Skip to main content

Introduction: New Dimensions in the Politics of Image and Aid

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Communicating National Image through Development and Diplomacy

Abstract

This interdisciplinary collection explores new dimensions in the politics of image and aid. The approach taken by this timely volume is to consider a variety of cases drawing upon a combination of theoretical and conceptual lenses that each in their own way combine a focus on aid with a focus on image. The cases in this volume consist of empirical contributions in regions as diverse as Kosovo, Korea, Mexico, Turkey, Afghanistan, Somalia, Sweden, Colombia, Russia, and China. They seek to explore foreign policy trends originating with some of the most powerful Northern donors in order to see how they are influencing patterns of national development. This introduction outlines some essential themes in the relationship between soft power, public diplomacy, development communication, and nation brands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anholt, S. (1998). Nation-Brands of the Twenty-First Century. The Journal of Brand Management, 5(6), 395–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anholt, S. (2007). Competitive Identity: The New Brand Management for Nations, Cities and Regions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronczyk, M. (2008). “Living the Brand”: Nationality, Globality and the Identity Strategies of Nation Branding Consultants. International Journal of Communication, 2, 41–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronczyk, M. (2013). Branding the Nation: The Global Business of National Identity. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berridge, G. R. (2002). Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. Hampshire: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd-Barrett, O. (1977). Media Imperialism: Towards an International Framework for the Analysis of Media Systems. In J. Curran, M. Gurevitch, & J. Woollacott (Eds.), Mass Communication and Society (pp. 116–135). London: Edward Arnold in Association with The Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd-Barrett, O. (2007). Cyberspace, Globalization and US Empire. In O. Boyd-Barrett (Ed.), Communications Media, Globalization and Empire (pp. 53–76). Eastleigh: John Libbey Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, C. S. (2014). Nation Branding and Development: Poverty Panacea or Business as Usual. Journal of International Relations and Development. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2014.14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2008). The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 78–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comor, E., & Bean, H. (2012). America’s ‘Engagement’ Delusion: Critiquing a Public Diplomacy Consensus. International Communication Gazette, 74(3), 203–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cull, N. J. (2008). The Cold War and the United States Information Agency: American Propaganda and Public Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cull, N. J. (2009). Public Diplomacy before Gullion: The Evolution of a Phrase. In N. Snow & P. M. Taylor (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy (pp. 19–23). London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elwes, A. (1994). Nations for Sale. London: DBB Needham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entman, R. M. (2004). Theorizing Mediated Public Diplomacy: The U.S. Case. Press/Politics, 13(2), 87–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a Theory of Public Diplomacy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(55), 55–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, C. (2012). The Rhetoric of Soft Power: Public Diplomacy in Global Contexts. New York: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, C. (2013). Logics of Narrative and Networks in US Public Diplomacy: Communication Power and US Strategic Engagement. The Journal of International Communication, 19(2), 196–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, C. (2015). Scope, Mechanism, and Outcome: Arguing Soft Power in the Context of Public Diplomacy. Journal of International Relations and Development, 20, 331–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, B. (2005). Rethinking the “New” Public Diplomacy. In J. Melissen (Ed.), The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations (pp. 28–43). Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, B. (2006). Multistakeholder Diplomacy: Forms, Functions, and Frustrations. In J. Kurbalija & V. Katrandjiev (Eds.), Multistakeholder Diplomacy: Challenges and Opportunities (pp. 13–29). Malta and Geneva: DiploFoundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, B., Melissen, J., Riordan, S., & Sharp, P. (2012). Futures for Diplomacy: Integrative Diplomacy in the 21st Century. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations ‘Clingendael’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, S. C. (2008). Designer Nations: Neo-liberal Nation Branding—Brand Estonia. Social Identities: Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture, 14(1), 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneva, N. (2011a). Nation Branding: Toward an Agenda for Critical Research. International Journal of Communication, 5, 117–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneva, N. (2011b). Who Can Play This Game? The Rise of Nation Branding in Bulgaria, 2001–2005. In N. Kaneva (Ed.), Branding Post-communist Nations. Marketizing National Identities in the ‘New’ Europe (pp. 99–123). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneva, N. (Ed.). (2012). Branding Post-communist Nations: Marketizing National Identities in the ‘New’ Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaneva, N. (2015). Nation Branding and Commercial Nationalism: Notes for a Materialist Critique. In Z. Volcic & M. Andrejevic (Eds.), Commercial Nationalism: Selling the Nation and Nationalizing the Sell (pp. 175–193). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J. R. (2010). The New Diplomacy: Evolution of a Revolution. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 21(2), 286–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, L., & Lucas, S. (2005). Enduring Freedom: Public Diplomacy and U.S. Foreign Policy. American Quarterly, 57(2), 309–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1977). Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition (2nd ed.). Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1998). Power and Interdependence in the Information Age. Foreign Affairs, 77(5), 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, M. (1997). Renewing Our Identity. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manheim, J. B. (1994). Strategic Public Diplomacy and American Foreign Policy: The Evolution of Influence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattelart, A. (1979). Multinational Corporations & the Control of Culture: The Ideological Apparatuses of Imperialism (M. Chanan, Trans.). Sussex: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattelart, A. (2002). An Archaeology of the Global Era: Constructing a Belief. Media, Culture and Society, 24(5), 591–612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melissen, J. (Ed.). (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Soft Power in International Relations. Hampshire, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, I. B. (2013). Diplomatic Sites: A Critical Enquiry. London, UK: Hurst & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordenstreng, J. (1984). The Mass Media Declaration of UNESCO. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. (1990). Soft Power. Foreign Policy, 80, 152–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. New York, NY: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Soft Power. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, 94–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamment, J. (2013). New Public Diplomacy in the 21st Century. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamment, J. (2014). The Mediatization of Diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 9(3), 253–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamment, J. (2015). Media Influence, Ontological Transformation & Social Change: Conceptual Overlaps Between Development Communication and Public Diplomacy. Communication Theory, 25(2), 188–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamment, J. (Ed.). (2016a). Intersections Between Public Diplomacy & International Development: Case Studies in Converging Fields (USC Center on Public Diplomacy Perspectives Series). Los Angeles, CA: Figueroa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamment, J. (2016b). The International Aid Transparency Initiative: Communication for Development or Public Diplomacy? In J. Pamment (Ed.), Intersections Between Public Diplomacy & International Development: Case Studies in Converging Fields (USC Center on Public Diplomacy Perspectives Series). Los Angeles, CA: Figueroa Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamment, J. (2016c). Toward a New Conditionality? The Convergence of International Development, Nation Brands & Soft Power in the British National Security Strategy. Journal of International Relations & Development, 1–16, Online first.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamment, J. (2016d). British Public Diplomacy and Soft Power: Diplomatic Influence and Digital Disruption. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pamment, J., & Wilkins, K. G. (2016). Toward a ‘Common Standard’ for Aid Transparency: Discourses of Global Citizenship Surrounding the BRICS. International Journal of Communication, 10, 2989–3003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, H. I. [1969] 1992. Mass Communications & American Empire (2nd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, H. I. (1976). Communication and Cultural Domination. New York: International Arts and Sciences Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, P. (1999). For Diplomacy: Representation and the Study of International Relations. International Studies Review, 1(1), 33–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ståhlberg, P., & Bolin, G. (2010). Between Community and Commodity: Nationalism and Nation Branding. In A. Roosvall & I. Salovaara-Moring (Eds.), Communicating the Nation. National Topographies of Global Media Landscapes (pp. 79–101). Göteborg: Nordicom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szondi, G. (2008). Public Diplomacy and Nation Branding: Conceptual Similarities and Differences. Discussion Papers in Diplomacy. Clingendael, Netherlands Institute of International Relations, The Hauge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. B. (1995). The Media & Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thussu, D. K. (2013). Communicating India’s Soft Power: Buddha to Bollywood. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, J. (1991). Cultural Imperialism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, J. (1997). Internationalism, Globalization and Cultural Imperialism. In K. Thompson (Ed.), Media and Cultural Regulation (pp. 117–162). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunstall, J. (1977). The Media Are American: Anglo-American Media in the World. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Elteren, M. (2003). U.S. Cultural Imperialism Today: Only a Chimera? SAIS Review, 23(2), 169–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ham, P. (2002). Branding Territory: Inside the Wonderful Worlds of PR and IR Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 32(2), 249–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ham, P. (2010). Social Power in International Politics. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volcic, Z., & Andrejevic, M. (2011). Nation Branding in the Era of Commercial Nationalism. International Journal of Communication, 5, 598–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, K. G. (2016). Communicating Gender and Advocating Accountability in Global Development. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, K. G., & Mody, B. (2001). Reshaping Development Communication: Developing Communication and Communicating Development. Communication Theory, 11(4), 385–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, J., & Spanger, H. J. (2015). The Interaction of Interests and Norms in International Democracy Promotion. Journal of International Relations and Development, 20(1), 80–107.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Pamment .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pamment, J., Wilkins, K.G. (2018). Introduction: New Dimensions in the Politics of Image and Aid. In: Pamment, J., Wilkins, K.G. (eds) Communicating National Image through Development and Diplomacy. Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76759-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics