Subjected to the Free Market: The Subject of Existential Freedom

  • Peter Bloom
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter investigates how capitalism turns individuals into “subject-objects”, combining our economic objectification to market demands with the possibility to choose from a range of market-friendly identities. It begins by highlighting Sartre’s belief presented in Part II of “Being and Nothingness” that individuals are denied their existential freedom by turning themselves into socialized objects whose only purpose is to fulfil their given cultural role. The French theorist Foucault, for his part, notes how this subjection to being a mere object of capitalism (or any social system) is offset and ultimately reinforced through processes of subjectification in which we are made into conscious and intentional subjects. A new philosophy of existential freedom would, hence, emphasize the overriding importance of reducing this alienation, providing us the material resources and subjective tools to freely produce our own selves and society.

References

  1. Althusser, L. (1971). For Marx. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  2. Bevir, M. (1999). Foucault and Critique: Deploying Agency Against Autonomy. Political Theory, 27(1), 65–84.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591799027001004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Biebricher, T. (2015). Neoliberalism and Democracy. Constellations, 22(2), 255–266.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blomgren, A.-M. (1997). Nyliberal politisk fi losofi. En kritisk analys av Milton Friedman, Robert Nozick och F. A. Hayek. Nora: Bokförlaget Nya Doxa. Quoted in Thorsen, D. E. 2010. The neoliberal challenge. What is neoliberalism? Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 2(2), 188–214.Google Scholar
  5. Bloom, P. (2015). Cutting Off the King’s Head: The Self-Disciplining Fantasy of Neoliberal Sovereignty. New Formations, 88, 11–29.Google Scholar
  6. Bloom, P. (2017). The Ethics of Neoliberalism: The Business of Making Capitalism Moral. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  7. Bloom, P., & Rhodes, C. (2016). Political Leadership in the 21st Century: NeoLiberalism and the Rise of the CEO Politician. In J. Storey, J. Hartley, P. Denis, P. Hart, & D. Ulrich (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Leadership (pp. 359–372). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bloom, P., & Rhodes, C. (2018). The CEO Society: The Corporate Takeover of Everyday Life. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  9. Butler, J. (1997). The Psychic Life of Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Davies, W. (2014). The Limits of Neoliberalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Davies, W. (2015). The Happiness Industry. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Eskes, T., Duncan, M., & Miller, E. (1998). The Discourse of Empowerment: Foucault, Marcuse, and Women’s Fitness Texts. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 22(3), 317–344.  https://doi.org/10.1177/019372398022003006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fiet, J. (2001). The Theoretical Side of Teaching Entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(1), 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0883-9026(99)00041-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punishment. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1982). The Subject and Power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795.  https://doi.org/10.1086/448181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (1988). The Ethic of Care for the Self as a Practice of Freedom: An Interview with Michel Foucault on January 20, 1984 in the fi nal Foucault: Studies on Michel Foucault’s Last Works. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 12(2–3), 112–131.Google Scholar
  19. Foucault, M. (1990). Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings, 1977–1984. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault Effect. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, M. (1997). What Is the Enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth (Vol. 1). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  22. Fourcade, M., & Healy, K. (2007). Moral Views of Market Society. Annual Review of Sociology, 33(1), 285–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Friedman, M. (2009). Capitalism and Freedom. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
  24. Gane, M. (2008). Foucault on Governmentality and Liberalism. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kreft, S. F., & Sobel, R. S. (2005). Public Policy, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Freedom. Cata Journal, 25, 595.Google Scholar
  26. Latham, R. (2000). Social Sovereignty. Theory, Culture & Society, 17(4), 1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1177/02632760022051284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levi-Faur, D., & Jordana, J. (2005). The Rise of Regulatory Capitalism: The Global Diffusion of a New Order. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1), 200–217.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204273623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lukacs, G. (1971). History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  29. Martel, J. (2017). The Misinterpellated Subject. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. May, T. (2005). To Change the World, to Celebrate Life: Merleau-Ponty and Foucault on the Body. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 31(5–6), 517–531.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0191453705055487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McNay, L. (2013). Foucault and Feminism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Merchant, B. (2015). Fully Automated luxury Communism. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  33. O’Malley, P. (1996). Risk and Responsibility. In A. Barry, T. Osbourne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and Political Reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. O’Neil, C. (2017). Weapons of Math Destruction. New York: B/D/W/Y Broadway Books.Google Scholar
  35. O’Sullivan, S. (2010). Lacan’s Ethics and Foucault’s Care of the Self’: Two Diagrams of the Production of Subjectivity (and of the Subject’s Relation to Truth). Parrhesia, 10, 51–73.Google Scholar
  36. Ortner, S. (1995). Resistance and the Problem of Ethnographic Refusal. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 37(1), 173.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0010417500019587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pease, B. (2002). Rethinking Empowerment: A Postmodern Reappraisal for Emancipatory Practice. British Journal of Social Work, 32(2), 135–147.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/32.2.135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pofeldt, E. (2014). Entrepreneurship Is the Ticket to Freedom. Forbes.Google Scholar
  39. Rebughini, P. (2014). Subject, Subjectivity, Subjectivation. Sociopedia.Google Scholar
  40. Reich, R. (2009). How Capitalism Is Killing Democracy. Foreign Policy.Google Scholar
  41. Rhodes, C., & Bloom, P. (2012). The Cultural Fantasy of Hierarchy: Sovereignty and the Desire for Spiritual Purity. In Reinventing Hierarchy and Bureaucracy–from the Bureau to Network Organizations (pp. 141–169). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roberts, J. (2005). The Power of the ‘Imaginary’ in Disciplinary Processes. Organization, 12(5), 619–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rose, J., O’Malley, P., & Valverde, M. (2006). Governmentality. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2(1), 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rouse, J. (2005). Power/Knowledge. In G. Gutting (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Foucault (pp. 95–112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sartre, J. (1956). Being and Nothingness. New York: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  46. Sawicki, J. (2005). Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, Power, and the Body. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Simons, J. (1995). Foucault & the Political. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Thanem, T. (2011). The Monstrous Organization. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thorsen, D. (2010). The Neoliberal Challenge: What Is Neoliberalism? Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 2(2), 188–214.Google Scholar
  50. Tie, W. (2004). The Psychic Life of Governmentality. Culture, Theory and Critique, 45(2), 161–176.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1473578042000283844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Bloom
    • 1
  1. 1.Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations