Slovenia on the Path to Proactive Transparency

  • Polonca KovačEmail author
Part of the Governance and Public Management book series (GPM)


Access to information is guaranteed in Slovenia by the Freedom of Information Act adopted in 2003, which determines a broad scope of public information, the entities that are bound by law to disclose public information, including publicly owned companies, and ensures the right to information to any interested applicant. Furthermore, the reuse of information and proactive measures are regulated and implemented by the coordinating body, that is, the Ministry of Public Administration. The proceedings are conducted in compliance with the Administrative Procedure Act. The article addresses the respective provisions implemented in the practice of public bodies, the appeal procedures of the Information Commissioner, and the case law in Slovenia. Finally, an overall assessment is given based on normative analysis, a comparative review, statistical data, case studies, and in-depth interviews. The results reveal a rather high level of transparency; however, there is still an implementation gap.


  1. Aristovnik, A., et al. (2016). Slovenska javna uprava na razpotju strateških sprememb [Slovene public administration at the Cross-roads of strategic changes]. Ljubljana: Faculty of Administration.Google Scholar
  2. Banisar, D. (2006). Freedom of information around the world 2006—A global survey of access to government information laws. Freedom Info.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, J. (2008). Transforming administrative procedure. Seville: Global Law Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brandsma, G. J., et al. (2010, June 24–26). Studying open government in the EU: From normative debates to empirical fact-finding. In: ECPR/SGEU Conference, Oporto.Google Scholar
  5. Bugarič, B. (2012). Openness and transparency in public administration: Challenges for public law. Wisconsin International Law Journal, 3, 483–521.Google Scholar
  6. Čebulj, J., & Žurej, J. (2005). Varstvo osebnih podatkov in informacije javnega značaja [Personal data protection and public information]. Ljubljana: Nebra.Google Scholar
  7. Doria, V. (2017, February 1). Interview with the Secretary General of the TIS.Google Scholar
  8. Galetta, D.-U., et al. (2015). The general principles of EU administrative procedural law. Brussels: European Parliament.Google Scholar
  9. GRIR, The Global Right to Information Rating. (2017).
  10. Hofmann, H. C. H., et al. (2014). The model rules. ReNEUAL.Google Scholar
  11. Knez, R. (2016). Free access to environmental information (Working paper, no. 21). Maribor: The University of Maribor Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence.Google Scholar
  12. Kotnik Šumah, K. (2010). Kaj nas čaka na področju transparentnosti [What is waiting in the field of transparency]. Pravna praksa, 5, 13–14.Google Scholar
  13. Kovač, P. (2014). Significance of and comparative trends in procedural regulation of right to information. International Public Administration Review, 2(3), 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kovač, P. (2015). Contemporary challenges of access to information in public governance in South Eastern Europe. Lex Localis, 2, 185–204. Scholar
  15. Kovač, P., Virant, G., et al. (2011). Razvoj slovenske javne uprave 1991–2011 [The development of the Slovene PA 1991–2011]. Ljubljana: Official Gazette of RS.Google Scholar
  16. Kovač, P., et al. (2012). Upravno-procesne dileme pri rabi ZUP 2 [Administrative-procedural Dilemmas in the use of the GAPA 2]. Ljubljana: Official Gazette of RS.Google Scholar
  17. Kovač, P., Bileišis, M., et al. (2017). Public administration reforms in the Eastern European Union member states: Post-accession convergences and divergences. Vilnius/Ljubljana: Mykolas Romeris University/Faculty of Administration.Google Scholar
  18. Mendel, T. (2008). UNESCO freedom of information: A comparative legal survey. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  19. OECD. (2014). The principles of public administration. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  20. OGP, Open Government Partnership. (2017).
  21. Pirc Musar, N. (2015). How to strike the right balance between access to public information and personal data protection. Vienna: Faculty of Law.Google Scholar
  22. Pličanič, S., et al. (2005). Komentar ZDIJZ [The commentary of the FOIA]. Ljubljana: Institute for Public Administration.Google Scholar
  23. Prelesnik, M., & Kotnik Šumah, K. (2017, February 17). Interview with the IC and the IC Deputy.Google Scholar
  24. Prepeluh, U. (2005). Pravica dostopa do informacij javnega značaja [The right to access to information of a public nature]. Ljubljana: Faculty of Law.Google Scholar
  25. Prešern, M., & Lainšček, R. (2017, February 3). Interview with the representatives of the MPA and the Public Sector Inspectorate. Google Scholar
  26. Rose-Ackerman, S., Lindseth, P. L., et al. (2010). Comparative administrative law. Cheltenham: Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Salha, A. (2014). Freedom of information act: A comparative analysis. Milano: Diritto di Sapere.Google Scholar
  28. Savino, M. (2010). The right to open public administration in Europe: Emerging legal standards (SIGMA papers, no. 46). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  29. Statskontoret. (2005). Principles of good administration in the MS of the EU. Stockholm: Statskontoret.Google Scholar
  30. Šturm, L., et al. (2011). Komentar Ustave Republike Slovenije [Commentary on the constitution of the RS]. Brdo: Faculty of Government and EU Studies.Google Scholar
  31. Teršek, A. (2007). Svoboda izražanja v sodni praksi Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice in slovenski ustavnosodni praksi [Freedom of expression in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights and Slovene constitutional case law]. Ljubljana: Information and Documentation Centre of the Council of Europe at the National University Library.Google Scholar
  32. TIS, Transparency International Slovenija. (2015). Ali so inšpekcijski postopki res transparentni in učinkoviti? [Are inspection procedures really transparent and efficient?]. Ljubljana: TIS.Google Scholar
  33. Vintar, M., et al. (2013). The past, present and the future of public administration in Central and Eastern Europe. Bratislava: NISPAcee.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of AdministrationUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations