Structure: Multiplicity and Multiple in Deleuze and Badiou



This Chapter attends to multiplicity as structure in Deleuze’s and Badiou’s works, structures that are not articulated according to traditional philosophical conceptions of ‘the many,’ but are rather associated with mathematical paradigms. Bernhard Riemann’s continuous manifoldness and certain of its operational accompaniments inform Deleuze’s work, which I show in his account of the virtual Idea in Difference and Repetition and to the account of smooth and striated spaces in Plateau “1440: the Smooth and the Striated” in A Thousand Plateaus. Georg Cantor’s distinction of inconsistent from consistent multiples are at the foundation of Badiou’s ontology; Zermelo’s axiom of separation solves a problem (crystallized in Russell’s Paradox) about any possible relation between inconsistent and consistent multiples. Badiou’s work in Being and Event and a short description of inconsistent multiplicity in Briefings on Existence are the texts under investigation here.


  1. Aristotle. 1984. Categories. Translated by J.L. Ackrill. In The Complete Works of Aristotle: The Revised Oxford Translation, vol. I, edited by Jonathan Barnes, 3–24. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Badiou, Alain. 2005. Being and Event. Translated by Oliver Feltham. London: Continuum. Originally L’être et l’événement. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1988. (Cited in text as BE)Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2006. Briefings on Existence: A Short Treatise on Transitory Ontology. Translated, edited, and with an Introduction by Norman Madarasz. In Intersections: Philosophy and Critical Theory Series, edited by Rodolphe Gasché. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Originally Court Traité d’ontologie transitoire. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1998. (Cited in text as CT)Google Scholar
  4. Biagioli, Francesca. 2016. Space, Number, and Geometry from Helmholtz to Cassirer. Archimedes 46: New Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Burali-Forti, Cesare. 1977. “On Well-Ordered Classes (1897a).” Translated by Jean van Heijenoort. In From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, edited by Jean van Heijenoort, 111–112. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Cantor, Georg. 1977. “Letter to Dedekind (1899).” Translated by Stefan Bauer-Mengleberg and Jan van Heijenoort. In From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, edited by Jean van Heijenoort, 113–118. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Deleuze, Gilles. 1994. Difference and Repetition. Translated by Paul Patton. New York: Columbia University Press. Originally Différence et repetition. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1968. (Cited in text as DR)Google Scholar
  8. Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1981. Rhizome: An Introduction. Translated by Paul Patton. I & C 8 (Spring): 49–71. Originally Rhizome: Introduction. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 1976. (Cited in text as R)Google Scholar
  9. ———. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. Translated by Brian Massumi. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Originally Mille Plateaux. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 1980. (Cited in text as TP)Google Scholar
  10. Ferreirós, Jose. 2007. Labyrinth of Thought: A History of Set Theory and Its Role in Modern Mathematics. Basel: Birkhäuser Basel.Google Scholar
  11. Gillespie, Sam. 2008. The Mathematics of Novelty: Badiou’s Minimalist Metaphysics. Anamnesis. Melbourne: Scholar
  12. Livingston, Paul. 2012. The Politics of Logic. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Merzbach, Uta, and Carl Boyer. 2011. A History of Mathematics, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Plotnitsky, Arkady. 2006. “Manifolds: On the Concept of Space in Riemann and Deleuze.” In Virtual Mathematics: The Logic of Difference, edited by Simon Duffy, 187–208. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  15. ———. 2009. “Bernhard Riemann’s Conceptual Mathematics.” Configurations 17 (1–2): 105–130. Accessed 12 June 2013.
  16. Riemann, Bernhard. 1873. “On the Hypotheses Which Lie at the Bases of Geometry.” Translated by W.K. Clifford. Nature VIII (183–184): 14–17, 36–37.Google Scholar
  17. Russell, Bertrand. 1977. “Letter to Frege (1902).” In From Frege to Gödel: A Sourcebook in Mathematical Logic, edited by Jean van Heijenoort, 124–125. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Scholz, Erhard. 1992. “Riemann’s Vision of a New Approach to Geometry.” In 1830–1930: A Century of Geometry: Epistemology, History, and Mathematics, 22–34. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  19. Van Heijenoort, Jean. 1977. Introduction to “Georg Cantor: Letter to Dedekind (1899).” In From Frege to Gödel: A Source Book in Mathematical Logic, edited by Jean van Heijenoort, 113. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Voss, Daniela. 2013. Conditions of Thought: Deleuze and the Transcendental Idea. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zermelo, Ernst. 1977. “Investigations in the Foundations of Set Theory (1908a).” Translated by Stefan Bauer-Mengelberg. In From Frege to Gödel: a Sourcebook in Mathematical Logic, edited by Jan Van Heijenoort, 199–215. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Regis UniversityDenverUSA

Personalised recommendations