Advertisement

Behavioral Economics, Evolution, and the Human Brain

Chapter
  • 412 Downloads

Abstract

As early as the late 1950s with the work of Herbert Simon, psychologists began questioning the value of unbounded rationality in economic modeling, noting that the human brain faced its own evolved limited and imperfect internal resources. Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky in the 1970s began calling into serious question the neoclassical methodological approach by running a series of laboratory and survey experiments that found substantial gaps between the predictions of economic models grounded in perfect rationality and the way real people behave or say they would behave. In the late 1980s and continuing into this century, Richard Thaler uncovered a small library of “anomalies” in people’s behaviors, as judged by predictions from neoclassical economics, grounded in contemporary times (but not in earlier eras) in perfect rationality. A growing cadre of behavioral economists have gone further, concluding that people are so frequently “irrational” that they are “predictably irrational,” suggesting that neoclassical economists should fold their analytical efforts.

References

  1. Adler, Jerry. 2013. Why fire makes us human. Smithsonian Magazine, June.Google Scholar
  2. Aiello, L., and P. Wheeler. 1995. The expensive-tissue hypothesis: The brain and the digestive system in human and primate evolution. Current Anthropology 36: 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allais, M. 1953. Le comportement del’homme rationnel devant le risqué, critique des postulats et axioms de l’ecole Americaine. Econometrics 21: 503–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ariely, Dan. 2008. Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions. York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  5. Arkes, Hal R., and Catherine Blumer. 1985. The psychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 35 (February): 124–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aronson, E., and J. Mills. 1959. The effects of the severity of the initiation on liking for a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 59: 177–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Becker, Gary S. 1962. Irrational behavior and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy 70 (1, February): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Becker, Gary S. 1963. A reply to Israel Kirzner. Journal of Political Economy 71 (February): 82–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Becker, Gary S. 1971. The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (originally published in 1957).Google Scholar
  10. Berg, J., J. Dickhaut, and K. McCabe. 2005. Rick preference instability across institutions: A dilemma. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences 102: 4209–4214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boehm, Christopher. 1993. Egalitarian behavior and reverse dominance hierarchy. Current Anthropology 14: 227–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bonnefon, Jean-François, Azim Shariff, and Iyad Rahwan. 2016. The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science 352 (6291): 1573–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buss, David M. 1986. Human mate selection. American Scientist 73: 47–51.Google Scholar
  14. Buss, David M. 1989. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buss, David M., and Michael F. Barnes. 1986. Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50: 559–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buss, David M., et al. 1990. International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 societies. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 21: 5–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Buss, David M. 2003. The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Camerer, Colin F., and George Loewenstein. 2004. Behavioral economics: Past, present, and future. In Advances in Behavioral Economics, ed. Colin F. Camerer, George Loewenstein, and Matthew Rabin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Castro, J.M. Bermúdez de, M. Martinón Tores, S. Sarmiento, M. Lozano, J.L. Arsuaga, and E. Carbonell. 2003. Rates of anterior tooth wear in middle Pleistocene hominines from Sima de Los Huesos (Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain). PNAS 100 (21, October 14): 11992–11996. Google Scholar
  20. Cattau, Christopher E., et al. 2018. Rapid morphological change of a top predator with the invasion of novel prey. Nature Ecology and Evolution 2 (1, November 27): 108–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cosmides, Leda, John Tooby, and Jerome H. Barkow. 1992. Introduction: Evolutionary psychology and conceptual integration. In The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, ed. Jerome H. Barkow, Leda Cosmides, and John Tooby, 3–18. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Cowles, Alfred, and H. Jones. 1937. Some posteriori probabilities in stock market action. Econometrica 5: 280–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Darwin, Charles. 1859. Origins of the Species by Means of Natural Selection. New York: Random House (republished 1979).Google Scholar
  24. Dawkins, Richard. 1978. The Selfish Gene. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press (paperback).Google Scholar
  25. Dennett, Daniel C. 2003. Freedom Evolves. New York: Viking Adult.Google Scholar
  26. Dunbar, Robin. 1998. The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology 6: 178–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Elder, Glen H. 1969. Appearance and education in marriage mobility. American Sociological Review 34 (4): 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fama, Eugene F. 1965a. The behavior of stock market prices. Journal of Business 38: 34–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fama, Eugene F. 1965b. Random walks in stock market prices. Financial Analysts Journal 21 (5, September/October): 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fedrigo, O., A. Pfefferle, et al. 2011. A potential role for glucose transporters in the evolution of human brain size. Brain, Behavior and Evolution 78: 315–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Frank, Steven A. 2009. Evolutionary foundations of cooperation and group cohesion. In Games, Groups, and the Global Good, ed. Simon A. Levin. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Friedman, Milton. 1966. Essays in Positive Economics. New York: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Genesove, David, and Christopher Mayer. 2001. Loss aversion and seller behavior: Evidence from the housing market. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (4, November): 1233–1260.Google Scholar
  34. Gerard, H.B., and G.C. Mathewson. 1966. The effects of severity of initiation on liking for a group: A replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2 (July): 278–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gigerenzer, Gerd. 2008. Rationality for Mortals: How People Cope with Uncertainty. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Gigerenzer, Gerd, Peter M. Todd, and the ABC Research Group (eds.). 1999a. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Peter M. Todd. 1999b. Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. In Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, ed. Gigerenzer, Gerd, Peter M. Todd, and the ABC Research Group, 1–18. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Gintis, Herbert. 2000a. Game Theory Evolving. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Gintis, Herbert. 2000b. Strong reciprocity and human sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology 211: 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gould, Stephen Jay. 1990. Wonderful Life: Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  41. Gourville, John T., and Dilip Soman. 1998. Payment depreciation: The effects of temporally separating payments from consumption. Journal of Consumer Research 25 (September): 160–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hamilton, W.D. 1963. The evolution of altruistic behavior. American Naturalist 97 (896): 354–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hamilton, W.D. 1964. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Biology 7 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hoffman, Elizabeth, Kevin A. McCabe, and Vernon L. Smith. 1998. Behavioral foundations of reciprocity: Experimental economics and evolutionary psychology. Economic Inquiry 36: 335–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Holmes, Bob. 2009. Did the ice age boost human brain size? New Scientist, July 29.Google Scholar
  46. Isaac, R. Mark, and D. James. 2000. Just who are you calling risk averse. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 20: 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Isaac, R. Mark, James M. Walker, and Susan H. Thomas. 1984. Divergent evidence on free riding: An experimental examination and possible explanation. Public Choice 43: 113–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Isaac, R. Mark, Kenneth F. McCue, and Charles Plott. 1985. Public goods provision in an experimental environment. Journal of Public Economics 26: 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Jones, Philip, and John Cullis. 2000. Individual failure: And the analytics of social policy. Journal of Social Policy 29 (1): 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica 47: 313–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  52. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 2000a. Choices, values, and frames, as reprinted in Choices, Values, and Frames, ed. Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, 1–16. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 2000b. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, as reprinted in Choices, Values, and Frames, ed. Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, 17–43. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Kahneman, Daniel, J. Knetsch, and Richard H. Thaler. 1990. Experimental tests of the endowment and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy 98 (6): 1325–1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kim, Oliver, and Mark Walker. 1984. The free rider problem: Experimental evidence. Public Choice 43: 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kirzner, Israel M. 1962. Rational action and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy 70 (August): 380–385. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kirzner, Israel M. 1963. Rejoinder. Journal of Political Economy 71 (August): 82–83.Google Scholar
  58. Klein, Joanna. 2016. Lacking brains, plants can still make good judgements about risks. New York Times, June 30.Google Scholar
  59. Knauft, Bruce. 1991. Violence and sociality in human evolution. Current Anthropology 32: 391–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Korkki, Phyllis. 2016. Paying with cash hurts. That’s also why it feels so good. New York Times, July 16. Available online from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/17/business/paying-with-cash-hurts-thats-also-why-itfeels-so-good.html.
  61. Lakatos, L., and Z. Janka. 2008. Evolution of human brain and intelligence. PubMed.gov, July 30.Google Scholar
  62. Leclerc, France, Berndt Schmitt, and Laurette Dubé. 1995. Is time like money? Decision making and waiting time. Journal of Consumer Research 22: 110–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ledyard, John O. 1995. Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In Handbook of Experimental Economics, ed. John H. Kager and Alvin E. Roth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Leonard, W., M. Robertson, et al. 2003. Metabolic correlates of hominid brain evolution. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 136: 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lewis, Michael. 2016. The Undoing Project: A Friendship That Changed Our Minds. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  66. Loewenstein, George, and Nachum Sicherman. 1991. Do workers prefer increasing wage profiles? Journal of Lahor Economics 9 (1): 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Marcus, Gary. 2008. Kluge: The Haphazard Evolution of the Human Mind. Boston: Mariner Books.Google Scholar
  68. Marlowe, Frank, Coren Apicella, and Dorian Reed. 2005. Men’s preferences for women’s profile waist-to-hip ratio in two societies. Evolution and Human Behavior 26: 458–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Marwell, Gerald, and Ruth Ames. 1981. Economists free ride: Does anyone else? Journal of Public Economics 15: 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. McAuliffe, Kathleen. 2011. If modern humans are so smart, why are our brains shrinking? Discover, January 20.Google Scholar
  71. McCabe, K., and V.L. Smith. 1999. A comparison of naive and sophisticated subject behavior with game theoretic predictions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97: 3777–3781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. McKenzie, Richard B. 2010. Predictably irrational or predictably rational? Library of Economics and Liberty.Google Scholar
  73. Plott, Charles, and K. Zeiler. 2005. The willingness to pay/willingness to accept gap, the endowment effect. Subject misconceptions and experimental procedures for eliciting valuations. American Economic Review 95 (3): 530–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Pratt, John W., David A. Wise, and Richard Zeckhauser. 1979. Price differences in almost competitive markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics 93 (2): 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Robbins, Lionel. 1935. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. Auburn, Al: Ludwig von Misses Institute (first published in 1932 and revised and reissued in 2007).Google Scholar
  76. Rubin, Paul H. 2002. Darwinian Politics: The Evolutionary Origin of Freedom. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Rubin, Paul H., and Chris Paul. 1979. An evolutionary model of taste for risk. Economic Inquiry 17: 585–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Schilthuizen, Menno. 2016. Evolution is happening faster than we thought. New York Times, July 23.Google Scholar
  79. Shiller, Robert J. 2005. Irrational Exuberance, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  80. Shiller, Robert J. 2008. The Subprime Solution: How Today’s Global Financial Crisis Happened and What to Do About It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Simon, Herbert. 1957. Models of Man. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  82. Singh, Devendra. 1993. Adaptive significance of waist-to-hip ratio and female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65: 293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Singh, Devendra. 1994. Is thin really beautiful and good: Relationship between waist-to-hip ration (WHR) and female attractiveness. Personality and Individual Differences 16: 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Skouras, Thanos, George J. Avlonitis, and Kostis A. Indounas. 2005. Economics and marketing on pricing: How and why do they differ. Journal of Product and Brand Management 14 (6): 362–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Smith, Adam. 1759. The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. D.D. Raphael and A.L. Macfie, vol. I of the Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund (1982).Google Scholar
  86. Smith, Adam. 1776 (reprinted 1904). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. In Library of Economics and Liberty, ed. Edwin Cannan. London, UK: Methuen and Co., Ltd. Available online from http://www.econlib.org/library/Smith/smWN1.html.
  87. Smith, J. Maynard. 1964. Group selection and kin selection. Nature 201 (4924): 1145–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Smith, Vernon L. 2008. Rationality in Economics: Constructivist and Ecological Forms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Steiner, Mary C., Natalie D. Munro, Todd A. Surovell, Eitan Tchernov, and Ofer Bar-Yosef. 1999. Paleolithic population growth pulses evidenced by small animal exploitation, Science 283 (5399, September 25): 190–194. Google Scholar
  90. Taylor, Patricia A., and Norval D. Glenn. 1976. The utility of education and attractiveness for female status attainment through marriage. American Sociological Review 41: 484–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Thaler, Richard H. 1991. Quasi Rational Economics. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  92. Thaler, Richard H. 1992. The Winner’s Curse: Paradoxes and Anomalies of Economic Life. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  93. Thaler, Richard H. (ed.). 1993. Advances in Behavioral Finance. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  94. Thaler, Richard H. 2000a. Mental accounting matters. As reprinted in Choices, Values, and Frames, ed. by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 241–268.Google Scholar
  95. Thaler, Richard H. 2000b. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice, as reprinted in Choices, Values, and Frames, ed. by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 269–287.Google Scholar
  96. Thaler, Richard H. (ed.). 2005. Advances in Behavioral Finance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Thaler, Richard H., and Cass R. Sunstein. 2009. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  99. Trivers, Robert L. 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology 46: 35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Trivers, Robert L. 1985. Social Evolution. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin-Cummings.Google Scholar
  101. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1981. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211 (4481): 453–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Udry, J. Richard, and Bruce K. Eckland. 1984. Benefits of being attractive: Differential payoffs for men and women. Psychological Reports 54: 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Veblen, Thorsten. 1898. Why is economics not an evolutionary science? Quarterly Journal of Economics 12 (4): 373–397, also available online with an introduction by Jean Boulton. 2010. E:CO Issue 12 (2): 41–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Weber, Martin, and Colin F. Camerer. 1998. The disposition effect in securities trading: An experimental analysis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 33 (2): 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wedekind, C., T. Seebeck, F. Bettens, and A.J. Paepke. 1995. MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London 260: 245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wilson, Edward O. 2012. The Social Conquest of Earth. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
  107. Wilson, James Q. 1993. The Moral Sense. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  108. Zak, Paul. 2012. The Moral Molecule: The Source of Love and Prosperity. Boston: Dutton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Paul Merage School of BusinessUniversity of California, IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations