Advertisement

Sustainable Campus in Brazilian Scenario: Case Study of the Federal University of Lavras

  • Cristiane Criscibene Pantaleão
  • Tatiana Tucunduva Philippi CorteseEmail author
Chapter
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)

Abstract

The initiatives related to the application of sustainability in the university campus stand out internationally and focus on Europe and the USA. In Brazil there are few campuses that can be considered sustainable. The purpose of this chapter is to present actions that classified the Federal University of Lavras (UFLA) as the High Education Institution (HEI) with the most sustainable campus of the Brazilian scenario according to the UI GreenMetric World University Ranking (UI GreenMetric). This ranking was created with the purpose of classifying the HEIs globally and evaluates the campuses through 6 categories. The methodology used was qualitative analysis with a research strategy through the case study. The case analyzed in this study can be characterized as a Living Lab for Sustainability, due to the participation of the academic community in the operation of practices and interaction with the external community. This work seeks to contribute in a global way, providing an academic debate on the insertion of sustainability in the university campus, besides presenting data that can serve as reference to other HEIs who wish to follow the same path in the design or adaptation of their campuses and can contribute to the transformation of individuals, societies and cities through education.

Keywords

Sustainable campus Living lab Brazilian scenario Ranking UI GreenMetric 

References

  1. AASHE (2014). STARS sustainability tracking, assessment and rating system Version 2.0 Technical Manual (p. 350). Association for the Advancement of Sustainability in Higher Education.Google Scholar
  2. Almeida, F. C. (2015). O papel das instituições de educação superior na gestão voltada para a sustentabilidade: uma análise da Universidade Federal do Tocantins a partir do plano de gestão de logística sustentável. Dissertação de mestrado. Palmas, TO, Brasil: Universidade Federal do Tocantins.Google Scholar
  3. Catalão, V. M. L., Layrargues, P. P., & Zaneti, I. (2011). Universidade para o século XXI: educação e gestão ambiental na Universidade de Brasília (Cap. 3, pp. 153–208). Brasília: Cidade Gráfica e Editora.Google Scholar
  4. de Souza, A. P., & Guimarães, M. (2008). Redes como ambiente educativo para a educação ambiental. Educação ambiental, 113.Google Scholar
  5. Ferreira, M. L., de Oliveira, A., Cortese, T. T. P., Kniess, C. T., Quaresma, C. C., & Paschoalin Filho, J. A. (2015). Cidades Inteligentes e Sustentáveis: Problemas e Desafios (Cap. 5, pp. 81–111). São Paulo: Anap.Google Scholar
  6. Gil, A. C. (2009). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa (4th ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.Google Scholar
  7. Groenewald, D., & Powell, J. (2016). Relationship between sustainable development initiatives and improved company financial performance: A South African perspective: original research. Acta Commercii, 16(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. König, A. (2013). What might a sustainable university look like? Challenges and opportunities in the development of the University of Luxembourg and its new campus. In A. König (Ed.), Regenerative sustainable development of universities and cities: Role of living laboratories (pp. 143–172). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  9. Leal Filho, W. (2011). About the role of universities and their contribution to sustainable development. Higher Education Policy, 24(4), 427–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Machado, R. E., Fracasso, E. M., Tometich, P., & Nascimento, L. F. (2013). Práticas de Gestão Ambiental em Universidades Brasileiras. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 7(3), 37.Google Scholar
  11. Martins, G. D. A., & Theóphilo, C. R. (2009). Metodologia da investigação científica. São Paulo: Editora Atlas.Google Scholar
  12. Parrado Castañeda, Á. M., & Trujillo Quintero, H. F. (2015). Universidad y sostenibilidad: una aproximación teórica para su implementación. AD-minister, 26, 149–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Reza, M. I. H. (2016). Sustainability in higher education: perspectives of malaysian higher education system. SAGE Open, 6(3), 2158244016665890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Schliwa, G. (2013). Exploring living labs through transition management-challenges and opportunities for sustainable urban transitions. Dissertação de Mestrado. Lund, Suécia: Lund University, Lund.Google Scholar
  15. Tauchen, J., & Brandli, L. L. (2006). A gestão ambiental em instituições de ensino superior: modelo para implantação em campus universitário. Gestão & Produção, 13(3), 503–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Termignoni, L. D. F. (2012). Framework de sustentabilidade para instituições de ensino superior comunitárias. Dissertação de mestrado. Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul.Google Scholar
  17. Tilbury, D. (2011). Higher education for sustainability: A global overview of commitment and progress. Higher Education in the World, 4, 18–28.Google Scholar
  18. Too, L., & Bajracharya, B. (2015). Sustainable campus: Engaging the community in sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(1), 57–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. UI GreenMetric. (2016). Overall ranking 2015. UI GreenMetric World University Ranking on Sustainability. http://greenmetric.ui.ac.id/overall-ranking-2016/. Last Accessed 5 February 2016.
  20. UFLA. (2016). Diretoria de Meio Ambiente. Universidade Federal de Lavras. http://www.dma.ufla.br/site. Last Accessed 15 October 2016.
  21. UFLA. (2017a). Departamento de Direito, Universidade Federal de Lavras. http://www.dir.ufla.br/index.php/infraestrutura/. Last Accessed 10 March 2017.
  22. UFLA. (2017b). Coordenadoria de Vigilância ao Patrimônio. Universidade Federal de Lavras. http://www.vigilancia.ufla.br/site/institucional/missao-visao-e-valores/. Last Accessed 10 March 2016.
  23. USP. (2014). Programa campus sustentável USP. Universidade de São Paulo. http://slideplayer.com.br/slide/4087021/. Last Accessed 13 June 2017.
  24. Veeckman, C., Schuurman, D., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2013). Linking living lab characteristics and their outcomes: Towards a conceptual framework. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3(12), 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Voytenko, Y., McCormick, K., Evans, J., & Schliwa, G. (2016). Urban living labs for sustainability and low carbon cities in Europe: Towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123, 45–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yin, R. (2015). Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. Porto Alegre: Bookmann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristiane Criscibene Pantaleão
    • 1
  • Tatiana Tucunduva Philippi Cortese
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Graduate Program in Sustainable and Smart CitiesUniversity Nove de JulhoBarra Funda, São PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Graduate Program in Sustainable and Smart CitiesRua Deputado Salvador JulianelliBarra Funda, São PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations