Advertisement

Quality of Life and Daily Travel: An Introduction

  • Lars E. Olsson
  • Margareta Friman
  • Dick Ettema
Part of the Applying Quality of Life Research book series (BEPR)

Abstract

In this chapter, we provide an introduction to the topic and a brief overview of Quality of Life and Daily Travel. A short background of why it is relevant to study travel and wellbeing, along with definitions and concepts related to quality of life research – such as objective and subjective outcomes, and hedonic and eudaimonic outcomes – will be followed by an overview of the chapters of the book arranged in three parts: theoretical perspectives and conceptualizations, case studies, and future directions. The aim of this book, Quality of Life and Daily Travel, is to compile current knowledge into one edited volume, where several areas of research are integrated – including traffic and transport psychology, transport planning and engineering, transport geography, transport economics, consumer services, and wellbeing research – in order to discuss the various facets of the links between travel and wellbeing. The importance of mobility, accessibility, experiences and emotions for the wellbeing of people will be highlighted.

Keywords

Daily travel Quality in life Life satisfaction Hedonic wellbeing Eudaimonic wellbeing Happiness Subjective wellbeing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial support provided to Margareta Friman and Lars E Olsson for their work on this chapter was obtained through grant #43210-1 from the Swedish Energy Agency.

References

  1. Adler, A., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2016). Using wellbeing for public policy: Theory, measurement, and recommendations. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(1), 1–35.  https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v6i1.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson, E., Malmberg, B., & Östh, J. (2012). Travel-to-school distances in Sweden 2000–2006: changing school geography with equality implications. Journal of Transport Geography, 23, 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Axhausen, K., & Gärling, T. (1992). Activity-based approaches to travel analysis: Conceptual frameworks, models, and research problems. Transport Reviews, 12, 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Compton, W. C., Smith, M. L., Cornish, K. A., & Qualls, D. L. (1996). Factor structure of mental health measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Vos, J., Schwanen, T., Van Acker, V., & Witlox, F. (2013). Travel and subjective well-being: A focus on findings, methods and future research needs. Transport Reviews, 33, 421–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delbosc, A., & Currie, G. (2011). The spatial context of transport disadvantage, social exclusion and well-being. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1130–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy: A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29, 94–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dolan, P., Layard, R., & Metcalfe, R. (2011). Measuring subjective well-being for public policy. London: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  13. Ettema, D., Gärling, T., Olsson, L. E., & Friman, M. (2010). Out-of-home activities, daily travel, and subjective well-being. Transportation Research Part A, 44, 723–732.Google Scholar
  14. Ettema, D., Friman, M., & Gärling, T. (2014). Overview of handbook on sustainable travel. In T. Gärling, D. Ettema, & M. Friman (Eds.), Handbook of sustainable travel. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Ettema, D., Friman, M., Gärling, T., & Olsson, L. E. (2016). Travel mode use, travel mode shift and subjective well-being: Overview of theories, empirical findings and policy implications. In D. Wang & S. He (Eds.), Mobility, sociability and wellbeing of urban living. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Eurostat. (2015). Quality of life: Facts and views (p. 2015). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  17. Frändberg, L., & Vilhelmson, B. (2011). More or less travel: Personal mobility trends in the Swedish population focusing gender and cohort. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1235–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friman, M., Olsson, L. E., Ettema, D., & Gärling, T. (2017a). How does travel affect emotional well-being and life satisfaction? Transport Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 106, 170–180.Google Scholar
  19. Friman, M., Olsson, L. E., Ståhl, M., Ettema, D., & Gärling, T. (2017b). Travel and residual emotional well-being. Transportation Research Part F: Transport Psychology and Behaviour, 49, 159–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Helliwell, J., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. (Eds.). (2012). World happiness report. New York: The Earth Institute, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  21. Jakobsson Bergstad, C., Gamble, A., Hagman, O., Polk, M., Gärling, T., Ettema, D., Friman, M., & Olsson, L. E. (2011). Influences of affect associated with routine out-of-home activities on subjective well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 7, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones, P. M., Dix, M. C., Clarke, I., & Heggie, I. G. (1983). Understanding travel behaviour. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  23. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K. M., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9, 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McMahon, D. M. (2008). The pursuit of happiness in history. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 80–93). New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mokhtarian, P. L., & Salomon, I. (2001). How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 35, 695–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mokhtarian, P. L., Salomon, I., & Redmond, L. S. (2001). Understanding the demand for travel: It’s not purely ‘derived’. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 14(4), 355–380.Google Scholar
  27. Nordbakke, S., & Schwanen, T. (2014). Well-being and mobility: A theoretical framework and literature review focusing on older people. Mobilities, 9(1), 104–129.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2013.784542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. OECD. (2013). OECD guidelines on measuring subjective well-being. Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264191655-en.
  29. Oishi, S., Diener, E. F., Lucas, R. E., & Suh, E. M. (1999). Cross-cultural variations in predictors of life satisfaction: Perspectives from needs and values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 980–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Olsson, L. E., Gärling, T., Ettema, D., Friman, M., & Fujii, S. (2013). Happiness and satisfaction with work commute. Social Indicators Research, 111, 255–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pavot, W. (2008). The assessment of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 124–167). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  32. Pychyl, T. A., & Little, B. R. (1998). Dimensional specificity in the prediction of subjective well-being: personal projects in pursuit of the Phd. Social Indicators Research, 45, 423–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 141–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schimmack, U. (2008). The structure of subjective well-being. In M. Eid & R. J. Larsen (Eds.), The science of subjective well-being (pp. 97–123). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  35. Schimmack, U., & Oishi, S. (2005). The influence of chronically and temporarily accessible information on life satisfaction judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. UN General Assembly Resolution A/65/309. Happiness: Towards a holistic approach to development. Retrieved from http://www5.cao.go.jp/keizai2/koufukudo/shiryou/5shiryou/s-1.pdf
  37. United Nations (UN). (2015). World population ageing. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  38. Veenhoven, R. (1984). Conditions of happiness. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  39. Veenhoven, R. (2016). Happiness: History of the concept. In J. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (pp. 521–525). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  40. Waterman, A. S., Schwartz, S. J., & Conti, R. (2008). The implications of two conceptions of happiness (hedonic enjoyment and eudaimonia) for the understanding of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 41–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars E. Olsson
    • 1
  • Margareta Friman
    • 1
  • Dick Ettema
    • 2
  1. 1.CTF Service Research Center, Department of Social and Psychological StudiesKarlstad UniversityKarlstadSweden
  2. 2.Department of Human Geography and Spatial PlanningUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations