• Nina Athanassoglou-Kallmyer


“Ugliness” is an appraisal of ugliness that was first articulated in an encyclopedic entry I authored in 2003, that engaged the function of ugliness in art history, literature, and aesthetic theory. This piece to be republished in On the Politics of Ugliness provides a comprehensive overview of ugliness, tracing its historical evolution, its manifold iterations, and the political salience of the beauty/ugliness dichotomy. In providing a robust history of the philosophical, literary and art historical understandings of ugliness as a concept and a category, I situate ugliness as a category of marginality, demonstrating the ways in which it is a politically invested category shaped by issues of hierarchy, value, and power.


  1. Adorno, Theodor W. 1997. Aesthetic Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aristotle. 1987. Poetics. Trans. R. Janko. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  3. Athanassoglou-Kallmyer, Nina. 1992. Géricaul’s Severed Heads and Limbs: The Politics and Aesthetics of the Scaffold. Art Bulletin 74(4): 599–618.Google Scholar
  4. Bakhtin, Mikhail. [1935] 1984. Rabelais and His World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Barreré, Jean-Bertrand. 1972. Victor Hugo’s Interest in the Grotesque in His Poetry and Drawings. In French Nineteenth-Century Painting and Literature, ed. U. Finke, 258–279. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Barrett, David. 1977. Chris Ofili. In Sensation: Young British Artists from the Saatchi Collection. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
  7. Bataille, Georges. 1970. L’abjection et les formes misérables. In Oeuvres complètes, 217–221. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1985. Visions of Excess: Selected Writings, 1927–1939. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  9. Baudelaire, Charles. [1863] 1961. Le peintre de la vie moderne. In Oeuvres complètes, 51–111. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  10. Bois, Yve-Alain, and Rosalind Krauss. 1997. Formless: A User’s Guide. New York: Zone.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, T.J. 1985. The Painting of Modern Life: Paris in the Art of Manet and his Followers. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  12. Connelly, Frances. 1995. The Sleep of Reason: Primitivism in Modern European Art and Aesthetics, 1725–1907. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cook, Albert, ed. 1926. The Art of Poetry: The Poetical Treatises of Horace, Vida, and Boileau. New York: Stechert.Google Scholar
  14. Crow, Thomas. [1987] 1990. Saturday Disasters: Trace and Reference in Early Warhol. In Reconstructing Modernism: Art in New York, Paris, and Montreal, 1945–1964, 311–326, ed. Serge Guilbaut. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Diderot, Denis, and Jean le Rond D’Alembert. [1757] 1966 and [1765] 1988. Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, vols. 7 and 9. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Friedrich Frommann Verlag.Google Scholar
  16. Didi-Hubermann, Georges. 1995. La ressemblance informe ou Le savoir visuel selon Georges Bataille. Paris: Macula.Google Scholar
  17. Foster, Hal. 1996a. Obscene, Abject, Traumatic. October 78: 107–124.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 1996b. The Return of the Real. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gautier, Théophile. [1834] 1910. Mademoiselle de Maupin. Paris: Charpentier.Google Scholar
  20. Harpham, Geoffrey Galt. 1982. On the Grotesque: Strategies of Contration in Art and Literature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hegel, G.W.F. 1993. Introductory Lectures on Aesthetics. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  22. Herbert, Robert, ed. 1964. The Art Criticism of John Ruskin. New York: Da Capo.Google Scholar
  23. Hesiod. 1988. Theogony and Works and Days, ed. M.L. West. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hugo, Victor. [1827] 1968. Cromwell. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
  25. ———. [1830] 1963. Hernani. In Théâtre complet de Victor Hugo. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  26. Kant, Immanuel. [1790] 1911. Kant’s Critique of Aesthetic Judgement. Trans. James Creed Meredith. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  27. Kayser, Wolfgang. 1966. The Grotesque in Art and Literature. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  28. Koerner, Joseph Leo. 1997. The Abject of Art History. RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 31: 5–8.Google Scholar
  29. Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kuryluk, Ewa. 1987. Salome and Judas in the Cave of Sex. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Larousse, Pierre. [1873] 1982. Grand Dictionnaire universel du XIXe sfvl. 10. Paris: Slatkine Reprints.Google Scholar
  32. Lee, Rensselaer W. 1967. Ut Pictura Poesis: The Humanistic Theory of Painting. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  33. Melot, Michel. 1985. Ceci ne sera jamais la tête du Christ: Victor Hugo caricaturiste. In Soleil d’encre: Manuscrits et dessins de Victor Hugo. Paris: Musée du Petit Palais.Google Scholar
  34. Mulvey, Laura. 1991. A Phantasmagoria of the Female Body: The Work of Cindy Sherman. New Left Review, no. 188: 136–150.Google Scholar
  35. Nash, Suzanne. 1980. Transfiguring Disfiguration in L’Homme qui rit: A Study of Hugo’s Use of the Grotesque. In Pre-text, Text, Context: Essays on Nineteenth-Century French Literature, ed. Robert L. Mitchell. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Rosen, Elisheva. 1991. Sur le grotesque: L’ancien et le nouveau dans la réflexion esthétique. Saint Denis: Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
  37. Rosenkranz, Karl. [1853] 1996. Aesthetik des Hässlichen, ed. Dieter Kliché. Leipzig: Reclam.Google Scholar
  38. Stafford, Barbara Maria. 1991. Body Criticism. Imaging the Unseen in Enlightenment Art and Medicine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Stallybrass, Peter, and Allon White. 1986. The Politics and Poetics of Transgression. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Stewart, Susan. 1993. On Longing: Narratives of the Miniature, the Gigantic, the Souvenir, the Collection. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Ubersfeld, Anne. 1974. D’une théorie du grotesque. In Le Roi et le bouffon: Etude sur le théâtre de Hugo de 1830 à 1839. Paris: José Corti.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nina Athanassoglou-Kallmyer
    • 1
  1. 1.University of DelawareNewarkUSA

Personalised recommendations