Skip to main content

Interaction of Martensitic Microstructures in Adjacent Grains

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Proceedings of the International Conference on Martensitic Transformations: Chicago

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

Abstract

It is often observed that martensitic microstructures in adjacent polycrystal grains are related. For example, micrographs of Arlt (J Mat Sci 22:2655–2666, 1990) [1] (one reproduced in (Bhattacharya, Microstructure of martensite, 2003) [10, p 225]) exhibit propagation of layered structures across grain boundaries in the cubic-to-tetragonal phase transformation in \( {\text{BaTiO}}_{3} \). Such observations are related to requirements of compatibility of the deformation at the grain boundary. Using a generalization of the Hadamard jump condition, this is explored in the nonlinear elasticity model of martensitic transformations for the case of a bicrystal with suitably oriented columnar geometry, in which the microstructure in both grains is assumed to involve just two martensitic variants, with a planar or non-planar interface between the grains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The general form of the transformation stretch for an orthorhombic to monoclinic transformation is given in [8, Theorem 2.10(4)]. In general one can make a linear transformation of variables in the reference configuration which turns the corresponding energy wells into the form (1). However, in [4, Sect. 4.1] and the announcement of the results of the present paper in [5] it was incorrectly implied that the analysis based on K as in (1) applies to a general orthorhombic to monoclinic transformation. This is not the case because the linear transformation in the reference configuration changes the deformation gradient corresponding to austenite in [4] and to the rotated grain in the present paper. A more general, but feasible, analysis would be needed to cover the case of general orthorhombic to monoclinic transformations.

  2. 2.

    For an explanation of gradient Young measures and how they can be used to represent possibly infinitely fine microstructures see, for example, [2].

  3. 3.

    This extra condition, typically satisfied in practice, was accidentally omitted in the announcement in [5].

References

  1. Arlt G (1990) Twinning in ferroelectric and ferroelastic ceramics: stress relief. J Mat Sci 22:2655–2666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ball JM (2004) Mathematical models of martensitic microstructure. Mater Sci Eng A 78(1–2):61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ball JM, Carstensen C Hadamard’s compatibility condition for microstructures (In preparation)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ball JM, Carstensen C (1999) Compatibility conditions for microstructures and the austenite-martensite transition. Mater Sci Eng A 273–275:231–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ball JM, Carstensen C (2015) Geometry of polycrystals and microstructure. MATEC Web Conf 33:02007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ball JM, James RD (1987) Fine phase mixtures as minimizers of energy. Arch Ration Mech Anal 100:13–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ball JM, James RD (1991) A characterization of plane strain. Proc Roy Soc London A 432:93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ball JM, James RD (1992) Proposed experimental tests of a theory of fine microstructure, and the two-well problem. Phil Trans Roy Soc London A 338:389–450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhattacharya K (1992) Self-accommodation in martensite. Arch Ration Mech Anal 120:201–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhattacharya K (2003) Microstructure of martensite, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bhattacharya K, Kohn RV (1997) Elastic energy minimization and the recoverable strain of polycrystalline shape-memory materials. Arch Ration Mech Anal 139:99–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khachaturyan AG (1983) Theory of structural transformations in solids, Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mardare S Personal communication

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research of JMB was supported by the EU (TMR contract FMRX - CT EU98-0229 and ERBSCI**CT000670), by EPSRC (GRlJ03466, EP/E035027/1, and EP/J014494/1), the ERC under the EU’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) / ERC grant agreement no 291053 and by a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Ball .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ball, J.M., Carstensen, C. (2018). Interaction of Martensitic Microstructures in Adjacent Grains. In: Stebner, A., Olson, G. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Martensitic Transformations: Chicago. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76968-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics