Skip to main content

The Human Brain: The Ultimate Scarce, Efficient, and Rational Resource

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Brain-Focused Foundation for Economic Science
  • 558 Accesses

Abstract

There is a growing divide between neoclassical and behavioral economics. This divide can be partially reconciled by recognizing that the critically scarce resources in all economic inquiries are inside the human brain, mainly neurons and energy that need to be rationally allocated by the brain itself in order to maximize achievement of competing internal demands. The brain must resolve its internal optimization problems before it can optimize the allocation of external resources with alternative uses. Accordingly, the brain will never seek perfect rationality in decision-making, mainly because it could not have evolved to be perfectly rational, in neoclassical terms. Rather, it will refine (and only perfect) its decisions so long as the added value of doing so is worth the added cost. It will also devise decision rules (heuristics) that work as well as is economical, but which will lead to decision errors. Decision errors can be a source of decision efficiency and welfare enhancement above what would be achieved under perfect rationality (if perfect rationality were possible, which it can’t be).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ariely, Dan. 2008. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bear, Adam, 2016. What neuroscience says about free will. Scientific American, June 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary S. 1962. Irrational behavior and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy 70 (1, February): 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Gary S., and Kevin M. Murphy. 1988. A theory of rational addiction. Journal of Political Economy 96 (August): 675–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Clayton. 1997. Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, David H. 2010. Why Experts Keep Failing Us and How to Know When Not to Trust Them. New York: Little Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larcom, Shaun, Ferdinand Rauch, and Tim Willems. 2017. The benefits of forced experimentation: Striking evidence from the London underground network. Quarterly Journal of Economics 132 (4, November): 2019–2055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Dwight. 1969. Utility analysis and repetitive gambling. American Economist 13 (2): 87–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, Richard B. 2010. Predictably Rational? In Search of Defenses for Rational Behavior in Economics. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mullainathan, Sendhill. 2017. Why trying new things is so hard to do. New York Times, December 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nease, Robert. 2016. The Power of Fifty Bits: The New Science of Turning Good Intentions into Positive Results. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael. 2009. The Tacit Dimension (revised edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, E., et al. 2014. Will smaller plates lead to smaller waists? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect that experimental manipulation of dishware size has on energy consumption. Obesity Review, July.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal, David. 2016. Solar snare: Spend thousands and cut power bills by $9 a month. New York Times, August 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, Barry. 2005. The Paradox of Choice. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, Richard H. 1990. Anomalies: Saving, fungibility, and mental accounts. Journal of Economic Perspectives 4 (1): 193–2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, Richard H. 1991. Quasi Rational Economics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wansink, Brian. 2007. Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More Than We Think. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wansink, Brian, and Koert van Ittersum. 2006. The visual illusions of food: Why plates, bowls, and spoons can vias consumption volume. FASEB Journal 20: A618.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard B. McKenzie .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McKenzie, R.B. (2018). The Human Brain: The Ultimate Scarce, Efficient, and Rational Resource. In: A Brain-Focused Foundation for Economic Science. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76810-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76810-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76809-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76810-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics