Abstract
Timeus analyses how public managers’ risk perceptions shape their willingness to pursue collaborative innovation. Through qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with public managers in Barcelona municipality, Timeus shows how they avoided collaboration in the design stage of innovation to limit the risk of losing control and authority over the innovation process. This risk-avoiding behaviour motivated public managers to limit collaboration to the implementation stages of innovation, mainly to transfer operational and financial risks to the private sector. Timeus’ analysis shows that public managers’ risk perceptions limit their willingness to collaborate precisely when collaboration can most benefit the innovation process: in the design stage. This helps explain why public managers often overlook or avoid opportunities to engage other actors in solving complex problems.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abrahamson, E., & Rosenkopf, L. (1997). Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organization Science, 8(3), 289–309.
Agger, A., & Sørensen, E. (2014). Designing collaborative policy innovation: Lessons from a Danish municipality. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Public innovation through collaboration and design (pp. 170–208). Abingdon: Routledge.
Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (Eds.). (2014). Public innovation through collaboration and design. Abingdon: Routledge.
Bekkers, V., Edelenbos, J., & Steijn, B. (2011). An innovative public sector? Embarking on the innovation journey. In V. Bekkers, J. Edelenbos, & B. Steijn (Eds.), Innovation in the public sector: Linking capacity and leadership (pp. 197–221). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Boholm, Å., & Corvellec, H. (2011). A relational theory of risk. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 175–190.
Bommert, B. (2010). Collaborative innovation in the public sector. International Public Management Review, 11(1), 15–33.
Brogaard, L. (2017). The impact of innovation training on successful outcomes in public–private partnerships. Public Management Review, 19(8), 1184–1205.
Brown, L. (2010). Balancing risk and innovation to improve social work practice. British Journal of Social Work, 40(4), 1211–1228.
Brown, L., & Osborne, S. P. (2013). Risk and innovation. Public Management Review, 15(2), 186–208.
Busuioc, E. M. (2016). Friend or foe? Inter-agency cooperation, organizational reputation, and turf. Public Administration, 94(1), 40–56.
Bysted, R., & Jespersen, K. R. (2014). Exploring managerial mechanisms that influence innovative work behaviour: Comparing private and public employees. Public Management Review, 16(2), 217–241.
Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The forging of bureaucratic autonomy: Reputations, networks, and policy innovation in executive agencies, 1862–1928. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
De Vries, H. A., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. G. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and future research agenda. Public Administration, 94(1), 146–166.
Doberstein, C. (2016). Designing collaborative governance decision-making in search of a ‘collaborative advantage’. Public Management Review, 18(6), 819–841.
Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E.-H. (2009). Project versus process management in public–private partnership: Relation between management style and outcomes. International Public Management Journal, 12(3), 310–331.
Ferrado, M. L. (2014). Doctor smart on the phone. Barcelona Metròpolis, 91, 20–21.
Gavaldà, J., & Ribera-Fumaz, R. (2012). Barcelona 5.0: From knowledge to smartness (Working Paper Series No. WP12–002). Barcelona: Universitat Oberta de Catalunya.
Hambleton, R., & Howard, J. (2013). Place-based leadership and public service innovation. Local Government Studies, 39(1), 47–70.
Harrow, J. (1997). Managing risk and delivering quality services: A case study perspective. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 10(5), 331–352.
Hartley, J. (2013). Public and private features of innovation. In S. P. Osborne & L. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of innovation in public services (pp. 44–59). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Hodge, G. A., & Greve, C. (2005). The challenge of public–private partnerships: Learning from international experience. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Hood, C. (2011). The blame game: Spin, bureaucracy, and self-preservation in government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Huxham, C. (1996). Creating collaborative advantage. London: Sage.
Huxham, C., & Macdonald, D. (1992). Introducing collaborative advantage: Achieving inter-organizational effectiveness through meta-strategy. Management Decision, 30(3), 50–56.
Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Abingdon: Routledge.
Huxham, C., Vangen, S., Huxham, C., & Eden, C. (2000). The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 2(3), 337–358.
Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E., & West, M. A. (2004). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: A special issue introduction. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 129–145.
Klein, P. G., Mahoney, J. T., McGahan, A. M., & Pitelis, C. N. (2010). Toward a theory of public entrepreneurship. European Management Review, 7(1), 1–15.
Klijn, E., & Teisman, G. R. (2003). Institutional and strategic barriers to public-private partnership: An analysis of Dutch cases. Public Money & Management, 23(3), 137–146.
Koppenjan, J. (2008). Creating a playing field for assessing the effectiveness of network collaboration by performance measures. Public Management Review, 10(6), 699–714.
Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Verhoest, K. (2011). Explaining the innovative culture and activities of state agencies. Organization Studies, 32(10), 1321–1347.
Mandell, M., Keast, R., & Chamberlain, D. (2017). Collaborative networks and the need for a new management language. Public Management Review, 19(3), 326–341.
Meyer, R. E., Egger-Peitler, I., Höllerer, M. A., & Hammerschmid, G. (2014). Of bureaucrats and passionate public managers: Institutional logics, executive identities, and public service motivation. Public Administration, 92(4), 861–885.
Moynihan, D. P. (2012). Extra-network organizational reputation and blame avoidance in networks: The hurricane Katrina example. Governance, 25(4), 567–588.
Mulgan, G. (2012). The theoretical foundations of social innovation. In A. Nicholls & A. Murdock (Eds.), Social innovation: Blurring boundaries to reconfigure markets (pp. 33–65). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
O’Toole, L. J. (1997). Treating networks seriously: Practical and research-based agendas in public administration. Public Administration Review, 57(1), 45–52.
Osborne, S. P., & Brown, L. (2011). Innovation in public services: Engaging with risk. Public Money & Management, 31(1), 4–6.
Osborne, S. P., & Flemig, S. (2015). Conceptualizing risk and social innovation: An integrated framework for risk governance. Society and Economy in Central and Eastern Europe, 37(2), 165–182.
Parker, D., & Hartley, K. (2003). Transaction costs, relational contracting and public private partnerships: A case study of UK defence. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(3), 97–108.
Puttick, R., Baeck, P., & Colligan, P. (2014). i-teams: The teams and funds making innovation happen in governments around the world. London and New York: Nesta and Bloomberg Philanthropies.
Radnor, Z., & Osborne, S. P. (2013). Lean: A failed theory for public services? Public Management Review, 15(2), 265–287.
Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Simon & Schuster.
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, 43(8), 842–868.
Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2013). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change (5th ed.). Chichester: Wiley.
Torfing, J., & Triantafillou, P. (2016). Enhancing public innovation by transforming public governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vangen, S., Hayes, J. P., & Cornforth, C. (2015). Governing cross-sector, inter-organizational collaborations. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1237–1260.
Vangen, S., & Winchester, N. (2014). Managing cultural diversity in collaborations: A focus on management tensions. Public Management Review, 16(5), 686–707.
Viladecans-Marsal, E., & Arauzo-Carod, J. (2012). Can a knowledge-based cluster be created? The case of the Barcelona 22@ district. Papers in Regional Science, 91(2), 377–400.
Walker, R. M. (2014). Internal and external antecedents of process innovation. Public Management Review, 16(1), 21–44.
Willem, A., & Lucidarme, S. (2014). Pitfalls and challenges for trust and effectiveness in collaborative networks. Public Management Review, 16(5), 733–760.
Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
Wise, R., Wegrich, K., & Lodge, M. (2014). Governance innovations. In Hertie School of Governance (Ed.), The governance report 2014 (pp. 77–109). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wynen, J., Verhoest, K., Ongaro, E., & Van Thiel, S. (2014). Innovation-oriented culture in the public sector: Do managerial autonomy and result control lead to innovation? Public Management Review, 16(1), 45–66.
Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research (5th ed.). London: Sage.
Ysa, T., Esteve, M., & Longo, F. (2013). Enhancing innovation in public organizations through public-private partnerships: The role of public managers. In C. Greve & G. A. Hodge (Eds.), Rethinking public-private partnerships: Strategies for turbulent times (pp. 98–113). London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Timeus, K. (2019). Passing the Buck? How Risk Behaviours Shape Collaborative Innovation. In: Bach, T., Wegrich, K. (eds) The Blind Spots of Public Bureaucracy and the Politics of Non-Coordination. Executive Politics and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76672-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76672-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76671-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76672-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)