(Un)Mapping the City Beautiful: Orlando Florida’s “Ugly” Settler Colonial Legacy

  • Stephanie K. Wheeler


This chapter reflects on the production of Orlando, Florida and how the prevailing vision of its downtown development reiterates the enduring legacy of settler colonialism through its anti-homeless policies. These policies manifest as ugly laws, laws designed to define the unsightly and unwanted bodies of the citizenry in order to keep them from view. These laws are presented simultaneously as concerning aesthetics, safety issues, and even charity, while also serving the enduring settler colonial power structures that first shaped and sanctioned the state of Florida. The focus for analysis is the existing policies that regulate the downtown district of Orlando. These policies exhibit many of the characteristics that Susan Schweik identifies in the ugly laws, particularly with regard to the social, textual, and performative contexts in which the laws are deployed. Ultimately, this analysis denaturalizes downtown space in order to disrupt notions of white settler innocence and neutrality of space. The chapter demonstrates how Orlando’s strategies of city regulation are used to ensure the absence of ugliness, and how these techniques are deployed to maintain the dominance of both settler colonialism and the dynamics between settler society and ableism.


  1. Alfred, Taiaiake. 2009. Colonialism and State Dependency. Journal of Aboriginal Health 5: 41–60.Google Scholar
  2. Blomley, Nicholas K. 2004. Unsettling the City: Urban Land and the Politics of Property. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Byers, Joseph. 1916. Public Address to the 1916 National Conference of Charities and Corrections. Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections, 224–226.Google Scholar
  4. Culhane, Dara. 1998. The Pleasure of the Crown: Anthropology, Law and First Nations. Burnaby: Talonbooks.Google Scholar
  5. Florida’s Council on Homelessness. 2016. 2016 Report. Tallahassee: Department of Children and Families.Google Scholar
  6. Foucault, Michel. 1977. The Means of Correct Training. In Madness and Civilization. Trans. Christian Hubert, ed. Paul Rabinow (1984), 188–205. The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 1984. “Space, Power, Knowledge,” Interview with Paul Rabinow. In The Foucault Reader. Trans. Christian Hubert, ed. Paul Rabinow, 252. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  8. Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. 1997. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Harris, Cole. 2004. How Did Colonialism Disposses? Comments from an Edge of Empire. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94 (1): 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hart, Hastings. 1918. Hastings Hart, with the Assistance of Clarence Stonaker, Plan for the State of Florida-Prepared at the Request Sidney J. Catts, Governor, and the Cabinet of State Hammack, ed., The Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  11. Kawash, Samira. 1998. The Homeless Body. Public Culture 10 (2): 319–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kunerth, Jeff. 2017. Florida Jails Have Become ‘The Asylums of the New Millennium.’ Orlando Sentinel.
  13. Lefebvre, Henri. 1992. The Production of Space. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Morgensen, Scott Lauria. 2011. The Biopolitics of Settler Colonialism: Right Here, Right Now. Settler Colonial Studies 1 (1): 52–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty and the National Coalition for the Homeless. 2009. Homes Not Handcuffs: The Criminalization of Homelessness in U.S. Cities. Washington, DC: NLCHP/NCH.Google Scholar
  16. Noll, Steven. 1995. Feeble-Minded in Our Midst: Institutions for the Mentally Retarded in the South, 1900–1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  17. O’Brien, Jean M. 2010. Firsting and Lasting: Writing Indians Out of Existence in New England. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Orlando City Council. 2017a. Panhandling. Sec. 43.86. Available from: Accessed 21 July 2017.
  19. ———. 2017b. Panhandling. Solicitation and Off-Premises Canvassing on Public Property in the Downtown Core District of Orlando, Florida. Sec. 43.87. Available from: Accessed 21 July 2017.
  20. ———. 2017c. Panhandling. Sitting/Lying on Sidewalks in the Downtown Core District Prohibited. Sec. 43.88. Available from: Accessed 21 July 2017.
  21. Phillips, Richard. 1997. Mapping Men and Empire: A Geography of Adventure. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Razack, Sherene H. 2002. When Place Becomes Race. In Race, Space, and the Law: Unmapping a White Settler Society, 1–20. Toronto: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
  23. Renda, Mary. 2001. “Sentiments of a Private Nature:” A Comment on Ann Laura Stoler’s “Tense and Tender Ties.” The Journal of American History 88 (3): 882–887.Google Scholar
  24. Rifkin, Mark. 2014. Settler Common Sense. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  25. Schweik, Susan M. 2009. The Ugly Laws: Disability in Public. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, Andrea. 2015. Conquest: Sexual Violence and American Indian Genocide. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Snyder, Sharon L., and David T. Mitchell. 2006. Cultural Locations of Disability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Toews, Owen. 2015. Resettling the City? Settler Colonialism, Neoliberalism, and Urban Land in Winnipeg, Canada. New York: CUNY Academic Works.Google Scholar
  29. Veracini, Lorenzo. 2011. Introducing Settler Colonial Studies. Settler Colonial Studies 1 (1): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wolfe, Patrick. 2006. Settler Colonialism and the Elimination of the Native. Journal of Genocide Research 8 (4): 387–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie K. Wheeler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Writing and RhetoricUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA

Personalised recommendations