Abstract
Both feed-in tariffs (FITs) and capital subsidies have been widely employed to promote the adoption of renewable energy technologies. This chapter sheds light on the combined use of FITs and capital subsidies. The purpose is to clarify their optimal combinations to encourage households to adopt photovoltaic (PV) systems or to encourage firms to invest in PV generation. This study develops a microeconomic model embodying the idea of two-part tariffs. The most important findings concern the combination that maximizes social welfare for the residential sector: if FITs are applied to the total PV electricity generated, they should be set at the avoided cost per unit of PV electricity, and capital subsidies should be used to control the number of adopters; whereas, if FITs are applied to only surplus PV electricity, the previous principle is distorted to some extent. A similar result is obtained for the business sector. In the model for the business sector, the government aims to have a certain installed capacity of PV panels, whereas in the model for the residential sector, its aim is to have a certain number of households adopt PV systems. The problem of equity, that is, how to finance the cost of FITs and capital subsidies is also discussed.
Modified, with permission of Elesevier, from Yamamoto, Y., Feed-in tariffs combined with capital subsidies for promoting the adoption of residential photovoltaic systems, Energy Policy, 111, 312–320, Elsevier, 2017. I would like to thank Elsevier.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cerdá E, del RÃo P (2015) Different interpretations of the cost-effectiveness of renewable electricity support: some analytical results. Energy 90:286–298
del RÃo P, Cerdá E (2014) The policy implications of the different interpretations of the cost-effectiveness of renewable electricity support. Energy Policy 64:364–372
del RÃo P, Mir-Artigues P (2014) Combinations of support instruments for renewable electricity in Europe: A review. Ren Sustain Energy Rev 40:287–295
Dusonchet L, Telaretti E (2010) Economic analysis of different supporting policies for the production of electrical energy by solar photovoltaics in western European Union countries. Energy Policy 38:3297–3308
Hirvonen J, Kayo G, Cao S, Hasan A, Sirén K (2015) Renewable energy production support schemes for residential-scale solar photovoltaic systems in Nordic conditions. Energy Policy 79:72–86
Hsu C-W (2011) Using a system dynamics model to assess the effects of capital subsidies and feed-in tariffs on solar PV installations. Appli Energy 100:205–217
Klein A (2008) Feed-in tariff designs: options to support electricity generation from renewable energy sources. VDM Verlag Dr, Müller, Saarbrücken
Lesser JA, Su X (2008) Design of an economically efficient feed-in tariff structure for renewable energy development. Energy Policy 36:981–990
Mayr D, Schmidt J, Schmid E (2014) The potentials of a reverse auction in allocating subsidies for cost-effective roof-top photovoltaic system deployment. Energy Policy 69:555–565
METI (2013) The report on the diffusion of PV systems in Japan. www.meti.go.jp/meti_lib/report/2013fy/E002502.pdf. Accessed 6 Jul 2017 (In Japanese)
Mir-Artigues P, del RÃo P (2014) Combining tariffs, investment subsidies and soft loans in a renewable electricity deployment policy. Energy Policy 69:430–442
Mir-Artigues P, del RÃo P (2016) The economics and policy of solar photovoltaic generation. Springer, Cham
Oi WY (1971) A Disneyland dilemma: two-part tariffs for a Mickey Mouse monopoly. Q J Econ 85:77–96
Oliva S, MacGill I, Passey R (2014) Estimating the net societal value of distributed household PV systems. Sol Energy 100:9–22
Pirnia M, Nathwani J, Fuller D (2011) Ontario feed-in tariffs: system planning implications and impacts on social welfare. Electr J 24:18–28
Yamamoto Y (2012) Pricing electricity from residential photovoltaic systems: a comparison of feed-in tariffs, net metering, and net purchase and sale. Sol Energy 86:2678–2685
Zhao Y, Tang KK, Wang L (2013) Do renewable electricity policies promote renewable electricity generation? Evidence from panel data. Energy Policy 62:887–897
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 1: Proof of the Lemma for the Social Welfare Maximization Problem
Appendix 1: Proof of the Lemma for the Social Welfare Maximization Problem
First, let us verify that for a given p, \(\sum\nolimits_{{i \in\Theta _{p,c,g(p,c)} }} {\left[ {c(x_{i} + y_{i} ) - I_{i} } \right]}\) is maximized at p = c. The same reasoning may be applied here as in Sect. 5.4.3 (see also Fig. 5.2b). Suppose that the marginal household changes from i to j when p increases to p 1, subject to r = c. Then, \(\sum\nolimits_{{i \in\Theta _{p,c,g(p,c)} }} {\left[ {c(x_{i} + y_{i} ) - I_{i} } \right]}\) changes if and only if the marginal household’s surplus PV electricity increases, i.e., \(x_{i} < y_{j}\). Otherwise, the set \(\Theta _{p,c,g(p,c)}\) of adopters remains the same, and the sum does not change. Plugging p = c into \(s = - px_{i} - cy_{i} + I_{i}\) from Eq. (5.5) yields \(- cx_{i} - cy_{i} + I_{i} > - cx_{j} - cy_{j} + I_{j}\), or \(c(x_{i} + y_{i} ) - I_{i} < c(x_{i} + y_{i} ) - I_{j}\) if \(p_{1} < c\) and that \(- cx_{i} - cy_{i} + I_{i} < - cx_{j} - cy_{j} + I_{j}\), or \(c(x_{i} + y_{i} ) - I_{i} > c(x_{j} + y_{j} ) - I_{j}\) if \(p_{1} > c\). Because the adopters, other than the marginal households i or j, are the same, \(\sum\nolimits_{{i \in\Theta _{p,c,g(p,c)} }} {\left[ {c(x_{i} + y_{i} ) - I_{i} } \right]}\) is maximized at p = c.
Next, let us verify the second half of the lemma. Plugging p = 0 into \(s = - px_{i} - cy_{i} + I_{i}\) and \(s = - px_{j} - cy_{j} + I_{j}\) reveals that \(\sum\nolimits_{{i \in\Theta _{p,c,g(p,c)} }} {(cy_{i} - I_{i} )}\) decreases if \(x_{i} < x_{j}\). Hence, while \(\sum\nolimits_{{i \in\Theta _{p,c,g(p,c)} }} {x_{i} }\) increases, it is not possible to state how \(\sum\nolimits_{{i \in\Theta _{p,c,g(p,c)} }} {y_{i} }\) changes; this depends on the parameter values. Thus, changes in \(\sum\nolimits_{{i \in\Theta _{p,c,g(p,c)} }} {b(x_{i} + y_{i} )}\) also depend on the parameter values.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yamamoto, Y. (2018). Feed-in Tariffs Combined with Capital Subsidies. In: Feed-in Tariffs and the Economics of Renewable Energy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76864-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76864-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76863-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76864-9
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)