Feed-in Tariffs Combined with Capital Subsidies

  • Yoshihiro Yamamoto


Both feed-in tariffs (FITs) and capital subsidies have been widely employed to promote the adoption of renewable energy technologies. This chapter sheds light on the combined use of FITs and capital subsidies. The purpose is to clarify their optimal combinations to encourage households to adopt photovoltaic (PV) systems or to encourage firms to invest in PV generation. This study develops a microeconomic model embodying the idea of two-part tariffs. The most important findings concern the combination that maximizes social welfare for the residential sector: if FITs are applied to the total PV electricity generated, they should be set at the avoided cost per unit of PV electricity, and capital subsidies should be used to control the number of adopters; whereas, if FITs are applied to only surplus PV electricity, the previous principle is distorted to some extent. A similar result is obtained for the business sector. In the model for the business sector, the government aims to have a certain installed capacity of PV panels, whereas in the model for the residential sector, its aim is to have a certain number of households adopt PV systems. The problem of equity, that is, how to finance the cost of FITs and capital subsidies is also discussed.


Feed-in tariff Capital subsidy Two-part tariff Photovoltaic system 


  1. Cerdá E, del Río P (2015) Different interpretations of the cost-effectiveness of renewable electricity support: some analytical results. Energy 90:286–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. del Río P, Cerdá E (2014) The policy implications of the different interpretations of the cost-effectiveness of renewable electricity support. Energy Policy 64:364–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. del Río P, Mir-Artigues P (2014) Combinations of support instruments for renewable electricity in Europe: A review. Ren Sustain Energy Rev 40:287–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dusonchet L, Telaretti E (2010) Economic analysis of different supporting policies for the production of electrical energy by solar photovoltaics in western European Union countries. Energy Policy 38:3297–3308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hirvonen J, Kayo G, Cao S, Hasan A, Sirén K (2015) Renewable energy production support schemes for residential-scale solar photovoltaic systems in Nordic conditions. Energy Policy 79:72–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hsu C-W (2011) Using a system dynamics model to assess the effects of capital subsidies and feed-in tariffs on solar PV installations. Appli Energy 100:205–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Klein A (2008) Feed-in tariff designs: options to support electricity generation from renewable energy sources. VDM Verlag Dr, Müller, SaarbrückenGoogle Scholar
  8. Lesser JA, Su X (2008) Design of an economically efficient feed-in tariff structure for renewable energy development. Energy Policy 36:981–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mayr D, Schmidt J, Schmid E (2014) The potentials of a reverse auction in allocating subsidies for cost-effective roof-top photovoltaic system deployment. Energy Policy 69:555–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. METI (2013) The report on the diffusion of PV systems in Japan. Accessed 6 Jul 2017 (In Japanese)
  11. Mir-Artigues P, del Río P (2014) Combining tariffs, investment subsidies and soft loans in a renewable electricity deployment policy. Energy Policy 69:430–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mir-Artigues P, del Río P (2016) The economics and policy of solar photovoltaic generation. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Oi WY (1971) A Disneyland dilemma: two-part tariffs for a Mickey Mouse monopoly. Q J Econ 85:77–96CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Oliva S, MacGill I, Passey R (2014) Estimating the net societal value of distributed household PV systems. Sol Energy 100:9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pirnia M, Nathwani J, Fuller D (2011) Ontario feed-in tariffs: system planning implications and impacts on social welfare. Electr J 24:18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yamamoto Y (2012) Pricing electricity from residential photovoltaic systems: a comparison of feed-in tariffs, net metering, and net purchase and sale. Sol Energy 86:2678–2685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zhao Y, Tang KK, Wang L (2013) Do renewable electricity policies promote renewable electricity generation? Evidence from panel data. Energy Policy 62:887–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Takasaki City University of EconomicsTakasakiJapan

Personalised recommendations