Work-Family Border Styles and Mobile Technology

  • Mia TammelinEmail author
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research book series (BRIEFSWELLBEING)


Technological innovations and particularly mobile technology have many, complex implications for social life. All in all, mobile technology creates a paradox for employed parents: mobile phones enable better coordination and lower parents’ anxiety over family routines, yet the use of mobile technology increases the need for multitasking and increases the emotional burden of managing multiple roles. It is important to identify differences between workers as not everyone is able to use the possibilities of constant connectivity. This chapter addresses two interlinked topics: first, the possibility for employed parents to occupy different social domains concurrently with mobile technology and second, how permeable the border is between work and home. The chapter uses work–family border theory as a framework for analysing these micro-mechanisms of daily life. Besides a research review, this chapter uses qualitative data (collected in 2016; n = 39) on working parents.


Work-Family borders Work-Family interface Content analysis ICT Self-management 


  1. Allen, T. D., & Shockley, K. (2009). Flexible work arrangements: Help or hype. In: D. R. Crane & E. J. Hill (Eds.), Handbook of families and work: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 265–284). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, T. D., Cho, E., & Meier, L. L. (2014). Work—family boundary dynamics. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashforth, B., Kreiner, G., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25, 472–491.Google Scholar
  4. Bellavia, G., & Frone, M. (2005). Work-family conflict. In J. Barling, E. K. Kelloway, & M. Frone (Eds.), Handbook of work stress (pp. 113, 147). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  5. Berkowsky, RW. (2013). When you just cannot get away. Exploring the use of information and communication technologies in facilitating negative work/home spillover. Information, Communication Society, 16(4), 519–541.Google Scholar
  6. Brannen, J., O’Connell, R., & Mooney, A. (2013). Families, meals and synchronicity: eating together in British dual earner families. Community, Work & Family, 16(4), 417–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carreri, A. (2015). Italian parents in precarious work: How normative beliefs affect social understandings of the work-family boundary. In S. Ammons & E. Kelly (Eds.) Work and family in the new economy. Research in sociology of work (Vol. 26, pp. 1–33). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  8. Chesley, N. (2005). Blurring boundaries? Linking technology use, spillover, individual distress, and family satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1237–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chesley, N. (2010). Technology use and employee assessments of productivity, workload, and pace of life. Information, Communication & Society, 13(4), 485–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chesley, N., & Johnson, B. (2010). Information and communication technology, work, and family. In S. Sweet & J. Casey (Eds.), Work and family encyclopedia. Cestnut Hill, MA: Sloan Work and Family Research Network.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cortada, J. (1999). Rise of the knowledge worker. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  13. Cousins, K., & Robey, D. (2015). Managing work-life boundaries with mobile technologies: An interpretive study of mobile work practices. Information Technology & People, 28(1), 34–71.
  14. Derks, D., van Duin D., Tims M., & Bakker A. (2015). Smartphone use and work–home interference: The moderating role of social norms and employee work engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(1), 155–177.
  15. Derks, D., Bakker, A., Peters, P., & van Wingerden, P. (2016). Work-related smartphone use, work-family conflict and family role performance: The role of segmentation preference. Human Relations, 36(5), 1045–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duxbury, L., & Higgins, C. (2005). Report 4: Who is at risk? Predictions of work-life conflict. Ottawa: Public Health Agency of Canada.Google Scholar
  17. Fagan, C., Lyonette, C., Smith, M., & Saldaña-Tejeda, A. (2012). The influence of working time arrangements on work-life integration or ‘balance’: A review of the international evidence. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  18. Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict. Testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(1), 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frone, M., Russel, M., & Cooper, L. M. (1997). Relation of work-family conflict to health outcomes: A four-year longitudinal study of employed parents. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 70(4), 325–336.Google Scholar
  20. Garcia-Montes, J., Caballero-Munoz, D., & Perez-Alvarez, M. (2006). Changes in the self resulting from the use of mobile phones. Media, Culture and Society, 28(1), 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greenhaus, J., & Powell, G. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 72–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoeven, Ter Vlaartje, van Zoonen, Ward, & Fonner, Kathryn. (2016). The practical paradox of technology: The influence of communication technology use on employee burnout and engagement. Communication Monographs, 83(2), 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hsieh, H.-S., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kinnunen, U., & Mauno, S. (1998). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict among employed women and men in Finland. Human Relations, 51(2), 157–177.Google Scholar
  25. Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., Mauno, S., & Rantanen, J. (2010). Interface between work and family: A longitudinal individual and crossover perspective. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1), 119–137.
  26. Kinnunen, U., Rantanen, J., de Bloom, J., Mauno, S., Feldt, T., & Korpela, K. (2016). Työn ominaisuuksien merkitys työn ja yksityiselämän välisen rajan hallinnassa. Työelämän tutkimus, 14(3), 209–222.Google Scholar
  27. Kossek, E., & Lambert, S. (2005). Introduction: Work-Family Scholarship: Voice & Context. In E. E. Kossek, & S. Lambert (Eds.), Work and Life Integration: Organizational, Cultural and Psychological Perspectives (pp. 3–18). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (LEA) Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kossek, E., Lautsch, B., & Eaton, S. (2006). Telecomuting, control, and boundary management: Correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work-family effectiveness. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 347–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kossek, E. E., Noe, R. A., & DeMarr, B. J. (1999). Work–family role synthesis: Individual and organizational determinants. International Journal of Conflict Management, 10, 102–129.Google Scholar
  30. Kossek, E., Ruderman, M., Braddy, P., & Hannum, K. (2012). Work-nonwork boundary management profiles: A person-centered approach. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 81(1), 112–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lanigan, J. (2009). A sociotechnological model for family research and intervention: How information and communication technologies affect family life. Journal Marriage & Family Review, 45(6–8: Families and Communication), 587–609.Google Scholar
  32. Lewis, S. (2001). Restructuring workplace cultures: The ultimate work-family challenge? Women in Management Review, 16(1), 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ling, R., & Lai, C.-H. (2016). Microcoordination 2.0: Social coordination in the age of smartphones and messaging apps. Journal of Communication, 66(5), 834–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nippert-Eng, C. E. (1995). Home and work. Negotiating boundaries through everyday life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. O’ Carroll, A. (2008). Fuzzy holes and intangible time. Time in a knowledge industry. Time & Society, 17(2/3), 179–193.Google Scholar
  36. Ollier-Malaterre, A., Rothbard, N. P., & Berg, J. M. (2013). When worlds collide in cyperspace: How boundary work in online social networks impacts professional relationships. Academy of Management Review, 38(4), 645–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & Boswell, W. R. (2006). Blurring boundaries: Correlates of integration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 432–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Radesky, J. S., Kistin, C., Eisenberg, S., Gross, J., Block, G., Zuckerman, B., et al. (2016). Parent perspectives on their mobile technology use: The excitement and exhaustion of parenting while connected. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 37(9), 694–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rothbard, N. P., Phillips, K. W., & Dumas, T. L. (2005). Managing multiple roles: Work-family policies and individuals’ desires for segmentation. Organization Science, 16(3), 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rubery, J., Keizer, A., & Grimshaw, D. (2016). Flexibility bites back: The multiple and hidden costs of flexible employment policies. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(3), 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ruppanner, L. (2013). Conflict between work and family: An investigation of four policy measures. Social Indicators Research, 10(1), 327–346.
  42. Tammelin, M., Saari T., & Koivunen T. (2017). Illusion of autonomy? Knowledge workers pressed between home and work. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 37(9/10), 591–604.
  43. Tammelin, M., & Mustosmäki, A. (2017). Työn, perheen ja muun elämän yhteensovittaminen. In: P. Pyöriä (Ed.) Myytit työelämässä (pp. 113–129). Helsinki: Gaudeamus.Google Scholar
  44. Wajcman, J. (2015). Pressed for time: The acceleration of life in digital capitalism. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Sciences and PhilosophyUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations