Advertisement

An Experience of Participatory Construction of Solid Waste Management and Environmental Education Indicators on a University Campus

  • Antonio Carlos MergerJr.Email author
  • Daniela Cássia Sudan
  • Evandro Watanabe
Chapter
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

The increase in the production of solid waste is related to serious impacts on climate change of the planet owing to emission of greenhouse gases, such as methane (CH4). Therefore, indicators, which are tools developed to evaluate and maintain control over a process of interest, can be used to measure how relevant these impacts are or can be. There are many initiatives, results and challenges in the solid waste management and environmental education areas in high education institutions, but there are just a few studies about structured indicators that were implemented in a systematic way. Considering these facts, this study aims to contribute to the topic of indicators, focusing in domestic solid waste. To do so, we will present: a research of scientific productions about this topic, at international and national levels; domestic solid waste management and environmental education indicators under development on the University of São Paulo’s campus in Ribeirão Preto city. The adoption of indicators is relevant to broaden the possibilities for evaluation and reflection on the impacts of what is implemented in the high education institution, reverberating in the improvement and enhancement of actions and results to achieve the sustainability in universities.

Keywords

Indicators Solid waste management Environmental education University 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the representatives who have been willing to help us in developing this important mechanism for the development of the indicators project.

References

  1. Battistelle, R. A. G., Martiniano, T. C. F., & Araújo, A. T. (2011). Diagnóstico da situação dos resíduos sólidos da Universidade Estadual “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” (UNESP), campus de Bauru, utilizando o princípio da produção mais limpa (P+L). In P. C. S. Leme, et al. (Eds.), Visões e experiências ibero-americanas de sustentabilidade nas universidades (pp. 311–318). São Carlos-SP: 3rd International Seminar on Sustainability at the University.Google Scholar
  2. Besen, G. R., & Ribeiro, H. (2006). Indicadores de sustentabilidade para programa municipais de coleta seletiva – métodos e técnicas de avaliação, pp. 159–174.Google Scholar
  3. Brandão, C. H., & Borges, M. C. (2007). A pesquisa participante: um momento da educação popular. UFU-MG: Popular Education Journal, 6, 51–62.Google Scholar
  4. Brasil. (2010). Law n. 12.305, August 2nd, 2010. National Solid Waste Policy. Brasília: Chamber of Deputies, 1. ed., 73p.Google Scholar
  5. CNTL – SENAI (2003). Implementação de Programas de Produção mais Limpa. Porto Alegre, Centro Nacional de Tecnologias Limpas SENAI-RS/ UNIDO/INEP, 42p.Google Scholar
  6. de Souza Minayo, M. C. (2009). Construção de indicadores qualitativos para avaliação de mudanças. Rio de Janeiro: Brazilian Journal of Medical Education, 33, 83–91.Google Scholar
  7. Hammond, A., et al. (1995). Introduction. In A. Hammond, et al. (Eds.) (1997), Environmental indicators: A systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development (pp. 1–2). World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  8. IBAM – Brazilian institute of municipal administration. (2001). Manual de gerenciamento integrado de resíduos sólidos. Rio de Janeiro: IBAM. 33p. http://www.resol.com.br/cartilha4/manual.pdf. Last Accessed 2/23/2017.
  9. IPEA – Institute for Applied Economic Research. (2012). Diagnóstico dos Resíduos Sólidos Urbanos. Brasília. p. 46.Google Scholar
  10. Jacobi, P. R. (2007). Educar na sociedade de risco: o desafio de construir alternativas. Environmental Education Research, 2(2), 49–65.Google Scholar
  11. Marans, R. W., & Callewaert, J. (2017). Evaluating sustainability initiatives on university campuses: A case study from the University of Michigan’s sustainability cultural indicators program. In W. L. Filho, et al. (Eds.), Handbook of theory and practice of sustainable development in higher education (Vol. 2, pp. 189–200). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. National Health Foundation of Brazil. (2016). “Gestão da coleta seletiva e de organizações de catadores: indicadores e índices de sustentabilidade”. University of São Paulo; Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing, contributors G. R. Besen, et al. – São Paulo: School of Public Health/USP, 2016. 57p.Google Scholar
  13. Padilha, V. (2016). Desejar, comprar e descartar: da persuasão publicitária à obsolescência programada. Science and Culture Journal, 68(4), 46–49.Google Scholar
  14. Philippi Jr., A., et al. (2005). Indicadores de desenvolvimento sustentável: um estudo de caso da estância turística de Ribeirão Pires. In International Congress on Planning and Environmental Management. Brasília: Catholic University of Brasília.Google Scholar
  15. Sudan, D. (2013). Programa USP Recicla. In D. Sudan, et al. (Eds.), Da Pá Virada: Revirando o tema lixo (2nd ed., pp. 13–18). São Paulo – SP: University of São Paulo. USP Recicla Program/Superintendency of Environmental Management.Google Scholar
  16. The World Bank. (2012). What a waste: A global review of solid waste management. The World Bank, n. 15, 98p.Google Scholar
  17. Tonso, S. (2011). A ambientalização da universidade e a extensão universitária. In P. C. S. Leme, et al. (Eds.), Visões e experiências ibero-americanas de sustentabilidade nas universidades (pp. 65–70). São Carlos-SP: 3rd International Seminar on Sustainability at the University.Google Scholar
  18. Universitas Indonesia. (2016). UI GreenMetric Ranking: University of California Davis—The World’s Best Green Campus. Indonesia. http://greenmetric.ui.ac.id/ranking-by-subject-waste-2016/. Last Accessed 4/10/2017.
  19. University of São Paulo. (2011). Rector’s office ordinance n. GR5438/21122011. Renews the institutionality of the USP Recicla Program.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Carlos MergerJr.
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniela Cássia Sudan
    • 1
  • Evandro Watanabe
    • 2
  1. 1.Environmental ManagementUniversity of São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil
  2. 2.School of Dentistry of Ribeirão PretoUniversity of São PauloRibeirão PretoBrazil

Personalised recommendations