The tangled tale of phase space. Phys Today 63:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert RT, Brogniez H, Roca R (2007) On the relative humidity of the Earth’s atmosphere. In: Schneider T, Sobel A (eds) The global circulation of the atmosphere: phenomena, theory, challenges. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus R et al (2017) The representation of tropospheric water vapor over low-latitude oceans in (re-) analysis. Errors, impacts, and the ability to exploit current and prospective observations. Surv Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-017-9437-z (this volume)

  • Previdi M (2010) Radiative feedbacks on global precipitation. Environ Res Lett 5:025211. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/025211

  • Sherwood SC, Roca R, Weckwerth TM, Andronova NG (2010) Tropospheric water vapor, convection, and climate. Rev Geophys 48(2):RG2001. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009rg000301

  • Soden B, Shell Karen M, Kiehl Jeffrey T, Shields Christine A (2008) Quantifying climate feedbacks using radiative kernels. J Clim 21:3504–3520. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007jcli2110.1

  • Spencer RW, Braswell William D (1997) How dry is the tropical free troposphere? Implications for global warming theory. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78:1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477

  • Stephens GL, Ellis TD (2008) Controls of global-mean precipitation increases in global warming GCM experiments. J Clim 21:6141–6155

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens B, Brogniez H, Kiemle C, Lacour J-L, Crevoisier C, Kiliani J (2017) Structure and dynamical influence of water vapor in the lower tropical troposphere. Surv Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-017-9420-8

  • Takemi T, Satomura T (2000) Numerical experiments on the mechanisms for the development and maintenance of long-lived squall lines in dry environments. J Atmos Sci 57:1718–1740

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulich S, Mapes BE (2010) Transient environmental sensitivities of explicitly simulated tropical convection. J Atmos Sci 67:923–940. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009jas3277.1

  • Vial J, Dufresne J-L, Bony S (2013) On the interpretation of inter-model spread in CMIP5 climate sensitivity estimates. Clim Dyn 41:3339–3362

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing AA, Emanuel K, Holloway CE, Muller C (2017) Convective self-aggregation in numerical simulations: a review. Surv Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-017-9408-4

  • Zhang J, Zuidema P, Turner D, Cadeddu M (2017) Tropical humidity vertical structure inferred from a microwave radiometer over the equatorial Indian Ocean. J Appl Meteorol

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is based on work supported by U.S. NOAA Grant NA13OAR4310156 and NASA Grant NNX15AD11G. Mario Mech kindly contributed the unpublished Fig. 6, related to a similar figure in Mech et al. (2014). We are grateful for comments by Bjorn Stevens, Robert Pincus, and anonymous reviewers whose efforts greatly improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Mapes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mapes, B., Chandra, A.S., Kuang, Z., Zuidema, P. (2017). Importance Profiles for Water Vapor. In: Pincus, R., Winker, D., Bony, S., Stevens, B. (eds) Shallow Clouds, Water Vapor, Circulation, and Climate Sensitivity. Space Sciences Series of ISSI, vol 65. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77273-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics