Advertisement

The Temporalities of Energy Transition Processes

  • Olivier LabussièreEmail author
  • Alain Nadaï
Chapter
Part of the Energy, Climate and the Environment book series (ECE)

Abstract

This chapter provides a critical inquiry into the processes of time-making and agreeing upon collective horizons for the energy transition. A broad range of academic literature looks at the energy transition as an interval, a ‘matter of timing’ (historical drivers, pace of the transition), in which distant futures and anticipatory attitudes steer the way in which to bridge a gap. Different from this, this chapter develops a pragmatic framework which approaches the energy transition as a process of change in which new assemblages and new durations are performed. Analysing different case studies in France and Germany, it shows that ‘nearness’ (recent past and near future) has a major influence on the steering of energy transition processes because it is a disputed zone for selecting, renaming entities from different times, and agreeing upon new enduring assemblages.

List of abbreviations

EGL

European Gas Limited

FWLK

Friedrich-Wilhelm-Lübke-Koog

GPS

Global Positioning System

HSW

Husum shipyard

IBA

International Bauausstellung (IBA) Fürst Pückler Land

LMBV

Lausitzer und Mitteldeutsche Bergbauverwalttungsgesellschaft mbH

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out with the financial support of the French National Research Agency (ANR, Programme sociétés innovantes, convention 2011-SOIN-003-01, projet COLLENER).

Bibliography

  1. Adam, Barbara. “History of the Future: Paradoxes and Challenges.” Rethinking History 14, no. 3 (2010): 361–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam, Barbara, and Chris Groves. Future Matters: Action, Knowledge, Ethics. Boston: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, Ben. “Preemption, Precaution, Preparedness: Anticipatory Action and Future Geographies.” Progress in Human Geographies 34, no. 6 (2010): 777–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bidet, Alexandra, Louis Quéré, and Gérôme Truc. “Ce à quoi nous tenons. Dewey et la formation des valeurs.” In La formation des valeurs, edited by John Dewey, translated and presented by Alexandra Bidet, Louis Quéré et Gérôme Truc, 5–64. Paris: Editions La Découverte, 2011.Google Scholar
  5. Chezel, Édith, and Olivier Labussière. “Energy Landscape as a Polity: Wind Power Practices in Northern Friesland (Germany).” Landscape Research (2017): 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1336516.
  6. Colapietro, Vincent. “Time as Experience/Experience as Temporality: Pragmatic and Perfectionist Reflections on Extemporaneous Creativity.” Pragmatism and Creativity 1 (2013): 1–26.Google Scholar
  7. Crosby, Alfred. Children of the Sun: A History of Humanity’s Unappeasable Appetite for Energy. London: W. W. Norton & Company, 2006.Google Scholar
  8. Cutchin, Malcom. “John Dewey’s Metaphysical Ground-Map and Its Implications for Geographical Inquiry.” Geoforum 39 (2008): 1555–1569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Debeir, Jean-Claude, Jean-Paul Deléage, and Daniel Hémery. Une histoire de l’énergie. Paris: Flammarion, 2013 [ed. orig. 1986].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deshaies, Michel. “Processus et enjeux du développement éolien sur la commune de Klettwitz/Shipkau.” Collener Working Paper, LOTERR, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, 2015.Google Scholar
  11. Dewey, John. “Reality as Experience.” The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 3, no. 10 (1906): 253–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dewey, John. Reconstruction in Philosophy. New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dewey, John. The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. London: George Allen, 1930.Google Scholar
  14. Dewey, John. “Theory of Valuation.” International Encyclopedia of Unified Science II, no. 4 (1939): 1–66.Google Scholar
  15. Dewey, John. The Public and Is Problems: An Essay in Political Inquiry. Chicago: Gateway, 1946 [ed. orig. 1927].Google Scholar
  16. Dewey, John. Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone Edition, 1997.Google Scholar
  17. Dewey, John, and Arthur Bentley. Knowing and the Known. Boston: Beacon Press, 1949.Google Scholar
  18. Dewsburry, John-David. “Performativity and the Event: Enacting a Philosophy of Difference.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18 (2000): 473–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doel, Marcus. Poststructuralist Geographies: The Diabolical Art of Spatial Science. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  20. Faubion, James. “On the Anthropology of the Contemporary: Addressing Concepts, Designs, and Practices.” HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6, no. 1 (2016): 371–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Friedrichs, Jörg. The Future Is Not What It Used to Be: Climate Change and Energy Scarcity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  22. Geels, Franck, and Johan Schot. “Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways.” Research Policy 36 (2007): 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Granjou, Céline, Jeremy Walker, and Juan Francisco Salazar. “Politics of Anticipation: On Knowing and Governing Environmental Futures.” Futures 92 (2017): 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grove, Christopher. “Emptying the Future: On the Environmental Politics of Anticipation.” Futures 92 (2017): 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grubler, Arnulf. “Time for a Change: On the Patterns of Diffusion of Innovation.” Daedalus 125, no. 3 (1996): 19–42.Google Scholar
  26. Guyer, Jane. “Prophecy and the Near Future: Thoughts on Macroeconomic, Evangelical, and Punctuated Time.” American Ethnologist 34, no. 3 (2007): 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guyer, Jane. “Anthropology and the Near-Future Concept”. In Handbook of Anticipation, edited by Roberto Poli, 1–17. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar
  28. Hugues, Thomas. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  29. Ingold, T. “When ANT Meets SPIDER: Social Theory for Arthropods.” In Material Agency: Towards a Non-anthropocentric Approach, edited by K. Carl and M. Lambros, 209–215. New York: Springer, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jackson, John Brinckerhoff. A Sense of Place, a Sense of Time. New Heaven: Yale University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  31. Jameson, Frederic. A Singular Modernity: Essay on the Ontology of the Present. London: Verso, 2002.Google Scholar
  32. Koopman, Colin. “Pragmatism as a Philosophy of Hope: Emerson, James, Dewey, Rorty.” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 20, no. 2 (2006): 106–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Labussière, Olivier. “Concentrer une ressource diffuse. Enjeux sociotechniques et politiques de l’exploration du gaz de charbon dans le basin houille de Lorraine.” In Le projet d’exploitation du gaz de charbon en Lorraine et son integration dans le territoire, edited by Yann Gunzburger, 55–76. Paris: CNRS Editions, 2017.Google Scholar
  34. Labussière, Olivier, and Alain Nadaï. “Unexpected Wind Power ‘Potentials’: The Art of Planning with Inherited Socio-geographical Configurations (France).” Scottish Geographical Journal 130, no. 3 (2014): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Laschs, John. “The Past, the Future and the Immediate.” Transactions of the Charles S: Peirce Society 39, no. 2 (2003): 151–162.Google Scholar
  36. Lintz, Gerd, Peter Wirth, and Jörn Harfst. “Regional Structural Change and Resilience: From Lignite Mining to Tourism in the Lusatian Lakeland.” Raumforsch Raumordn 70 (2012): 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lowenthal, David. The Past Is a Foreign Country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015 [origin. 1985].Google Scholar
  38. Mead, Andrew. “One Option Was to Do Nothing—To Leave the Landscape to Its Own Devices as a Wilderness.” Architects Journal 27 (2005): 26–31.Google Scholar
  39. Melosi, Martin. “Energy Transitions in Historical Perspective.” In Energy and Culture: Perspectives on the Power to Work. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 2006.Google Scholar
  40. Nora, Pierre. “Entre mémoire et histoire. La problématique des lieux.” In Les lieux de mémoire, tome I, Pierre Nora (dir.), 23–43, 1997.Google Scholar
  41. Nye, David. Consuming Power: A Social History of American Energies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  42. Poli, Roberto. Handbook of Anticipation: Theoretical and Applied Aspects of the Use of Future in Decision Making. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rabinow, Paul. Making Time: On the Anthropology of the Contemporary. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
  44. Santos, Milton. La nature de l’espace. Technique et temps, raison et emotion. Paris: L’Harmattan, 1997.Google Scholar
  45. Smil, Vaclav. Energy in World History. Boulder: Westview Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  46. Smil, Vaclav. Energy Transitions: History, Requirements, Prospects. Santa Barbara: Praeger, 2010.Google Scholar
  47. Sovacool, Benjamin. “How Long Will It Take? Conceptualizing the Temporal Dynamics of Energy Transitions.” Energy Research & Social Science 13 (2016): 202–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thrift, Nigel. “Afterwords.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 18 (2000): 213–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wrigley, Tony. Energy and the English Industrial Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pacte Social Sciences Research Centre, UGA, CNRS, Science Po GrenobleGrenoble INPGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.Centre International de Recherche sur l’Environnement et le Développement, CIRED-CNRSNogent-sur-MarneFrance

Personalised recommendations