Lone-Parent Families in Europe

Part of the SpringerBriefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research book series (BRIEFSWELLBEING)


The increase of lone-parent families is a common phenomenon across Europe. Lone parent families have been the focus of extensive research as these families are in a vulnerable position in society. In this chapter we firstly explore the proportion of lone-parent families across the European Union; secondly, the employment patterns of lone parents; and thirdly, we look at the employment rate by education of the lone parent in lone-parent families in the European Union. This study stems from the realization that there is a need to learn more about the situation of lone parents and to characterize their heterogeneity. Low socio-economic status might be connected with low income, work that is low skilled and working during non-standard hours, while a high socio-economic position might be linked with a good income, autonomous work and working time that enables a better work–family interface.


European Union Lone parents Poverty risk 


  1. Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality. What can be done? Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anttila, T., Oinas, T., Tammelin, M., & Nätti, J. (2015). Working-time regimes and work-life balance in Europe. European Sociological Review, 31(6), 713–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bianchi, S. M., & Milkie, M. A. (2010). Work and Family Research in the First Decade of the 21st Century. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 705–725.  DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00726.x
  4. Boca, D., & Mancini, L. (2016). Child poverty and child well-being in Italy in a comparative framework. In A. M. Mínguez (Ed.), Family well-being. European perspectives (pp. 55–73). Springer Science + Business Media. Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Chzhen, Y., & Bradshaw, J. (2012). Lone parents, poverty and policy in the European Union. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(5), 487–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ciabattari, T. (2007). Single mothers, social capital, and work-family conflict. Journal of Family Issues, 28(1), 34–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daly, K. J. (2001). Deconstructing family time: From ideology to lived experience. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Damaske, A., Bratter, J. L., & Frech, A. (2017). Single mother families and employment, race, and poverty in changing economic times. Social Science Research, 62, 120–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eurofound (European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions). (2017). In-work poverty in the EU. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  10. Eurostat. (2011). EU legislation on the 2011 population and housing censuses. Explanatory notes. Eurostat methodologies and working notes. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available online. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5916677/KS-RA-11-006-EN.PDF/5bec0655-4a55-466d-9a00-fabe83d54649?version=1.0. Accessed 31 July 2017.
  11. Eurostat (Census hub HC52). (2011). People in the EU: Who are we and how do we live? Selected analyses focusing on the 2011 population and housing census.Google Scholar
  12. Forss, A., & Säkkinen, S. (2017). Lapsen elatus ja huolto 2016. The National Institute for Health and Welfare, Official Statistics. http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/134802/tr23_17.pdf.
  13. Golombok, S., & Tasker, F. (2011). Socioemotional development in changing families. In R. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (pp. 1–45). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Golombok, S., Zadeh, S., Imrie, S., Smith, V., & Freeman, T. (2016). Single mothers by choice: Mother-child relationships and children’s psychological adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(4), 409–418.  https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gornick, J. C., & Jäntti, M. (2012). Child poverty in cross-national perspective: Lessons from the Luxembourg income study. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(3), 558–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gubernskaya, Z. (2010). Changing attitudes toward marriage and children in six countries. Sociological Perspectives, 53(2), 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haataja, A. (2009). Kuka on yksinhuoltaja? Yksinhuoltajien määrä ja profiili eri aineistojen valossa. In K. Forssen, A. Haataja, & M. Hakovirta (Eds.), Yksinhuoltajuus Suomessa. Väestöntutkimuslaitoksen julkaisu-sarja (pp. 46–62). Helsinki: Väestöliitto.Google Scholar
  18. Hakovirta, M. (2008). Yksinhuoltajaäitien palkkatyövalinnat. Sosiologia, 2, 91–103.Google Scholar
  19. Hakovirta, M., Kallio, J., & Salin, M. (2017). Can one parent bring up a child as well as two parents together? Multilevel analysis of attitudes towards lone parents in 22 welfare states. Paper Presented at ESPAnet Conference, Lisbon, September 14th–16th 2017.Google Scholar
  20. Kim, J. W., & Choi, Y. J. (2013). Feminisation of poverty in 12 welfare states: Consolidating cross-regime variations? International Journal of Social Welfare, 22(4), 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krok, S. (2009). Hyviä äitejä ja arjen pärjääjiä - yksinhuoltajia marginaalissa. Tampere: Acta Universitatis Tamperensis.Google Scholar
  22. Kröger, T. (2009). Yksinhuoltajuus ja isyys: outo yhdistelmä? In K. Forssen, A. Haataja, & M. Hakovirta (Eds.), Yksinhuoltajuus Suomessa. Väestöntutkimuslaitoksen julkaisu-sarja (pp. 170–185). Helsinki: Väestöliitto.Google Scholar
  23. Kröger, T. (2010). Lone mothers and the puzzles of daily life: Do care regimes really matter? International Journal of Social Welfare, 19(4), 390–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maldonado, L. (2017). Doing better for single-parent families: Poverty and policy across 45 countries. UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Available online: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/49w2b8gg.
  25. Maldonado, L., & Nieuwenhuis, R. (2015). Family policies and single parent poverty in 18 OECD countries, 1978–2008. Community, Work & Family, 18(4), 395–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McLanahan, S. (2004). Diverging destinies: How children are faring under the second demographic transition. Demography, 41(4), 607–627.  https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2004.0033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moilanen, S., May, V., Räikkönen, E., Sevón, E., & Laakso, M.-L. (2016). Mothers’ non-standard working and childcare-related challenges: A comparison between lone and coupled mothers. International Journal of Sociology and Social policy, 36(1/2), 36–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Morgan, D. H. J. (2011). Rethinking family practices. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Murtorinne-Lahtinen, M., Moilanen, S., Tammelin, M., Rönkä, A., & Laakso, M.-L. (2016). Mothers’ non-standard working schedules and family time: Enhancing regularity and togetherness. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 36(1/2), 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nieuwenhuis, R., & Maldonado, L. C. (Eds.). (2018). The triple bind of single-parent families: Resources, employment and policies to improve well-being. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  31. OECD. (2017). Family database http://www.oecd.org/els/family/database.htm. Accessed 15 August 2017.
  32. Rousou, E., Kouta, C., Middleton, N., & Karanikola, M. (2013). Single mothers’ self-assessment of health: A systematic exploration of the literature. International Nursing Review, 60(4), 425–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Treas, J., Lui, J., & Gubernskaya, Z. (2014). Attitudes on marriage and new relationships: Cross-national evidence on the deinstitutionalization of marriage. Demographic Research, 30, 1495–1526.  https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2014.30.54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Lancker, W., Ghysels, J., & Cantillon, B. (2015). The impact of child benefits on single mother poverty: Exploring the role of targeting in 15 European countries. International Journal of Social Welfare, 24(3), 210–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Verhoef, M., Tammelin, M., May, V., Rönkä, A., & Roeters, A. (2015). Childcare and parental work schedules: a comparison of childcare arrangements among Finnish, British and Dutch dual-earner families. Community, Work & Family, 19(3), 261–280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2015.1024609.
  36. Weckström, S. (2012). Self-assessed consequences of unemployment on individual wellbeing and family relationships: A study of unemployed women and men in Finland. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(4), 372–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zagel, H., & Hübgen, S. (2018). A life course approach to single mothers’ economic wellbeing in different welfare states. In R. Nieuwenhuis & L. Maldonado (Eds.), The triple bind of single-parent families. Policy Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mia Tammelin
    • 1
  • Ilkka Virmasalo
    • 1
  • Outi Alakärppä
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Social Sciences and PhilosophyUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland
  2. 2.Department of EducationUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations