Satisfaction with Leisure Trips: Findings from Ghent, Belgium

  • Jonas De Vos
Part of the Applying Quality of Life Research book series (BEPR)


Recently, studies have started analysing how people perceive their travel and how satisfied they are with it. This travel satisfaction − i.e., the mood during trips and the evaluation of these trips – can be affected by trip characteristics, such as the used travel mode and trip duration. In this study – analysing leisure trips of 1720 respondents living in the city of Ghent (Belgium) − we do not only look at the effect of trip characteristics on travel satisfaction, but also on the effects of travel-related attitudes and the residential location on travel satisfaction, both singly and each controlling for the other. The latter makes it possible to analyse whether people who live in their preferred neighbourhood based on travel preferences (e.g., car lovers living in suburban-type of neighbourhoods) are more satisfied than people who do not. Furthermore, this chapter also explores possible outcomes of travel satisfaction. It is possible that satisfying trips with a certain travel mode increase the chance of choosing that mode for future trips of the same kind, whether or not indirect through changes in attitudes. Repetitive positively or negatively perceived trips might also affect longer-term well-being, such as life satisfaction, both directly and indirectly through the performance of − and satisfaction with − activities at the destination of the trip. On the other hand, life satisfaction can also influence people’s satisfaction with short-term activity episodes, such as satisfaction with leisure trips and activities.


Travel behaviour Travel satisfaction Attitudes Well-being Residential location 



This research has been funded by the Research Foundation – Flanders (FWO), grant 12F2516N. The author would like to thank dr. Tim Schwanen, prof. Patricia L. Mokhtarian, dr. Veronique Van Acker and prof. Frank Witlox for their supervising role in the author’s doctoral research (De Vos 2015), on which this chapter is partly based.


  1. Aarts, H., Verplanken, B., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1998). Predicting behaviour from actions in the past: Repeated decision making or a matter of habit? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1355–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abou-Zeid, M., & Ben-Akiva, M. (2012). Well-being and activity-based models. Transportation, 39(6), 1189–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beirão, G., & Cabral, J. A. S. (2007). Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study. Transport Policy, 14(6), 478–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ben-Elia, E., Alexander, B., Hubers, C., & Ettema, D. (2014). Activity fragmentation, ICT and travel: An exploratory path analysis of spatiotemporal interrelationships. Transportation Research Part A, 68, 56–74.Google Scholar
  5. Bergstad, C. J., Gamble, A., Gärling, T., Hagman, O., Polk, M., Ettema, D., Friman, M., & Olsson, L. E. (2011). Subjective well-being related to satisfaction with daily travel. Transportation, 38(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao, X. (2012). The relationships between e-shopping and store shopping in the shopping process of search goods. Transportation Research Part A, 46(7), 993–1002.Google Scholar
  7. Cao, X., & Ettema, D. (2014). Satisfaction with travel and residential self-selection: How do preferences moderate the impact of the Hiawatha Light Rail Transit line? Journal of Transport and Land Use, 7(3), 93–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. City of Ghent. (2012). Buurtmonitor Gent. Last accessed August 2013.
  9. Currie, G., Richardson, T., Smyth, P., Vella-Brodrick, D., Hine, J., Lucas, K., Stanley, J. R., Morris, J., Kinnear, R., & Stanley, J. K. (2009). Investigating links between transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being in Melbourne – Preliminary results. Transport Policy, 16(3), 97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Vos, J. (2015). Travel satisfaction: Analysing the link between travel behaviour, residential location choice and well-being (Doctoral dissertation). Ghent University, Ghent.Google Scholar
  11. De Vos, J. (2018). Analysing the effect of trip satisfaction on satisfaction with the leisure activity at the destination of the trip, in relationship with life satisfaction. Transportation.
  12. De Vos, J., & Witlox, F. (2016). Do people live in urban neighbourhoods because they do not like to travel? Analysing an alternative residential self-selection hypothesis. Travel Behaviour and Society, 4, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Vos, J., & Witlox, F. (2017). Travel satisfaction revisited. On the pivotal role of travel satisfaction in conceptualising a travel behaviour process. Transportation Research Part A, 106, 364–373.Google Scholar
  14. De Vos, J., Derudder, B., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2012). Reducing car use: changing attitudes or relocating? The influence of residential dissonance on travel behavior. Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Vos, J., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2013). Travel and subjective well-being: A focus on findings, methods and future research needs. Transport Reviews, 33(4), 421–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. De Vos, J., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2015). How satisfying is the scale for travel satisfaction. Transportation Research Part F, 29, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Vos, J., Mokhtarian, P. L., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2016). Travel mode choice and travel satisfaction: bridging the gap between decision utility and experienced utility. Transportation, 43(5), 771–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Vos, J., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2018). Do satisfying walking and cycling trips result in more future trips with active travel modes? An exploratory study. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  19. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffen, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ettema, D., & Smajic, I. (2015). Walking, places and wellbeing. The Geographical Journal, 181(2), 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Olsson, L. E., & Friman, M. (2010). Out-of-home activities, daily travel, and subjective well-being. Transportation Research Part A, 44(9), 723–732.Google Scholar
  23. Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Eriksson, L., Friman, M., Olsson, L. E., & Fujii, S. (2011). Satisfaction with travel and subjective well-being: Development and test of a measurement tool. Transportation Research Part F, 14(3), 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Friman, M., Fujii, S., Ettema, D., Gärling, T., & Olsson, L. E. (2013). Psychometric analysis of the satisfaction with travel scale. Transportation Research Part A, 48, 132–145.Google Scholar
  25. Friman, M., Olsson, L. E., Ståhl, M., Ettema, D., & Gärling, T. (2017). Travel and residual emotional well-being. Transportation Research Part F, 49, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Groves, R. M. (1989). Survey errors and survey costs. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Handy, S. L., Cao, X., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005). Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transportation Research Part D, 10(6), 427–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jain, J., & Lyons, G. (2008). The gift of travel time. Journal of Transport Geography, 16, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kahneman, D., Wakker, P. P., & Sarin, R. (1997). Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 375–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Legrain, A., Eluru, N., & El-Geneidy, A. (2015). Am stressed, must travel: The relationship between mode choice and commuting stress. Transportation Research Part F, 34, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now? Transport Policy, 20, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mao, Z., Ettema, D., & Dijst, M. (2016). Commuting trip satisfaction in Beijing: Exploring the influence of multimodal behavior and modal flexibility. Transportation Research Part A, 94, 592–603.Google Scholar
  35. Mokhtarian, P. L., & Salomon, I. (2001). How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transportation Research Part A, 35(8), 695–719.Google Scholar
  36. Morris, E. A., & Guerra, E. (2015a). Are we there yet? Trip duration and mood during travel. Transportation Research Part F, 33, 38–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morris, E. A., & Guerra, E. (2015b). Mood and mode: Does how we travel affect how we feel? Transportation, 42(1), 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Olsson, L. E., Gärling, T., Ettema, D., Friman, M., & Fujii, S. (2013). Happiness and satisfaction with work commute. Social Indicators Research, 111(1), 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Páez, A., & Whalen, K. (2010). Enjoyment of commute: A comparison of different transportation modes. Transportation Research Part A, 44(7), 537–549.Google Scholar
  40. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 164–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reibstein, D. J., Lovelock, C. H., & Dobson, R. P. (1980). The direction of causality between perceptions, affect, and behavior: An application to travel behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 6(4), 370–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schwanen, T., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2005). What affects commute mode choice, neighbourhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods? Journal of Transport Geography, 13(1), 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. St-Louis, E., Manaugh, K., Van Lierop, D., & El-Geneidy, A. (2014). The happy commuter: A comparison of commuter satisfaction across modes. Transportation Research Part F, 26, 160–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Triandis, H. C. (1977). Interpersonal behaviour. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  45. Västfjäll, D., & Gärling, T. (2007). Validation of a Swedish short self-report measure. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 233–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Västfjäll, D., Friman, M., Gärling, T., & Kleiner, M. (2002). The measurement of core affect: A Swedish selfreport measure. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43(1), 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1997). Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27(5), 539–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ye, R., & Titheridge, H. (2017). Satisfaction with the commute: The role of travel mode choice, built environment and attitudes. Transportation Research Part D, 52B, 535–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geography DepartmentGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations