A Continuous-Time Approach to Intensive Longitudinal Data: What, Why, and How?
The aim of this chapter is to (a) provide a broad didactical treatment of the first-order stochastic differential equation model—also known as the continuous-time (CT) first-order vector autoregressive (VAR(1)) model—and (b) argue for and illustrate the potential of this model for the study of psychological processes using intensive longitudinal data. We begin by describing what the CT-VAR(1) model is and how it relates to the more commonly used discrete-time VAR(1) model. Assuming no prior knowledge on the part of the reader, we introduce important concepts for the analysis of dynamic systems, such as stability and fixed points. In addition we examine why applied researchers should take a continuous-time approach to psychological phenomena, focusing on both the practical and conceptual benefits of this approach. Finally, we elucidate how researchers can interpret CT models, describing the direct interpretation of CT model parameters as well as tools such as impulse response functions, vector fields, and lagged parameter plots. To illustrate this methodology, we reanalyze a single-subject experience-sampling dataset with the R package ctsem; for didactical purposes, R code for this analysis is included, and the dataset itself is publicly available.
We thank an editor and anonymous reviewer for helpful comments that led to improvements in this chapter. The work of the authors was supported by grants from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO Onderzoekstalent 406-15-128) to Oisín Ryan and Ellen Hamaker, and (NWO VENI 451-16-019) to Rebecca Kuiper.
- Boker, S. M., Deboeck, P., Edler, C., & Keel, P. (2010a). Generalized local linear approximation of derivatives from time series. In S. Chow & E. Ferrar (Eds.), Statistical methods for modeling human dynamics: An interdisciplinary dialogue (pp. 179–212). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
- Boker, S. M., Montpetit, M. A., Hunter, M. D., & Bergeman, C. S. (2010b). Modeling resilience with differential equations. In P. Molenaar & K. Newell (Eds.), Learning and development: Individual pathways of change (pp. 183–206). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12140-011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Bringmann, L., Pe, M., Vissers, N., Ceulemans, E., Borsboom, D., Vanpaemel, W., …Kuppens, P. (2016). Assessing temporal emotion dynamics using networks. Assessment, 23(4), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116645909
- Bringmann, L., Vissers, N., Wichers, M., Geschwind, N., Kuppens, P., Peeters, …Tuerlinckx, F. (2013). A network approach to psychopathology: New insights into clinical longitudinal data. PLoS ONE, 8, e60188. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060188
- Browne, M. W., & Nesselroade, J. R. (2005). Representing psychological processes with dynamic factor models: Some promising uses and extensions of ARMA time series models. In A. Maydue-Olivares & J. J. McArdle (Eds.), Psychometrics: A festschrift to Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 415–452). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Driver, C. C., & Voelkle, M. C. (2018). Hierarchical Bayesian continuous time dynamic modeling. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/met0000168 Google Scholar
- Fisher, M. (2001). Modeling negative autoregression in continuous time. http://www.markfisher.net/mefisher/papers/continuous_ar.pdf
- Horn, E. E., Strachan, E., & Turkheimer, E. (2015). Psychological distress and recurrent herpetic disease: A dynamic study of lesion recurrence and viral shedding episodes in adults. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 134–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.988994 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnston, J., & DiNardo, J. (1997). Econometric methods (4th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Kim, C.-J., & Nelson, C. R. (1999). State-space models with regime switching: Classical and Gibbs-sampling approaches with applications. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669796
- Kuiper, R. M., & Ryan, O. (2018). Drawing conclusions from cross-lagged relationships: Re-considering the role of the time-interval. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2018.1431046
- Oud, J. H. L. (2007). Continuous time modeling of reciprocal relationships in the cross-lagged panel design. In S. M. Boker & M. J. Wenger (Eds.), Data analytic techniques for dynamic systems in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 87–129). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Oud, J. H. L., & Delsing, M. J. M. H. (2010). Continuous time modeling of panel data by means of SEM. In K. van Montfort, J. H. L. Oud, & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal research with latent variables (pp. 201–244). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11760-2-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oud, J. H. L., van Leeuwe, J., & Jansen, R. (1993). Kalman filtering in discrete and continuous time based on longitudinal lisrel models. In Advances in longitudinal and multivariate analysis in the behavioral sciences (pp. 3–26). Nijmegen: ITS.Google Scholar
- Rovine, M. J., & Walls, T. A. (2006). Multilevel autoregressive modeling of interindividual differences in the stability of a process. In T. A. Walls & J. L. Schafer (Eds.), Models for intensive longitudinal data (pp. 124–147). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195173444.003.0006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Voelkle, M., & Oud, J. H. L. (2013). Continuous time modelling with individually varying time intervals for oscillating and non-oscillating processes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02043.x MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar