Space, Like Time, Is Money: Evaluating Space Utilisation in Saudi Arabian Universities

  • Naif AlghamdiEmail author
Part of the World Sustainability Series book series (WSUSE)


The demand for tertiary education in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has been increasing. As a result, the Kingdom is expanding its higher education sector, through which twenty public universities were established. The establishment of these institutions has led to the building of campuses in order to provide enough space for teaching, learning, training, and research. However, the United Nations long-term projections of the Kingdom forecast that there will be a sharp decline in the youth population. The consequences of these projections pose a problem to long-term strategic planning for space at university campuses. To ensure a match between supply and demand for space, this paper investigates the provision and utilisation of space in Saudi Arabian university campuses. Operating the physical plant sustainably by identifying and eliminating underutilised space not only saves energy and funds, but also improves the student and staff satisfaction by creating a good balance between space needs and space provision. The ultimate aim of this paper is to highlight how space use is measured, what the utilisation rate of existing premises is, and how space can be effectively and efficiently operated. Data was collected through two instruments: the first and predominant instrument was the examination of the space utilisation of five college buildings in five different universities; four buildings were from recently founded universities, while one building was from a well-established university. The second instrument employed was a questionnaire in which one thousand two hundred and ninety users including students, faculty members, and supporting staff were asked about their experience of space use. Findings show that almost all spaces in college buildings, in both new and old institutions, were not utilised as they should be. The paper ends with some recommendations to improve space planning and to optimise space use.


Space utilisation University campus Space planning Facility management Saudi Arabia 



The author would like to thank Professor Hans de Jonge, Dr Alexandra den Heijer, and Bart Valks—from the Department of Management in the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands—for their input in developing this research.


  1. AAPPA—Australian Association of Higher Education Facilities Officers. (2002). Space planning guidelines, ed. 2. Last Accessed February 12, 2017.
  2. Abdullah, S., Mohd Ali, H., Sipana, I., Awangb, M., Abdul Rahmanb, M., Shikab, S., et al. (2012a). Classroom management: Measuring space usage, international congress on interdisciplinary business and social science. Procedia—Social and Behavioural Sciences, 65, 931–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abdullah, S., Mohd Ali, H., & Sipan, I. (2012b). Benchmarking space usage in higher education institutes: Attaining efficient use. Journal of Techno-Social, 4(1), 11–20.Google Scholar
  4. Christensen, K., Melfi, R., Nordman, B., Rosenblum, B., & Viera, R. (2014). Using existing network infrastructure to estimate building occupancy and control plugged-in devices in user workspaces. International Journal of Communication Networks and Distributed Systems, 12(1), 4–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Jonge, H., Arkesteijn, M. H., Den Heijer, A. C., Vande Putte, H. J. M., De Vries, J. C., & Van der Zwart, J. (2009). Corporate real estate management: Designing a real estate strategy. Delft, Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.Google Scholar
  6. Dodier, R. H., Henze, G. P., Tiller, D. K., & Guo, X. (2006). Building occupancy detection through sensor belief networks. Energy and Buildings, 38(9), 1033–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Erickson, V. L., & Cerpa, A. E. (2010). Occupancy based demand response HVAC control strategy. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Building (pp. 7–10)Google Scholar
  8. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garg, V., & Bansal, N. K. (2000). Smart occupancy sensors to reduce energy consumption. Energy and Buildings, 32(1), 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harle, R., & Hopper, A. (2008). The potential for location-aware power management. In Proceedings of UbiComp (pp. 302–311).Google Scholar
  11. HEFCE—Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2000). Estate strategies: A guide to good practice 00/04. Last Accessed February 12, 2017.
  12. IHED—Inside Higher Ed. (2015). No choice but to close? Last Accessed February 5, 2017.
  13. Kasim, R., Md Nor, H., & Masirin, M. I. M. (2012). Assessing space utilisation for teaching and learning facilities at the higher education institution: A case study of G3 building, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(5), 125–134.Google Scholar
  14. Kenny, C. (1977). The use of space and facilities in universities and polytechnics in the United Kingdom. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Publications, Paris.Google Scholar
  15. Knapp, C., Vickroy, K., De Bruyn, L., & Kwong, D. (2009). Are the myths of space utilization costing you more than you know? Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 11(4), 237–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lagunzad, J. (1990). Measuring the utilisation of facilities in TAFE: Report of the Facilities Utilisation Measurement (FACUM) Project. Department of Technical and Further Education, Planning Division (TAFE National Centre for Research and Development), New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
  17. Melfi, R., Rosenblum, B., Nordman, B., & Christensen, K. (2011). Measuring building occupancy using existing network infrastructure. In Proceedings of the International Green Computing Conference (IGCC 2011) (pp. 162–169).Google Scholar
  18. Ministry of Education. (2011). The horizon: The strategic plan for higher education in Saudi Arabia. Last Accessed February 10, 2017.
  19. Ministry of Education. (2015). Higher education statistics. Last Accessed February 6, 2017.
  20. NAO—National Audit Office UK. (1996). Space management in higher education: A good practice guide. Last Accessed February 10, 2017.
  21. Russell, J. D., & Doi, J. I. (1957). Manual for studies of space utilization in colleges and universities (p. 130). Athens (OH): American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers.Google Scholar
  22. Shabha, G. (2004). An assessment of the effectiveness of e-learning on university space planning and design. Facilities, 22(3/4), 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharma, R. (1982). Academic staff and space allocation models for Australian CAEs. Melbourne: Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  24. Sharma, R. (1991). Space planning and utilisation in tertiary education. In Proceedings of the Conference of the Australasian Association for Institutional Research (AAIR) (2nd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, October 1–3, 1991). Last Accessed February 10, 2017.
  25. SMG—Space Management Group UK. (2006). Space utilisation: Practice, performance, and guidelines. Last Accessed February 10, 2017.
  26. Smith, L., & Aboummoh, A. (2013). Higher education in Saudi Arabia: Achievements, challenges and opportunities (p. 190). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tjomsland, A. (1959). Manual for studies of space utilization in colleges and Universities by John Dale Russell and James I. The Journal of Higher Education, 30(5), 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. TJTN—The Japan Times News. (2016). Japan’s public and private universities face major shake-ups and mergers as student numbers fall. Last Accessed February 11, 2017.
  29. UGC—University Grants Committee. (1987). University Building Projects—Notes on Control and Guidance. Last Accessed February 13, 2017.
  30. United Nations. (2015). World population prospects. Last Accessed February 10, 2017.
  31. UWN—University World News. (2015). Government to close two in every five universities. Last Accessed February 12, 2017.
  32. Valks, B., Arkesteijn, M., Den Heijer, A., & Putte, H. V. (2016). Smart campus tools. Delft, Netherlands: Delft University of Technology. Unpublished Report. Last Accessed February 15, 2017.
  33. Von Neida, B., Manicria, D., & Tweed, A. (2001). An analysis of the energy and cost savings potential of occupancy sensors for commercial lighting systems. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, 30(2), 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Williams, B., & Harris, R. (1988). Optimising space use. Facilities, 6(5), 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Williams, B., & Worthington, J. (1986). The premises audit—Space use. Facilities, 4(2), 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Den Heijer, A. C. (2011). Managing the university campus: Information to support real estate decisions. Delft, Netherlands: Eburon Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
  2. Dober, R. (1963). Campus planning. Ann Arbor, U.S.A.: Society for College and University Planning (SCUP).Google Scholar
  3. SMG—Space Management Group UK. (2006). Managing space: A review of English further education and HE overseas. Available from: Accessed February 10, 2017.
  4. SMG—Space Management Group UK. (2006). Review of space norms. Available from: Accessed February 11, 2017.
  5. TEFMA—Tertiary Education Management Association. (2009). Space planning guidelines, ed. 3. Available from: Accessed February 12, 2017.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architecture and Building SciencesCollege of Architecture and Planning, King Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations