Quality Indicators, Outcomes, and Performance Pay

  • James S. Powers
Chapter

Abstract

The history of the centers for Medicare Medicaid Services (CMS) involvement in quality improvement is long-standing. Linking performance metrics to payment is a powerful lever to stimulate healthcare improvement and maintenance of quality. This may also improve consistency and standardization of healthcare practices across regions.

Keywords

Quality indicators Performance metrics Healthcare practices 

References

  1. 1.
    National Academies of Science Engineering and Medicine. Improving the quality of care in nursing homes. 1986. http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/1986/Improving-the-Quality-of-Care-in-Nursing-Homes.aspx. Accessed 17 Nov 2017.
  2. 2.
    Mitchell E. Population-based payment models: overcoming barriers, accelerating adoption. May 16, 2016. https://hcp-lan.org/2016/05/pbp-models-overcoming-barriers-accelerating-adoption/. Accessed 17 Nov 2017.
  3. 3.
    Institute of Medicine. Vital signs: core metrics for health and health care progress. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2015.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Office of the Federal Register. Medicare Program; Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) incentive under the physician fee schedule, and criteria for physician-focused payment models, 42 CFR Parts 414 and 495. Published in the Federal Register 11/4/16: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/11/04/2016-25240/medicare-program-merit-based-incentive-payment-system-mips-and-alternative-payment-model-apm. Accessed 17 Nov 2017.
  5. 5.
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Quality payment programs. Executive summary. https://qpp.cms.gov/docs/QPP_Executive_Summary_of_Final_Rule.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2017.
  6. 6.
    Unroe KT, Hollmann PA, Goldstein AC, Maline ML. Medicare access and CHIP reauthorization intact: what do geriatrics healthcare professionals need to know about the quality payment program? JAGS. 2017;65:674–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    American College of Physicians. Comment: Medicare Program; Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive under the Physician fee schedule, and criteria for physician-focused payment models [CMS-5517-FC]. https://www.acponline.org/acp_policy/letters/avp_comment_letter_to_cms_on_macra_final_rule_2016.pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2017.
  8. 8.
    McWilliams JM. MACRA: big fix or big problem? Ann Intern Med. 2017;167:122–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gagliano N. Satisfaction vs burnout. Value-based strategies that motivate. Group Pract J. 2017:15–17.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Medicare’s Quality Improvement Organization program: Maximizing potential. Pathways to healthcare. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11604.html. Accessed 17 Nov 2017.
  11. 11.
    Jencks SF, Huff ED, Cuerdon T. Change in the quality of care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries, 1998–1999 to 2000–2001. JAMA. 2003;289:305–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Snyder C, Anderson G. Do quality improvement organizations improve the quality of hospital care for Medicare beneficiaries? JAMA. 2005;293:2900–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mims AD, Pederson JC, Gold JA. Healthcare changes and the affordable care act: a physician call to action quality improvement organizations. In: Powers JS, editor. Healthcare changes and the affordable care act. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015. p. 13–31.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chassin MR, Loeb JM, Schmaltz SP, Wachter RM. Accountability measures–using measurement to promote quality improvement. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:683–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baker DW, Chassin MR. Holding providers accountable for healthcare outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167:418–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burstin H, Qaseem A. Moving to measures that matter and motivate change. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167:442–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schuster MA, Oronata SE, Meltzer DO. Measuring the cost of quality measurement: a missing link in quality strategy. JAMA. 2017;318:1219–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • James S. Powers
    • 1
  1. 1.Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Geriatric Research Education and Clinical CenterNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations