Skip to main content

Interrupting Transparency

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transparency, Society and Subjectivity

Abstract

Certain aspects of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and the early days of his administration challenged a binary visual code that pits opacity against openness, as well as a teleological narrative that establishes transparency as the logical incarnation of Enlightenment ideals and an administrative norm today. Because of the ideological nature of contemporary transparency tools, an interruption of technocratic transparency in its data-driven form might not in all circumstances be a regressive move. While recognizing the risks inherent in a displacement of technocratic transparency by a figure like Trump, Birchall explores the possibility of utilizing the unsettled conditions of visibility, in which openness and obfuscation merge, to recalibrate and radicalize the politics of transparency.

I would like to thank Emmanuel Alloa and Dieter Thomä for their invitation to the University of St. Gallen and for their astute comments on a draft of this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In terms of European history, many histories of transparencies cite Anders Chydenius’s “Ordinance on Freedom of Writing and of the Press” (1766), instituting offentlighetsprincipen, the principle of publicity, into Swedish civic life, as the earliest example of a modern government committed to publicity.

  2. 2.

    Mark Fenster elaborates: “[Trump’s ] hostility to criticism and apparent distaste for the First Amendment, his penchant for controlling information about himself, and his never having been subject to public transparency laws in his business career suggest that his administration will not be more compliant with the spirit or letter of open government laws than those that came before and may well be less so” (2017: 173).

Works Cited

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clare Birchall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Birchall, C. (2018). Interrupting Transparency. In: Alloa, E., Thomä, D. (eds) Transparency, Society and Subjectivity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77161-8_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics