Social science literature suggests that social networks play an important role in developing human and social capital, particularly in the education space. Human capital refers to the knowledge, training, experience, and perceptions that reside within an individual, and social capital reflects the resources that are generated from the social interactions of individual actors. While most studies in education focus on either human or social capital of educators in schools, very little attention has been paid to the idea of “intellectual capital,” which includes the interactions between human and social capital. Further, even less attention has been paid to the intellectual capital among school leaders, particularly in social settings that involve a high degree of human interaction. In addition to intellectual capital, we explore a more traditional form of capital, that of financial capital in the form of salary. This chapter attempts to fill this gap by exploring intellectual capital in the form of human (demographics and perceptions) and social capital and its relationship with actors’ salary, gender, and the level of organizational commitment. The study takes place in one large urban fringe school district with 29 schools serving diverse student populations in southern California. We collected data from all 29 principals, including social network data, demographics, perceptions of organizational commitment, and publicly available salary information. Key findings suggest that principals’ network positions vary by salary and by gender. Specifically, those principals with higher salaries are less likely to be connected with their principal colleagues. Male principals are more likely to have more mutual ties than female principals. For male principals, regardless of salary, their level of mutual ties was much greater when they also reported more organizational commitment. This chapter adds to the existing knowledge base around organizational network studies and sheds new light on educational leadership.
- Social network
- Organizational commitment
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use onlyLearn about institutional subscriptions
Quadratic assignment procedure (QAP) is designed to test the statistical significance for social network data that is interdependence in nature. Unlike parametric statistical techniques, which assume observations that are analyzed are independent of one another, QAP is a nonparametric technique with no assumption of independence between observations. While using parametric statistics for social network data violates the assumption of independence, QAP is a suitable analytic strategy to test the statistical significance of social network data that are interdependent to one another. More information about QAP can be obtained from Hanneman and Riddle’s (2005) tutorial.
Meyerson, E. M. (1994). Human capital, social capital and compensation: the relative contribution of social contacts to managers' incomes. Acta Sociologica, 37(4), 383–399.
Boxman, E. A., De Graaf, P. M., & Flap, H. D. (1991). The impact of social and human capital on the income attainment of Dutch managers. Social networks, 13(1), 51–73.
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.
Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242–266.
Lin, N. (2009). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action (8th ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Liou, Y.-H., & Daly, A. J. (2014). Closer to learning: Social networks, trust, and professional communities. Journal of School Leadership, 24(4), 753–795.
Scott, J. (2000). Social network analysis. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Lin, N. (1999). Building a network theory of social capital. Connections, 22(1).
Lincoln, J., & Miller, J. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relational networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 181–198.
McPherson, J. M., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1987). Homophily in voluntary organizations: Status distance and the composition of face-to-face groups. American sociological review, 370–379.
Burt, R. S. (1976). Positions in networks. Social Forces, 55, 93–122.
Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative science quarterly, 518–539.
Ronchetto Jr, J. R., Hutt, M. D., & Reingen, P. H. (1989). Embedded influence patterns in organizational buying systems. The Journal of Marketing, 51–62.
Friedkin, N. E. (1993). Structural bases of interpersonal influence in groups: A longitudinal case study. American Sociological Review, 861–872.
Bond, E. U., Walker, B. A., Hutt, M. D., & Reingen, P. H. (2004). Reputational effectiveness in cross-functional working relationships. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(1), 44–60.
Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In Barry M. S., & L. L. Cummings (Eds), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 169–211). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Becker, G. S. (1992). The economic way of looking at life. Nobel Lecture, Chicago.
Becker, G. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. New York, NY: Columbia University.
Lindbeck, A. (1992). Macroeconomic theory and the labor market. European Economic Review, 36(2–3), 209–235.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. C. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(1), 1360–1380.
Williamson, O. (1993). Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. The Journal of Law & Economics, 36(1), 453–486.
Dasgupta, P. (2000). Trust as a commodity. In Gambetta, D. (Ed.), Trust: Making and breaking cooperative relations (pp. 49–72). Department of Sociology, University of Oxford.
Hackett, R. D., Bycio, P., & Hausdorf, P. A. (1994). Further assessments of Meyer and Allen’s (1991) three-component model of organizational commitment. Journal of applied psychology, 79(1), 15–23.
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990). A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological bulletin, 108(2), 171.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Pittinsky, T. L., & Shih, M. J. (2004). Knowledge nomads: Organizational commitment and worker mobility in positive perspective. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 791–807.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89.
Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Bashaw, R. E., & Grant, E. S. (1994). Exploring the distinctive nature of work commitments: Their relationships with personal characteristics, job performance, and propensity to leave. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 14(2), 41–56.
Dutton, J. E., & Ragins, B. R. E. (2007). Exploring positive relationships at work: Building a theoretical and research foundation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Wiley.
Gittell, J. H., Cameron, K., Lim, S., & Rivas, V. (2006). Relationships, layoffs, and organizational resilience: Airline industry responses to September 11. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(3), 300–329.
Dittes, J. E., & Kelley, H. H. (1956). Effects of different conditions of acceptance upon conformity to group norms. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53(1), 100.
Lee, J., & Kim, S. (2011). Exploring the role of social networks in affective organizational commitment: Network centrality, strength of ties, and structural holes. The American Review of Public Administration, 41(2), 205–223.
Brass, D. J., Galaskiewicz, J., Greve, H. R., & Tsai, W. (2004). Taking stock of networks and organizations: A multilevel perspective. Academy of management journal, 47(6), 795–817.
March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Organizations revisited. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2(1), 299–316.
Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of vocational behavior, 14(2), 224–247.
Mottaz, C. J. (1987). Age and work satisfaction. Work and Occupations, 14(3), 387–409.
Mottaz, C. J. (1989). An analysis of the relationship between attitudinal commitment and behavioral commitment. The Sociological Quarterly, 30(1), 143–158.
Roberts, K. H., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1979). Some correlations of communication roles in organizations. Academy of management journal, 22(1), 42–57.
Brass, D. J. (1981). Structural relationships, job characteristics, and worker satisfaction and performance. Administrative science quarterly, 331–348.
Krackhardt, D., & Porter, L. W. (1986). The snowball effect: Turnover embedded in communication networks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(1), 50.
Hartman, R. L., & Johnson, J. D. (1989). Social contagion and multiplexity communication networks as predictors of commitment and role ambiguity. Human Communication Research, 15(4), 523–548.
Wagner, W. G., Pfeffer, J., & O’Reilly III, C. A. (1984). Organizational demography and turnover in top-management group. Administrative Science Quarterly, 74–92.
McPherson, J. M., Popielarz, P. A., & Drobnic, S. (1992). Social networks and organizational dynamics. American sociological review, 153–170.
Hultin, M., & Szulkin, R. (1999). Wages and unequal access to organizational power: An empirical test of gender discrimination. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(3), 453–472.
Rogers, E. M., & Kincaid, D. L. (1981). Communication networks: toward a new paradigm for research. New York, NY: Free Press
Brass, D. J. (1985). Men’s and women’s networks: A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management journal, 28(2), 327–343.
Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, opportunity, and diversity of social circles in managerial networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 673–703.
Moore, G. (1990). Structural determinants of men’s and women’s personal networks. American Sociological Review, 726–735.
Pugliesi, K., & Shook, S. L. (1998). Gender, ethnicity, and network characteristics: Variation in social support resources. Sex Roles, 38(3–4), 215–238.
Heyl, E. (1996). Het docentennetwerk. Structuur en invloed van collegiale contacten binnen scholen. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Twente, The Netherlands.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology, 27(1), 415–444.
Mehra, A., Kilduff, M., & Brass, D. J. (2001). The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46 (1), 121–146.
Fischer, C. S., & Oliker, S. J. (1983). A research note on friendship, gender, and the life cycle. Social Forces, 62, 124.
Marsden, P. V. (1987). Core discussion networks of Americans. American sociological review, 122–131.
Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 37, 422–47.
Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The role of collective efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(4), 496–528.
Daly, A. J., Liou, Y., Tran, N. A., Cornelissen, F., & Park, V. (2014). The rise of neurotics: Social networks, leadership, and efficacy in district reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(2), 233–278.
Cervone, H. F. (2008). Breaking out of Sacred Cow culture: The relationship of professional advice networks to receptivity to innovation in academic librarians. In Williams, D. & Golden, J., Advances in library administration and organization (Vol. 26, pp. 71–149).
Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for school improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. In R.I. Sutton & B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behaviour (pp. 345–423). Greenwich, CT: JAI press.
Fearon, C., McLaughlin, H., & Morris, L. (2013). Conceptualising work engagement: An individual, collective and organisational efficacy perspective. European journal of training and development, 37(3), 244–256.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
Pfeffer, J. (1989). A political perspective on careers: Interests, networks, and environments. In M. B. Arthur, D. T. Hall & B. S. Lawrence (Eds.), Handbook of career theory (pp. 380–396). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Ely, R. J. (1995). The power in demography: Women’s social constructions of gender identity at work. Academy of Management journal, 38(3), 589–634.
Turner, J. C., Sachdev, I., & Hogg, M. A. (1983). Social categorization, interpersonal attraction and group formation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22(3), 227–239.
Labianca, G., & Brass, D. J. (2006). Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 596–614.
Editors and Affiliations
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Daly, A.J., Liou, YH., Bjorklund, P. (2018). Pay, Position, and Partnership: Exploring Capital Resources Among a School District Leadership Team. In: Cramer, C., Porter, M., Sayama, H., Sheetz, L., Uzzo, S. (eds) Network Science In Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77237-0_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77236-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77237-0