Abstract
One of the keys to promote sustainability in a university is the establishment of a solid planning instrument. The Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio), which had already built a pact for sustainability on its campus in 2009, is now reviewing its directives in order to add innovative social and environmental concepts, as well as new topics to the agenda. This paper presents the strategy and methodology being used by PUC-Rio to build its socio-environmental agenda with the participation of its entire community. The agenda is based on the principle of community cooperation and having the campus as an example of sound sustainable practices. Interdisciplinary working groups designed the new agenda on principles, diagnoses, guidelines, goals, projects, indicators and monitoring strategies for 6 distinct topics: water; biodiversity; energy; waste; constructed and living spaces; mobility; as well as 5 crossing topics—education, health, communication, information technology and resilience to climate change. The revised agenda intends to strengthen socio-environmental agreements between academia and society, as well as reinforce rules to use the campus as a model of sustainability practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amui, L. B., Jabbour, C. J., de Jabbour, A. B. L., & Kannan, D. (2017). Sustainability as a dynamic organizational capability: A systematic review and a future agenda toward a sustainable transition. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 308–322.
Beynaghi, A., Trencher, G., Moztarzadeh, F., Mozafari, M., Maknoon, R., & Leal Filho, W. (2016). Future sustainability scenarios for universities: Moving beyond the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 3464–3478.
Biermanna, F., Kanieb, N., & Kima, R. (2017, June). Global governance by goal-setting: The novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 6–31.
Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2013). Transdisciplinary sustainability science at higher education institutions: Science policy tools for incremental institutional change. Sustainability, 5, 3783–3801.
Francisco, P. (2015). Carta Encíclica, Laudato Si’ do Santo Padre Francisco sobre o cuidado da casa comum. Vatican. Rome. 187p. Available at: http://w2.vatican.va/content/dam/francesco/pdf/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si_po.pdf. Accessed in May 30, 2017.
Geiser, R. (2016). Laudato Si’ e a sustentabilidade: algumas reflexões. Revista Relicário. Uberlândia, 3(5), 14–33.
Hardin, R., Bhargava, A., Bothner, C., Browne, K., Kusano, S., Golrokhian, A., et al. (2016). Towards a revolution in sustainability education: Vision, architecture, and assessment in a case-based approach. World Development Perspectives, 1, 58–63.
IBGE. (2017). Conheça Cidades e Estados do Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Available at: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br. Accessed in May 12, 2017.
Janssen, W., & Goldsworthy, P. (1996, July). Multidisciplinary research for natural resource management: Conceptual and practical implications. Agricultural Systems, 51(3), 259–279.
Leal Filho, W., Shiel, C., & Paço, A. (2015). Integrative approaches to environmental sustainability at universities: An overview of challenges and priorities. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 12(1), 1–14.
Marcomim, F. E., & Silva, A. D. V. (2009). A sustentabilidade no ensino superior brasileiro: alguns elementos a partir da prática de educação ambiental na Universidade. Contrapontos, 9(2), 104–117.
NIMA. (2009). Agenda Ambiental PUC-Rio. Rio de Janeiro. 32p. Available at: http://www.nima.puc-rio.br/noticias/agenda_ambiental.pdf. Accessed in May 30, 2017.
NIMA. (2016). Revisão da Agenda Socioambiental. Available at: http://www.nima.puc-rio.br/noticias/agenda_ambiental.pdf. Accessed in May 30, 2017.
Orenstein, D. E., & Shach-Pinsley, D. (2017). A comparative framework for assessing sustainability initiatives at the regional scale. word development. In Press. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X16300833. Accessed in May 30, 2017.
Parenteau, R. (1994). Local action plans for sustainable communities. Environment and Urbanization, 6(2), 183–199.
Peter, C. J., Libunao, W. H., & Abdul Latif, A. (2016, June). Extent of education for sustainable development (ESD) integration in Malaysian community colleges. Journal of Technical education and Training, 8(1), 1–13.
PUC-Rio. (2016). PUC-Rio in Numbers 2016. Available at: http://www.puc-rio.br/english/aboutpuc/numbers.html. Accessed in May 21, 2017.
Satterthwait, D. (2013). The political underpinnings of cities’ accumulated resilience to climate change. Environment & Urbanization, 25(2), 381–391.
Schneide, F., Martinez-Alier, J., & Kallis, G. (2010). Crisis or opportunity? Economic degrowth for social equity and ecological sustainability. Introduction to this special issue. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(6), 511–518.
Siqueira, J. C. de (2016). Laudato Si’: um presente para o planeta. Rio de Janeiro: Editora PUC-Rio, pp. 50–54.
Tiyarattanachai, R., & Hollmann, N. (2016). Green Campus initiative and its impacts on quality of life of stakeholders in Green and Non-Green Campus universities. SpringerPlus, 5(1), 2016.
Too, L., & Bajracharya, B. (2013). Sustainable campus: Engaging the community in sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 16(1), 57–71.
Vasconcelos, L., & Silva, F. (2015). Sustainability in the 21st century: The power of dialogue. Lisboa: Livraria Escola Editora.
Velazquez, L., Mungiua, N., Platt, A., & Taddei, J. (2006). Sustainable university? What can be the matter? Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 810–819.
Weerts, D., & Sandmann, L. (2010). Community engagement and boundary-spanning roles at research universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(6), 632–657.
Zdanyte, K., & Bronius Neverauskas, B. (2014). Ensuring of sustainable development for contemporary organizations development. Economic and Management, 19(1), 120–128.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lemos, M.F.C., Rego, L.F.G., Antunes, M.C., Lopes, R.A., de Abreu, T.C.C. (2018). Socio-environmental Agenda: A Planning Instrument to Improve Sustainable Development in University Campi. In: Leal Filho, W., Frankenberger, F., Iglecias, P., Mülfarth, R. (eds) Towards Green Campus Operations. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76885-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76885-4_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76884-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76885-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)