Abstract
This chapter explores the nexus between security and gentrification in the case of Roma people in Cluj, Romania, who were evicted from their homes in the winter of 2010 and relocated to the slum area of Pata Rât. Mireanu argues that the political economy of urban gentrification is intimately intertwined with mechanisms of exclusion and control through processes of security. He discusses the context of gentrification in post-communist Romania and how this leads to the dire situation of a ‘housing paradox’ for the Roma people—the impossibility of using the urban space due to systematic exclusions. After discussing the eviction and the relocation as assemblages of security, the author highlights the political and economic role that the Roma perform in the specific urban context of these processes.
I would like to thank Dr. Maria Gkresta, who contributed significantly to the sections on the evictions and the relocation. Earlier drafts of the argument presented here have been written together with her. My special gratitude goes to the three editors of this volume, for their numerous comments and suggestions, as well as for their infinite patience while dealing with the entire process of editing. Not in the last place, I am grateful to Peggy Birch and Chris Engert, the language editors, for clarifying my text and making it more elegant.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
This Foucauldian approach is used, in the case that I present in this chapter, to highlight the limits to circulation imposed on the Roma on the one hand, and the intersection between the different mechanisms aimed at the Roma people—expulsion, coercion, containment, and control—on the other hand. These mechanisms come to complement a purely process-based approach to security, which is only concerned with how the Roma have been constructed discursively as a threat. The concept of a security dispositif illustrates the plethora of mechanisms through which the Roma are managed as a problematic population which poses a security problem.
- 2.
Here, my point of view differs from that of Enikő Vincze (2012a: 65) who, in the general Romanian discourse, understands the racialization of the Roma as an explanation of their economic precarity and as a technology through which they are ‘de-proletarized’. While I agree with the importance of race, I argue for the continued relevance of class. The Roma are also considered to be a security problem because they are poor, not only because they are racialized.
- 3.
A survey published in 2013 showed that more than 50% of Romanians would prefer not to have Roma as neighbours. The same poll showed that 68% of the respondents believed that the Roma are more likely to be criminals than other Romanians (Agerpres 2013).
- 4.
Law 202/2010, paragraph 38, article 578,1, published in Monitorul Oficial, Part I, Nr. 714, 26 October 2010, available at http://www.dreptonline.ro/legislatie/legea_202_2010_masuri_pentru_accelerarea_solutionarii_proceselor_mica_reforma_a_justitiei.php (accessed 4 September 2017).
- 5.
For instances of these acts of resistance, see Desire Foundation (2014).
References
Agerpres. 2013. Sondaj de opinie: 65% dintre români cred că în țara noastră există o problemă cu romii. February 7. Available at https://www.agerpres.ro/social/2013/02/07/sondaj-de-opinie-65-dintre-romani-cred-ca-in-tara-noastra-exista-o-problema-cu-romii-16-25-32. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Amnesty International. 2013a. Romania: Equality Body Decision on Discrimination of Roma by Cluj-Napoca Municipality Now Final. May 31. Available at https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur39/007/2013/en/. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
———. 2013b. Pushed to the Margins: Five Stories of Roma Forced Evictions in Romania. June 18. Available at https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/EUR39/003/2013/en/. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Amoore, L., and M. de Goede. 2008. Transactions After 9/11: The Banal Face of the Preemptive Strike. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33 (2): 173–185.
Aradau, C., and R. van Munster. 2007. Governing Terrorism Through Risk. European Journal of International Relations 13 (1): 89–115.
Arias, G. 2011. The Normalisation of Exception in the Biopolitical Security Dispositive. International Social Science Journal 62 (205–6): 363–375.
Bacalu, M. 2017. Pretenţiile persoanelor evacuate de primăria Cuj de pe strada Coastei în colonia Pata Rât au fost respinse irevocabil. Ora de Stiri Cluj, April 14. Available at http://oradecluj.oradestiri.ro/pretentiile-persoanelor-evacuate-de-primaria-cuj-de-pe-strada-coastei-in-colonia-pata-rat-au-fost-respinse-irevocabil. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Balzacq, T. 2014. The “Essence” of Securitization: Theory, Ideal Type, and a Sociological Science of Security. International Relations 29 (1): 1–41.
Becker, A., and M. Müller. 2013. The Securitization of Urban Space and the “Rescue” of Downtown Mexico City. Latin American Perspectives 40 (2): 77–94.
Bigo, D. 2008. International Political Sociology. In Security Studies. An Introduction, ed. P. Williams, 116–130. London: Routledge.
Bigo, D., and A. Tsoukala. 2008. Understanding (In)security. In Terror, Insecurity and Liberty, ed. D. Bigo and A. Tsoukala, 1–9. London: Routledge.
Boncuţiu, S. 2009. Maghernite in Curtea Nokia. Gazeta de Cluj, June 14. Available at http://gazetadecluj.ro/maghernite-in-curtea-nokia/. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Brenner, N., and N. Theodore. 2002. Cities and the Geographies of “Actually Existing Neoliberalism”. Antipode 34 (3): 349–379.
———. 2005. Neoliberalism and the Urban Condition. City 9 (1): 101–107.
Buzan, B., O. Waever, and J. de Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework of Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
C.A.S.E. Collective. 2006. Critical Approaches to Security in Europe: A Networked Manifesto. Security Dialogue 37 (4): 443–487.
Chelcea, L., and G. Pulay. 2015. Networked Infrastructures and the “Local”. City 19 (2–3): 344–355.
Ciobanu, Claudia. 2017. Roma Fear There Is No Place for Them as Romania’s Cities Modernize. Reuters, March 22. Available at http://www.reuters.com/article/us-romania-roma-property-feature-idUSKBN16T043. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Cluj City Hall. 2011. Documents Regarding the Donation of Land in Coastei Street. Available (as Pdf File in Romanian) at http://www.primariaclujnapoca.ro/userfiles/files/PH%20Mapa%2010.05.2011/PH1_10.05.2011.PDF. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Clujust. 2016. Polițiștii au făcutrazie la PataRât. March 24. Available at http://www.clujust.ro/politistii-au-facut-razie-la-pata-rat-au-fost-ridicate-20-de-persoane-si-6-caini-comunitari-video/. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Coaffee, J., and D. Wood. 2006. Security Is Coming Home. International Relations 20 (4): 503–517.
Coward, M. 2009. Network-Centric Violence, Critical Infrastructure and the Urbanization of Security. Security Dialogue 40 (4–5): 399–418.
Creta, E., and P. Fekete. 2012. Roma Community Forcibly Evicted from Coastei Street Share Their Story. Amnesty International, April 4. Available at https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2012/04/roma-community-forcibly-evicted-from-coastei-street-share-their-story/. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Criticatac. 2011. Apel pentru solidaritate şi acţiune împotriva proiectului primăriei clujene: “locuinţe sociale” în Pata Rât. Criticatac. Available at http://www.criticatac.ro/4392/apel-pentru-solidaritate-si-actiune-impotriva-proiectul-primariei-clujene-%E2%80%9Elocuinte-sociale%E2%80%9D-in-pata-rat/. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Desire Foundation. 2014. Roma Socio-Territorial Segregation and Ghettoization. Local Activist Perspectives, 2010–2014. Desire Foundation. Available at https://www.desire-ro.eu/?p=671. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Dohotaru, A., H. Harbula, and E. Vincze. 2016. Pata. Cluj: Editura Fundatiei pentru Studii Europene.
European Roma Rights Centre. 2012. Romania: Bring Roma Back to the City of Cluj-Napoca! December 14. Available at http://www.errc.org/article/romania-bring-roma-back-to-the-city-of-cluj-napoca/4078. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Foucault, M. 1980. The Confession of the Flesh. In Power/Knowledge, ed. C. Gordon, 194–228. New York: Pantheon.
Giurgiu, A. 2010. Primăria evacuează romii de pe strada Coastei şi Cantonului luna aceasta. Cotidianul Transilvan, December 14. Available at http://www.cotidiantr.ro/primaria-evacueaza-romii-de-pe-strada-coastei-si-cantonului-luna-aceasta-46061.php#.V0iRnVIh2AZ. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Graham, S. 2010. Cities Under Siege. London: Verso.
Huysmans, J. 2004. A Foucaultian View on Spill-Over: Freedom and Security in the EU. Journal of International Relations and Development 7 (3): 294–318.
———. 2011. What’s in an Act? On Security Speech Acts and Little Security Nothings. Security Dialogue 42 (4–5): 371–383.
ICCM. 2010. International Collaboratory on Critical Methods in Security: Method 4 “Situated Knowledge”. Blog. Available at http://www.open.ac.uk/researchprojects/iccm/methods/method-4/description.html. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Marcuse, P. 1996. Privatization and Its Discontents. In Cities After Socialism, ed. G. Andrusz, M. Harloe, and I. Szelényi, 119–191. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
McDonald, M. 2008. Securitization and the Construction of Security. European Journal of International Relations 14 (4): 563–587.
Mireanu, M. 2014. Vigilantism and Security: State, Violence and Politics in Italy and Hungary, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Budapest: Central European University.
Păcurar, A. 2010. Locuitorii din Pata Rât au capela si birou de politie. City News, April 22. Available at http://citynews.ro/din-oras-10/locuitorii-din-pata-rat-au-capela-si-birou-de-politie-79590. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Pásztor, G., and L. Péter. 2009. Romanian Housing Problems. Studia Universitatis Babes Bolyay Sociologia LIV (1): 79–100.
Petrovici, N. 2012. Workers and the City. Urban Studies 49 (11): 2377–2397.
Poenaru, F. 2016. The Roma Business 160 Years Since the End of Roma Slavery in Romania. LeftEast, February 26. Available at http://www.criticatac.ro/lefteast/the-roma-business-160-years-since-the-end-of-roma-slavery-in-romania/. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Pop, V. 2015. The Art of Exclusion. The Economist, February 20.
Raţ, C. 2011. Şi ţiganul este aproapele meu? Criticatac. Available at http://www.criticatac.ro/7533/si-tiganul-este-aproapele-meu/. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Roe, P. 2008. Actor, Audience(s) and Emergency Measures. Security Dialogue 39 (6): 615–635.
Romitan, C. 2014. Romii mutaţi de pe Coastei nu vor primi despăgubiri. Transilvania Reporter, October 7. Available at http://transilvaniareporter.ro/actualitate/romii-mutati-de-pe-coastei-nu-vor-primi-despagubiri/. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Smith, N. 1996. The New Urban Frontier. London: Routledge.
———. 2002. New Globalism, New Urbanism. Antipode 34 (3): 427–450.
Stiri de Cluj. 2011a. Pata Rât, cea mai periculoasa zona din Cluj. May 10. Available at http://www.stiridecluj.ro/social/pata-rat-cea-mai-periculoasa-zona-din-cluj-in-zona-au-loc-mai-mult-de-jumatate-din-infractiunile-inregistrate-in-oras. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
———. 2011b. Parc de joaca in locul locuintelor de tigani de pe strada Coastei. August 16. Available at http://www.stiridecluj.ro/social/parc-de-joaca-in-locul-locuintelor-de-tigani-de-pe-strada-coastei-video-si-foto. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
———. 2012. Experiment la Pata Rat! Tiganii care locuiesc pe rampa sunt ca termitele. March 29. Available at http://www.stiridecluj.ro/social/experiment-la-pata-rat-tiganii-care-locuiesc-pe-rampa-sunt-ca-termitele-video. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Stritzel, H. 2011. Security, the Translation. Security Dialogue 42 (4–5): 343–355.
van Baar, H. 2017. Evictability and the Biopolitical Bordering of Europe. Antipode 49 (1): 212–230.
Vincze, E. 2012a. Rampa de gunoi: spațiul marginalității urbane avansate rasializate în România de azi. In Antologia Criticatac, 53–67. Bucuresti: Tact.
———. 2012b. Landfill: Space of Advanced and Racialized Urban Marginality in Today’s Romania. SPAREX. Available at http://sparex-ro.eu/?p=487. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
———. 2015. Glocalization of Neoliberalism in Romania Through the Reform of the State and Entrepreneurial Development. Studia UBB Europaea LX (1): 125–151.
Vincze, E., and S. Ciotlăuș. 2016. Housing and Class (Trans)formation in Romania. LeftEast, September 3. Available at http://www.criticatac.ro/lefteast/housing-and-class-transformation-in-romania/. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Wæver, O. 1995. Securitisation and Desecuritisation. In On Security, ed. R.D. Lipschutz, 46–86. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wacquant, L. 2008. Relocating Gentrification. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (1): 198–205.
Zamfirescu, I. 2015. Housing Eviction, Displacement and the Missing Social Housing of Bucharest. Calitatea Vietii XXVI (2): 140–154.
Ziua de Cluj. 2010. “Cartier” de romi la PataRât. May 10. Available at http://ziuadecj.realitatea.net/administratie/cartier-de-romi-la-pata-rat--5384.html. Accessed 4 Sept 2017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mireanu, M. (2019). Security at the Nexus of Space and Class: Roma and Gentrification in Cluj, Romania. In: van Baar, H., Ivasiuc, A., Kreide, R. (eds) The Securitization of the Roma in Europe. Human Rights Interventions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77035-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77035-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-77034-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-77035-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)