The Intensification of Work

  • Armi Mustosmäki
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research book series (BRIEFSWELLBEING)


Work intensity has become an increasingly vital concept in understanding current changes in the employment sector, and why these changes have detrimental implications for the well-being of employees and their families. Objective measures, such as allocation or length of work hours, do not necessarily catch the tempo of work during the time spent at work. Nor are the hours an appropriate indicator of the level of mental effort and strain in and even outside of (official) work (hours). This chapter discusses the various change processes in the economy and work life that have led to the intensification of work. The chapter’s aim is also to describe how these change processes pose varying challenges for women and men in different socio-economic positions.


Effort Hurriedness Work tempo Public sector work Part-time work 


  1. Batt, R., & Valcour, P. M. (2003). Human resource practices as predictors of work-family outcomes and employee turnover. Industrial Relations, 42, 189–220.Google Scholar
  2. Barley, S. R., Meyerson, D. E., & Grodal, S. (2011). E-mail as a source and symbol of stress. Organization Science, 22(4), 887–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, L., & Freman, R. B. (2001). The incentive for working hard: Explaining hours worked differences in the US and Germany. Labour Economics, 8(2), 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braverman, H. (1998). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. Published in 1974. New York: Monthly Review Press. Google Scholar
  5. Brunsson, N., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2000). Constructing organizations: The example of public sector reform. Organization Studies, 21(4), 721–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burchell, et al. (2009). Working conditions in the European Union: Working time and work intensity. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  7. Crompton, R., & Jones, G. A. (1984). White-collar proletariat: Deskilling and gender in clerical work. UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, R. C. (1979). Contested terrain. The Transformation of the Workforce in the Twentieth Century. USA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Eurofound. (2012). Fifth European Working Conditions Survey. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  10. Eurofound. (2016). Sixth European Working Conditions Survey—Overview report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  11. Eurofound. (2017a). Non-standard forms of employment: Recent trends and future prospects. Dublin: Eurofound.Google Scholar
  12. Eurofound. (2017b). Working time patterns for sustainable work. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  13. Fernández-Macías, F., Hurley, J., & Storrie, D. (2012). Transformation of the employment structure in the EU and USA, 1995–2007. Basingstone: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Flecker, J., Fibich, T., & Kraemer, K. (2017). Socio-economic changes and the reorganization of work. In C. Korunka & B. Kubicek (Eds.), Job demands in a changing world of work. Impact on workers’ health and performance and implications for research and practice. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Gallie, D. (2005). Work pressure in Europe 1996–2001: Trends and determinants. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(3), 351–375.Google Scholar
  16. Gallie, D. (2007). Production regimes, employment regimes and the quality of work. In D. Gallie (Ed.), Employment regimes and the quality of work (pp. 1–33). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallie, D., & Zhou, Y. (2013). Job control, work intensity, and work stress. In D. Gallie (Ed.), Economic crisis, quality of work, and social integration: the european experience (pp. 115–141). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gallie, D. (2015). Class inequality at work: Trends to polarization? In A. Felstead, D. Gallie, & F. Green (Eds.), Unequal Britain at work (pp. 22–41). Oxford: Oxford university press.Google Scholar
  19. Gimenez-Nadal, J. I., & Sevilla, A. (2012). Trends in time allocation: A cross-country analysis. European Economic Review, 56(6), 1338–1359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glasberg, A., Eriksson, S., & Norberg. (2007). Burnout and ‘stress of conscience’ among healthcare personnel. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 57(4), 392–403.Google Scholar
  21. Goodin, E. R., Rice, J. M., Bittman, M., & Saunders, P. (2005). The time-pressure illusion—Discretionary time vs. free time. Social Indicators Research, 73, 43–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Green, F. (2001). It’s been a hard day’s night: The concentration and intensification of work in late twentieth-century Britain. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 39(1), 53–80.Google Scholar
  23. Green, F., & McIntosh, S. (2001). The Intensification of work in Europe. Labour Economics, 8(2), 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Green, F. (2006). Demanding work. The paradox of job quality in the affluent economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Green, F. (2008). Work effort and worker well-being in the age of affluence. In R. Burke & C. Cooper (Eds.), The long work hours culture: Causes, consequences and choices (pp. 115–136). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Green, F., Felstead, A., Gallie, D., & Henseke, G. (2016). Skills and work organisation in Britain: A quarter century of change. Journal for Labour Market Research, 49(2), 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grimshaw, D., & Figuereido, (2012). Women’s changing job structure in Europe: Patterns of job concentration, low pay and welfare state employment. In E. Fernández-Macías, J. Hurley, & D. Storrie, D. (Eds.), Transformation of the employment structure in the EU and USA. 1995–2007 (pp. 75–110). Basingstone: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  28. Hakim, C. (1997). A sociological perspective on part-time work. In H.-P. Blossfeld & C. Hakim (Eds.), Between equalization and marginalization: Women working part-time in Europe and the United States of America (pp. 22–70). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hamermesh, D., & Lee, J. (2007). Stressed out on four continents: Time crunch or yuppie kvetch? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(2), 374–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Handel, M. (2005). Trends in perceived job quality, 1989 to 1998. Work and occupations, 32(1), 66–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hall, P. (2013). NPM in Sweden: The risky balance between bureaucracy and politics. In Å. Sandberg (Ed.), Nordic lights: Work, management and welfare in Scandinavia (pp. 406–419). Stockholm: SNS Förlag.Google Scholar
  32. Hebdon, R., & Kirkpatrick, I. (2005). Changes in the organization of public services and their effect on employment relations. In S. Ackroyd, R. Batt, & P. Thompson, & P. Tolbert (Eds.), Oxford handbook of work and organization (pp. 530–553). New York: Oxford University press.Google Scholar
  33. Hirvonen, H. (2014). Habitus and care: Investigating welfare service workers’ agency. (Doctoral dissertation) Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research, 497. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
  34. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  35. Holm, J. R., & Lorenz, E. (2015). Has “Discretionary Learning” declined during the Lisbon Agenda? A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of work organization in European nations. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(6), 1179–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jacobs, J. A., & Gerson, K. (2004). The time divide: Work, family, and gender inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Järnefelt, N., & Lehto, A. M. (2002). Työhulluja vai hulluja töitä? Tutkimus kiirekokemuksesta työpaikoilla. Statistics Finland.Google Scholar
  38. Kalleberg, A. (2011). Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  39. Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2010). Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work. Human Relations, 63(1), 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lott, Y., & Chung, H. (2016). Gender discrepancies in the outcomes of schedule control on overtime hours and income in Germany. European Sociological Review, 32(6), 752–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McGinnity, F., & Calvert, E. (2009). Work-Life Conflict and Social Inequality in Western Europe. Social Indicators Research, 93, 489–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Meagher, G., & Szebehely, M. (Eds.). (2013). Marketisation in Nordic eldercare: A research report on legislation, oversight, extent and consequences. Stockholm: Stockholm University. (Stockholm Studies in Social Work 30).Google Scholar
  43. Movitz, F., & Sandberg, Å. (2013). Contested models: Productive welfare and solidaristic individualism. In Å. Sandberg (Ed.), Nordic lights: Work, management and welfare in Scandinavia (pp. 31–90). Stockholm: SNS Förlag.Google Scholar
  44. Mustosmäki, A., Anttila, T., Oinas, T., & Nätti, J. (2011). Job quality trends in Europe—Implications for work-life balance. In Work-life balance in Europe (pp. 17–41). UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  45. Mustosmäki, A., Oinas, T., & Anttila, T. (2017). Abating inequalities? Job quality at the intersection of class and gender in Finland 1977–2013. Acta Sociologica, 60(3), 228–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mänttäri-van der Kuip, M. (2015). Work-related well-being among Finnish frontline social workers in an age of austerity. Doctoral dissertation. Jyväskylä studies in education, psychology and social research 524. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
  47. Niemistö, C., Karjalainen, M., & Hearn, J. (2017). “Pakko painaa pitkää päivää” Työn ja muun elämän väliset hämärtyvät rajat tietotyössä. In M. Helander, I. Levä, & S. Saksela-Bergholm (Eds.), Työaikakirja (pp. 147–170). Finland: Into-kustannus.Google Scholar
  48. Parent-Thirion, A., Fernández Macías, E., Hurley, J., & Vermeylen, G. (2007). Fourth European working conditions survey. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  49. Piasna, A., & Plagnol, A. (2017). Women’s job quality across family life stages: An analysis of female employees across 27 European Countries. Social Indicators Research, advance access. Scholar
  50. Rosa, H. (2003). Social acceleration—Ethical and political consequences of a desynchronised high-speed society. Constellations, 10, 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity. USA: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Russell, H., O’Connell, P., & McGinnity, F. (2009). The impact of flexible working arrangements on work–life conflict and work pressure in Ireland. Gender, Work & Organization, 16(1), 73–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Russell, H., & McGinnity, F. (2014). Under pressure: The impact of recession on employees in Ireland. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 52(2), 286–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Selberg, R. (2013). Nursing in times of neoliberal change: An ethnographic study of nurses’ experiences of work intensification. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 3(2), 9–35.
  55. Sutela, H., & Lehto, A.-M. (2014). Työolojen muutokset 1977–2013 [Changes in the working conditions 1977-2013]. Helsinki: Statistics Finland.Google Scholar
  56. Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. New York, NY, USA and London, UK: Harper & Brothers. Available online via Project Gutenberg.Google Scholar
  57. Taylor, P., Hyman, J., Mulvey, G., & Bain, P. (2002). Work organization, control and the experience of work in call centres. Work, Employment & Society, 16(1), 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Trydegård, G. (2012). Care work in changing welfare states: Nordic care workers’ experiences. European Journal of Ageing, 9(2), 119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tufte, P. (2013). Is there time enough? Temporal resources and service performance in the Danish home care sector. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 3(2), 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Viljanen, O., & Toivanen, M. (2017). Kadonnutta aikaa etsimässä: asiantuntijoiden ajanhallinta sidoksisessa työssä. In M. Helander, I. Levä, & S. Saksela-Bergholm. (Eds.), Työaikakirja. Finland: Into-kustannus.Google Scholar
  61. Wajcman, J. (2015). Pressed for time. USA: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  62. Walsh, J. (2007). Experiencing part-time work: Temporal tensions, social relations and the work-family interface. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 45(1), 155–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Warren, T. (2004). Working part-time: Achieving a successful work life balance. British Journal of Sociology, 55, 99–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Warren, T. (2015). Work-time underemployment and financial hardship: class inequalities and recession in the UK. Work, Employment & Society, 29(2), 191–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social Sciences and PhilosophyUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations